Carbon footprint of diagnostic versus therapeutic upper GI endoscopy
Official title: THE DIFFERENCE IN CARBON FOOTPRINT BETWEEN DIAGNOSTIC UPPER GI ENDOSCOPY IN DYSPEPTIC PATIENTS VERSUS THERAPEUTIC UPPER GI BLEEDING
Run by King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital · NCT07261228 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This project will measure how much carbon is produced by diagnostic endoscopy for dyspepsia compared with therapeutic endoscopy for non-variceal upper GI bleeding.
Quick facts
| Study type | Observational |
|---|---|
| Ages | 20 Years to 80 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 75 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital Academic / other |
| Locations | 2 sites (Bangkok and 1 other locations) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | June 1, 2025 |
| Main results expected | August 31, 2025 |
| Study ends | December 31, 2025 |
| Registry record updated | December 3, 2025 |
| Trial ID | NCT07261228 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are adults 20–80 years old with dyspepsia or non-variceal upper GI bleeding, BMI ≤30, and who will receive the specified diagnostic or therapeutic endoscopic procedures.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients who are pregnant, have severe coagulopathy, receive inhalation anesthesia, or require different endoscopic interventions are unlikely to benefit from this specific comparison.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This is an observational study measuring the direct carbon footprint generated during upper GI endoscopy performed for dyspepsia (diagnostic) and for non-variceal upper GI bleeding (therapeutic) at two hospitals in Thailand. Investigators will record procedure duration, energy use, and disposable equipment consumption to calculate life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions attributable to the procedures themselves. Patients aged 20–80 with BMI ≤30 who undergo specified diagnostic or therapeutic endoscopic interventions are enrolled and excluded if they have major coagulopathy, pregnancy, or receive inhalation anesthesia. The study tests the hypothesis that therapeutic endoscopy produces higher carbon emissions due to longer procedures and increased use of disposables and energy.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the results could help hospitals reduce the environmental impact of endoscopy by identifying higher-emission practices and guiding greener protocols.
How similar studies have gone: Prior work has estimated overall endoscopy carbon footprints including indirect sources like patient travel, but no prior studies have directly compared the direct emissions of diagnostic versus therapeutic upper GI endoscopy, so this comparison is relatively novel.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients with dyspepsia or non-variceal upper GI bleeding * Age 20-80 years * Body mass index of 30 or less; * Receiving one of the following procedure during upper GI endoscopy: For diagnostic endoscopy: Rapid urease test for H. pylori infection For therapeutic endoscopy: stop bleeding with either Argon plasma coagulation or Bipolar hemostasis probe or Hemostasis clip Exclusion Criteria: * Platelet \< 50,000 * INR \> 2.5 * Pregnancy * History of allergy to IV sedative medication * Peptic ulcer grade IIc and III according to Forrest classification * Patient receiving inhalation anesthesia
Where it's running
-
King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital
Bangkok, Thailand Recruiting -
Sawanpracharak Hospital
Nakhon Sawan, Thailand Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Ponthakorn Pichayanont, Doctor of Medicine
- Email: ponthakorn.pi@gmail.com
- Phone: 66831237704
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Virtual poetry workshops to boost well-being for people with digestive symptoms
This study tests whether participating in online poetry workshops can improve emotional well-being for adults with chronic digestive symptoms and anxiety or depression.
-
Symptoms and quality of life in people with gastric inlet patches
This study will see if adults having a medically indicated gastroscopy who have heterotopic gastric mucosa (gastric inlet patches) are more likely to have swallowing problems, indigestion, or lower quality of life than those without it.
-
Adding Saccharomyces boulardii to bismuth quadruple therapy for H. pylori rescue
This tests whether adding the probiotic Saccharomyces boulardii to bismuth-containing quadruple therapy helps adults whose H. pylori infection did not clear after prior treatments.
-
High-resolution stomach mapping with gastroduodenal pressure testing
This study tests whether high-resolution body-surface gastric mapping and gastroduodenal manometry, with or without transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulation (tVNS), can identify stomach dysfunction patterns that match symptoms in people with functional dyspepsia.
-
Chios mastic water for dyspepsia
This 3-month randomized, double-blind test will see if adults aged 30–60 with dyspepsia feel better when they drink 600 mL per day of a carbonated beverage containing Chios mastic water versus a placebo beverage.
-
Evaluating the effectiveness of Danning Tablets for digestive symptoms
This study is testing if Danning Tablets can help people aged 18 to 75 feel better from digestive issues like indigestion and bloating while they are already using the medication.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.