Clinical trial Recruiting at 1 site Interventional Ages 18 and up

Stent versus no stent after ureteroscopy for ureteral stones

Official title: Prospective Randomized Study on the Necessity of Postoperative Stenting After Ureteroscopy (URS) for Ureteral Stones.

Run by Kantonsspital Baden · NCT07283003 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This study will see if leaving a double-J stent in after ureteroscopy reduces postoperative pain and complications compared with not placing a stent in adults treated for ureteral stones.

Quick facts

Study typeInterventional
Ages18 Years and up
SexAll
Enrollment60 (estimated)
SponsorKantonsspital Baden
Academic / other
Locations1 site (Baden)
StatusRecruiting
StartedJanuary 8, 2026
Main results expectedSeptember 2027
Study endsSeptember 2027
Registry record updatedFebruary 17, 2026
Trial IDNCT07283003 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Adults (18+) scheduled for ureteroscopy and stone removal who have provided informed consent and meet pre-stenting criteria are ideal candidates.

Probably not a fit

Patients with complex ureteral conditions, impacted stones, a solitary kidney, significant renal stones (>3 mm), prior ureteral surgeries (other than endoscopic stone treatments), or pregnancy are unlikely to benefit from omission of a stent.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

Adults undergoing ureteroscopy for ureteral stone removal will be assigned to either receive a double-J ureteral stent after the procedure or to have no stent placed. Postoperative pain, stent-related urinary symptoms, and complication rates such as colic or infection will be tracked, with pain recorded using standardized measures and a pain-tracking app. The trial compares the necessity of routine stenting against potential harms from stent discomfort to determine whether routine placement can be safely omitted in selected patients. Results will inform whether avoiding routine stents improves patient comfort without increasing risk.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, the study could reduce unnecessary stent placements and related discomfort while keeping complication rates low, improving postoperative quality of life.

How similar studies have gone: Previous studies have shown mixed results; avoiding routine stenting has been safe in selected uncomplicated cases but overall evidence remains limited.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

* Age 18 years or older
* Patients with ureteral stones scheduled for ureteroscopy (URS) and stone removal
* Previous pre-stenting
* Informed Consent as documented

Exclusion Criteria:

* Complex ureteral conditions (e.g., known ureteral strictures)
* Impacted stones
* Solitary kidney
* Patients with significant renal stones (\>3mm)
* Previous ureteral surgeries (except endoscopic stone treatments)
* Pregnancy or suspected pregnancy

Where it's running

  • Kantonsspital Baden AG
    Baden, Switzerland
    Recruiting

Study contacts

  • Principal investigator: Lukas John Hefermehl, PD Dr. med. — Kantonsspital Baden AG

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Browse more
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.