Clinical trial Recruiting at 1 site Interventional Ages 18 to 40 Women only

Argon plasma coagulation versus standard cystectomy for ovarian endometrioma

Official title: Argon Plasma Treatment for Ovarian Endometrioma Compared to Standard Cystectomy: A Prospective Controlled Randomized Pilot Study

Run by Erbe Elektromedizin GmbH · NCT07065214 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This trial will test whether argon plasma coagulation preserves ovarian reserve better than standard cystectomy for people having surgery for ovarian endometriomas.

Quick facts

Study typeInterventional
Ages18 Years to 40 Years
SexWomen only
Enrollment72 (estimated)
SponsorErbe Elektromedizin GmbH
Industry-sponsored
Locations1 site (Tübingen, Germany)
StatusRecruiting
StartedNovember 26, 2025
Main results expectedNovember 1, 2028
Study endsMay 30, 2029
Registry record updatedOctober 7, 2026
Trial IDNCT07065214 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

People with symptomatic ovarian endometriomas who are scheduled for surgical treatment, can give informed consent, and meet the study's eligibility criteria are ideal candidates.

Probably not a fit

Patients who have had prior ovarian surgery, recurrent ovarian endometrioma, are pregnant or breastfeeding, cannot comply with follow-up, or are enrolled in other studies affecting AMH are not eligible and likely would not benefit from this trial.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

This is a prospective, single-center, randomized controlled pilot trial enrolling 72 patients with symptomatic ovarian endometriomas who are scheduled for surgery. Participants are randomized 1:1 to receive either standard cystectomy or argon plasma coagulation (APC) during laparoscopy. The main outcome compares changes in serum AMH from before surgery to follow-up at 6 months, with a pre-specified primary endpoint analysis after the last patient completes Visit 4. The trial is conducted at the Department for Women's Health in Tübingen, Germany, under a post-market evaluation framework.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, APC could better preserve ovarian reserve and reduce the impact of surgery on future fertility compared with standard cystectomy.

How similar studies have gone: Standard cystectomy is a well-established treatment known to affect ovarian reserve, while APC for ovarian endometrioma is less studied and has only limited preliminary evidence.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

* Indication for surgical endometrioma treatment according to patient symptoms
* Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

* Expected lack of patient compliance or inability of the patient to understand the purpose of the clinical trial
* Prior procedures at the ovaries
* Recurrent endometrioma (patients with recurrent endometriosis outside of the ovar, e.g. peritoneal endometriosis lesions can be included)
* Pregnant or breastfeeding patients
* Participation in any other clinical study that could affect the AMH level or pregnancy

Where it's running

  • Department for Women's Health
    Tübingen, Germany, Germany
    Recruiting

Study contacts

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Browse more
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.