Cleaning tools for full-arch implant-supported fixed prostheses
Official title: Comparison of Cleaning Efficacy of Different Cleaning Aids for Full-arch Implant Supported Fixed Protheses: A Self-controlled Crossover Clinical Trial
Run by Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University · NCT07474493 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This test compares Superfloss, interdental brushes, and a water flosser to see which cleans best for people with full-arch implant-supported fixed prostheses.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 18 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | January 14, 2026 |
| Main results expected | January 31, 2027 |
| Study ends | January 31, 2027 |
| Registry record updated | March 16, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07474493 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults (≥18) with single-arch or full-arch edentulism who have completed implant placement and immediate restoration, are scheduled for the definitive prosthesis, can perform self-care, and can provide informed consent.
✕Probably not a fit
People who smoke ≥10 cigarettes per day, cannot perform prosthesis cleaning independently, have uncontrolled periodontal disease in remaining teeth, or have failed implants requiring reimplantation are unlikely to be eligible or to benefit.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This randomized controlled trial assigns adults with single-arch or full-arch implant-supported fixed prostheses to use Superfloss, interdental brushes, or a water flosser. Participants receive standardized instructions and are followed over a relatively long observation period to measure plaque accumulation, peri-implant biological signs, and hygiene outcomes. Clinical examinations and objective plaque measurements will be used to compare the real-world cleaning effectiveness of each tool. The aim is to identify the most effective routine cleaning approach to reduce plaque-related complications and support long-term prosthesis success.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the results could identify the best cleaning tool to reduce plaque and lower the risk of peri-implant biological complications, helping implants last longer.
How similar studies have gone: Similar tools are commonly used and have shown benefit in small or laboratory studies, but in vivo randomized comparisons with long follow-up are limited.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Age ≥18 years; 2. Patients with single-arch or full-arch edentulism / terminal dentition who have completed implant placement and immediate restoration and are scheduled to receive the definitive prosthesis; 3. Patients with good compliance who provide informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Smoking (≥10 cigarettes per day); 2. Lack of self-care ability and unable to perform prosthesis cleaning independently; 3. Uncontrolled periodontitis in remaining teeth or unstable periodontal condition; 4. Presence of failed implants in the full-arch implant restoration and requiring second implantation.
Where it's running
-
Department of Oral and Maxillo-facial Implantology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China Recruiting
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Dental Abutments With Different Surfaces in Two-Unit Implant Bridges
This study tests whether two different abutment surface types affect outcomes for people needing two-implant-supported, two-unit bridges in the back of the mouth.
-
Accuracy of the Calibrated Framework for Full-Arch Implant Impressions in Edentulous Patients
This study tests whether digital scanning with a calibrated framework can match the accuracy of traditional splinted impressions for full-arch dental implants in completely toothless patients.
-
Comparison of Non-Calibrated Splinting Scan Bodies and a T-Marker for Full-Arch Implant Scanning
Researchers are testing two digital methods to record implant positions for full-arch implant-supported prostheses in fully edentulous patients to see which is faster and more accurate.
-
Digital jaw tracking for full-arch maxillary implant restorations
This randomized trial tests whether using digital jaw tracking to guide the fabrication of full-arch maxillary implant-supported prostheses improves occlusal accuracy and patient satisfaction compared with a conventional workflow.
-
Biodontoss and DWC dental implants and superstructures in adults needing tooth replacement
This PMCF study tests whether BIODENTOSS and DWC dental implants and their superstructures are safe and effective for adults with tooth loss over 24 months.
-
Palatal rugae designs for upper dentures and patient comfort
We will test three palatal surface designs in upper complete dentures to see if they improve comfort, chewing, speaking, and overall oral quality of life for adults without teeth aged 40 to 80.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.