Combining brain stimulation and cognitive training to improve decision-making and impulse control
Official title: The Use of Combined Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) and Cognitive Training to Modulate Decision-making in Healthy People
Run by Queen's University · NCT03886025 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing if combining brain stimulation with cognitive training can help young adults make better decisions and control their impulses.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 40 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 60 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Queen's University Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Kingston, Ontario) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | September 15, 2022 |
| Main results expected | December 30, 2026 |
| Study ends | December 30, 2026 |
| Registry record updated | August 8, 2025 |
| Trial ID | NCT03886025 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates for this study are healthy volunteers aged between 18 and 40.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with epilepsy, neurological conditions, significant head injuries, or a history of substance misuse or major mental disorders may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This study investigates the effects of combined anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and cognitive training on decision-making and impulse control in healthy volunteers aged 18 to 40. Participants will undergo either active or sham tDCS while performing the Iowa Gambling Task, which assesses decision-making under uncertainty. The study aims to determine if the combined intervention leads to more advantageous decisions and better impulse control compared to the sham treatment. Additionally, the research will explore whether these effects can be generalized to other cognitive tasks related to motor impulsivity.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this approach could enhance decision-making and impulse control, potentially benefiting individuals with impulsivity-related issues.
How similar studies have gone: While there is limited research on the combined effects of tDCS and cognitive training, similar studies have shown promise in enhancing cognitive functions.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Consenting volunteers aged between 18 and 40. Exclusion Criteria: * Individuals with epilepsy, other neurological conditions and history of significant head injury will be excluded. * Individuals with a history of substance misuse, major mental disorder and those receiving psychotropic medication will be also excluded.
Where it's running
-
Queen's University
Kingston, Ontario, Canada Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Najat Khalifa, MD — Queen's University - Canada
- Study coordinator: Najat Khalifa, MD, FRCPC
- Email: nrk2@queensu.ca
- Phone: 6135444900
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
How vaccine-related inflammation may affect how doctors make treatment decisions
This study tests whether a mild inflammatory state from a flu shot changes decision-making in emergency and internal medicine clinicians.
-
Testing Alcohol Health Warning Labels for US Adults
A randomized online study will test different warning statements about alcohol and breast cancer risk among adult US women who drink or are young non-drinkers to see which warnings are most convincing.
-
Benchmarking AI language models against tumor boards for oncology treatment decisions
This project tests whether frontier AI language models can match the treatment recommendations of multidisciplinary tumor boards for common cancers using standardized synthetic cases.
-
Heart rate variability feedback to help practitioners make better patient decisions
This study tests whether giving healthcare workers HRV feedback during care improves how quickly and safely they respond to ventilator events and bedside needs.
-
Testing warning labels on cannabis packaging to see what design helps people notice risks
Researchers are testing different cannabis warning labels to see which designs make people notice health risks and think about their use more carefully.
-
Intensive neurofeedback for children with ADHD: personalized vs. standard theta-beta training
This study tests two neurofeedback approaches in children with ADHD to see if a personalized, iAPF-based theta-beta training works better than a standard theta-beta training.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.