Aspirin alone versus aspirin plus fondaparinux before early coronary angiography for NSTEMI
Official title: Aspirin Versus Aspirin and Fondaparinux Prior to Early Invasive Strategy in Patients With NSTEMI
Run by University of Aarhus · NCT06710184 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This trial will test whether giving aspirin alone or aspirin plus the anticoagulant fondaparinux before early coronary angiography is better and safer for adults with NSTEMI.
Quick facts
| Phase | Phase 4 |
|---|---|
| Study type | Interventional |
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 5076 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | University of Aarhus Academic / other |
| Locations | 10 sites (Herning, Region Midt and 9 other locations) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | May 1, 2025 |
| Main results expected | January 1, 2029 |
| Study ends | July 1, 2029 |
| Registry record updated | May 4, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT06710184 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults with a confirmed NSTEMI who can undergo coronary angiography within 72 hours, are not on anticoagulants, and do not have severe renal or liver disease, active bleeding, or other contraindications to fondaparinux.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients already on anticoagulants, those with STEMI or who need immediate invasive care, those with very low eGFR, active bleeding, or pregnancy are unlikely to benefit from enrollment.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
Patients with confirmed NSTEMI who are planned for early coronary angiography (usually within 72 hours) are randomized to receive either aspirin alone or aspirin plus fondaparinux before the procedure. Treatments are given prior to coronary angiography, and patients may undergo PCI (balloon/stent) if indicated. The trial excludes patients already on anticoagulants, those with very low kidney function, active bleeding, or other high bleeding risk, and those needing immediate emergency angiography. Outcomes focus on balancing ischemic protection with bleeding risk in the context of modern early invasive care.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the study could show that aspirin alone provides similar protection with less bleeding and simpler care compared with adding fondaparinux.
How similar studies have gone: Older randomized trials showed benefit for fondaparinux in some NSTEMI populations, but those trials largely predate routine early invasive management, so the question remains in current practice.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
* Diagnosis of NSTEMI verified by:
* Rise or/and fall in cardiac troponin (cTN) and
* Symptoms of acute ischemia or ECG-changes compatible with acute ischemia.
* Age above 18 years old
* Expected remaining lifespan above 1 year
* Informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
* Treatment with any anticoagulants before enrollment and randomization
* Including any direct anticoagulant (DOAC), LMWH, UFH or warfarin.
* Not possible with CAG and PCI within 72 hours
* Unsuitable for CAG and possible PCI due to poor condition
* Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \< 20 ml/min/1.73m2
* Known liver disease
* Active bleeding or high risk of bleeding where treatment with Fondaparinux is contraindicated.
* Anemia (B-Hemoglobin \< 6.0 mmol/l)
* Pregnancy or breastfeeding
* Endocarditis
* Indication for acute CAG before enrollment and randomization:
* ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI)
* Patients classified as "Very High Risk" according to ESC guidelines, defined as(1):
* Hemodynamic instability (in need of inotropic support) or cardiogenic shock (DANGER-SHOCK criteria (20)) at time of admission.
* Acute heart failure because of presumed acute ischemia
* Life-threatening arrhythmias or cardiac arrest
* Mechanical complications (such as papillary muscle rupture with acute mitral regurgitation, free wall rupture and interventricular rupture)
Where it's running
-
Regionshospitalet Gødstrup
Herning, Region Midt, Denmark Recruiting -
Regionshospitalet Viborg
Viborg, Region Midt, Denmark Recruiting -
Sygehus Søndejylland, Aabenraa
Aabenraa, Region Syd, Denmark Recruiting -
Sygehus Lillebælt, Kolding
Kolding, Region Syd, Denmark Recruiting -
Odense Universitetshospital
Odense, Region Syd, Denmark Recruiting -
Sygehus Lillebælt, Vejle
Vejle, Region Syd, Denmark Recruiting
Show 4 more locations
-
Aarhus University Hospital, Department of Cardiology
Aarhus N, Denmark Recruiting -
Regionshospitalet Horsens
Horsens, Region Midt, Denmark Not yet recruiting -
Aalborg Universitetshospital
Aalborg, Region Nord, Denmark Not yet recruiting -
Esbjerg Sygehus
Esbjerg, Region Syd, Denmark Not yet recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Christian B Fur, MD
- Email: chbyni@rm.dk
- Phone: +4524918071
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Can 1-Hz rTMS help with heart rhythm and inflammation after a heart attack?
This trial tests whether daily 1-Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation can improve heart rate variability and reduce inflammation in people who have had an acute myocardial infarction, compared with a sham procedure.
-
Trends and risk factors for adverse events after primary PCI in AMI patients over 20 years
This study looks at real-world AMI patients who had a primary PCI to see how often serious events happen during a 2-year follow-up and what factors predict them.
-
SPIKE FLOW endocardial pacing lead safety and performance study
This study tests whether the SPIKE FLOW temporary endocardial pacing lead is safe and effective in adults needing temporary pacing during heart-related conditions.
-
Predict Arrhythmia Risk with Intelligent Software
Researchers are testing AI-powered predictions to see if clinicians can spot patients at risk for dangerous heart rhythms using bedside ECG data.
-
Left Ventricular Support and Advanced Monitoring in AMI–Cardiogenic Shock: Immediate Impella Use and PAC/Monitoring vs Standard Care
In adults with heart attack-related cardiogenic shock, this trial tests whether using an Impella left ventricular assist device and/or protocolized pulmonary artery catheter monitoring improves survival compared with standard care.
-
BRIDGE: Embedding consumer mHealth tools into cardiac rehab
This study tests whether adding a mobile health tool to standard center-based cardiac rehab helps heart patients stay active and follow healthy habits.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.