Clinical trial Recruiting at 1 site Interventional Ages 18 and up Women only

Closing the uterus during cesarean: include or exclude the decidual layer to see if the scar heals better

Official title: The Impact of Decidual Inclusion or Sparing in a Single Unlocked Closure of a Cesarean Uterine Incision: Randomized Controlled Trial

Run by Kantonsspital Baden · NCT07608874 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This randomized trial tests whether including or sparing the decidual layer when closing the uterus at cesarean delivery leads to better scar healing 6 to 9 months later for first-time mothers.

Quick facts

Study typeInterventional
Ages18 Years and up
SexWomen only
Enrollment374 (estimated)
SponsorKantonsspital Baden
Academic / other
Locations1 site (Baden, Canton of Aargau)
StatusRecruiting
StartedJune 17, 2026
Main results expectedMay 1, 2029
Study endsMay 30, 2029
Registry record updatedAugust 25, 2026
Trial IDNCT07608874 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Women with singleton, term pregnancies planning an elective cesarean delivery who understand the study and consent to randomization.

Probably not a fit

Patients who have emergent cesareans, placenta previa or suspected placenta accreta, diabetes, prior cesareans, or other exclusion criteria may not benefit from this approach.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

This prospective, randomized study compares two single-layer, non-locked uterine closure techniques during elective cesarean sections. One group includes the cavum-near decidual layer in the suture, while the other spares it. All steps are standardized except for how the decidual layer near the uterine margin is handled. Scar healing and the presence of niche or isthmocele defects are assessed by blinded ultrasound 6 to 9 months post-surgery. The goal is to determine if decidual inclusion or sparing influences cesarean scar healing and defect formation.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If decisive, the findings could inform safer closure techniques to reduce scar defects and potential gynecologic symptoms in future pregnancies.

How similar studies have gone: Previous work has explored uterine closure methods with mixed results; this trial directly tests the impact of decidual inclusion vs sparing on scar healing.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

* Singleton, term pregnancy
* Elective cesarean section before labor onset or membrane rupture
* Maternal age \>18 years
* Ability to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

* Placenta previa
* Maternal substance abuse or infection
* Suspected placenta accreta
* Diabetes
* one or more prior cesarean section
* Vulnerable participants (e.g., mental health conditions)
* Emergency cesarean sections

Where it's running

  • Kantonsspital Baden
    Baden, Canton of Aargau, Switzerland
    Recruiting

Study contacts

  • Principal investigator: Amr S. Hamza, Assoc. Prof. — Kantonsspital Baden
  • Study coordinator: Amr S. Hamza, Assoc. Prof.
  • Email: amr.hamza@ksb.ch
  • Phone: +41564863513

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.