Clinical trial Recruiting at 1 site Interventional Ages 18 to 45

Alternate nostril breathing versus Buteyko breathing for improving asthma symptoms

Official title: Comparative Effects of Alternative Nostril Breathing Versus Buteyko Breathing on Control Pause, Dyspnea and Pulmonary Function in Patients With Bronchial Asthma

Run by Foundation University Islamabad · NCT07529847 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This study will test whether alternate nostril breathing or the Buteyko breathing technique helps adults with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma breathe easier and improve lung function over four weeks.

More Asthma (Diagnosis) trials

Quick facts

Study typeInterventional
Ages18 Years to 45 Years
SexAll
Enrollment46 (estimated)
SponsorFoundation University Islamabad
Academic / other
Locations1 site (Islamabad)
StatusRecruiting
StartedFebruary 28, 2026
Main results expectedMay 15, 2026
Study endsMay 15, 2026
Registry record updatedApril 14, 2026
Trial IDNCT07529847 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Adults aged 18–45 with mild-to-moderate persistent bronchial asthma and mMRC dyspnea grade 1–3 who can follow instructions are the intended participants.

Probably not a fit

Patients with severe or acute asthma exacerbations, acute infections, inability to follow commands, or an already high control pause (>40 seconds) are unlikely to benefit from these techniques within this study's design.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

Researchers will randomize 40 adults (age 18–45) with mild-to-moderate persistent bronchial asthma to receive either Alternate Nostril Breathing or the Buteyko Breathing Technique in addition to their usual medications. Interventions last four weeks with two supervised sessions per week plus guided home practice, and outcomes include control pause, dyspnea scores, spirometry measures, and asthma control. The trial excludes patients with acute exacerbations, acute infections, inability to follow instructions, or a control pause greater than 40 seconds. Group differences in symptom scores and pulmonary function will be compared to see which breathing technique produces greater short-term improvements.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, the preferred breathing technique could offer a low-cost, medication-supportive way to reduce breathlessness and improve lung function in people with mild-to-moderate asthma.

How similar studies have gone: Small prior trials and breathing-retraining programs such as Buteyko have reported mixed but sometimes positive effects on symptoms and hyperventilation in asthma, while alternate nostril breathing has less direct clinical trial evidence.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

* Age between 18-45 years
* Both genders (male and female)
* Grade 1-3 on mMRC scale of dyspnea
* Asthma severity classes- intermediate,mild persistent and moderate persistent asthma (acc. to NAEPP National Asthma Education and Prevention Program guidlines 2020)

Exclusion Criteria:

* Patients having acute exerbation of COPD/status asthmaticus
* Patients diagnosed with acute infection
* Patients unable to follow command and instructions
* Asthma patients with \>40sec control pause duration

Where it's running

  • Foundation University Islamabad
    Islamabad, Pakistan
    Recruiting

Study contacts

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.