Algorithm-guided eye refraction for children aged 6–12
Official title: Algorithm-assisted Subjective Refraction Program Dedicated to Children
Run by Essilor International · NCT07046065 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This project tests whether an algorithm-guided subjective refraction program (two versions) can give accurate non-cycloplegic eyeglass prescriptions for children 6–12 compared with the usual manual subjective refraction.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 6 Years to 12 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 166 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Essilor International Industry-sponsored |
| Locations | 1 site (Vila Nova de Famalicão) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | May 23, 2025 |
| Main results expected | December 31, 2025 |
| Study ends | December 31, 2025 |
| Registry record updated | July 1, 2025 |
| Trial ID | NCT07046065 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Children aged 6–12 who can recognize Latin letters, have pupillary distance ≥49 mm, spherical equivalent between −6.00 and +6.00 D with cylinder ≤3.00 D, and monocular distance visual acuity of at least 0.5 decimal in each eye are ideal candidates.
✕Probably not a fit
Children with amblyopia, strabismus, prior ocular surgery, ocular or systemic conditions that affect refraction, pupillary distance under 49 mm, or refractive errors outside the study limits are unlikely to benefit from the software in this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
The investigation compares two versions of Essilor's Kids Refraction software (vA, which runs the refraction sequence, and vB, which adds steps to manage a child's attention) used with Vision-R™700 or Vision-S™700 phoropters against a conventional manual subjective refraction with the Vision-R™700. The study is non-cycloplegic and measures agreement in sphere, cylinder, axis, and visual acuity between the algorithm-assisted and conventional methods. Phase A validates vA and Phase B validates vB, with randomization to Vision-R or Vision-S devices for the software arms. Participants are children aged 6–12 who can name Latin letters and meet refractive and acuity limits.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the software could provide faster, more consistent pediatric refractions and reduce variability between examiners.
How similar studies have gone: Automated and algorithm-based refraction systems have shown reasonable agreement with manual refraction in adults, but dedicated algorithm-assisted subjective refraction specifically designed for children is less well established.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Age between 6 and 12 years 2. Subject able to recognize and name the letters of the Latin alphabet 3. Pupillary distance (PD) not less than 49mm 4. Distance refractive error for spherical equivalence (SE) within the range of \[-6.00 to +6.00 D\] maximum of the two absolute values RE and LE; Cyl ≤ 3.00 D 5. Monocular Visual acuity ≥ +0.30 LogMAR (0.5 Decimal VA) in each eye at distance 6. Visual acuity difference \< 0.20 logMAR between right and left eyes at distance Exclusion Criteria: 1. Vulnerability of the subject 2. Amblyopia 3. Strabismus 4. Any current or evolving pathology manifested in the eye or the appendages which might have an influence on vision, or interfere with refractive state 5. Any previous ocular surgery, which might have an influence on vision or interfere with study assessments (e.g. iridectomy, refractive surgery…) 6. Any ocular or systemic condition known to affect refractive status (e.g., keratoconus, diabetes, Down's syndrome, etc.) 7. Any neurological or speech disorders that might interfere with the ability to understand and answer questions or communicate with the ECP 8. Any untreated and/or uncontrolled systemic condition which might have an influence on vision or interfere with study assessments 9. Current use of ocular or systemic medications, which, in the Investigator's opinion, may significantly affect pupil size, accommodation or refractive state 10. History of myopia control intervention that may affect refractive assessment (e.g., atropine, orthokeratology, rigid gas permeable lenses (RGP) etc.) except myopia control spectacles 11. Contraindications of cycloplegia (e.g. high Intra-ocular pressure - more than 22mmHg in either eye, narrow anterior angle, history of allergy to cycloplegic agents or seizures, etc) 12. Aphakic or pseudoaphakic (intraocular lens), 13. Prismatic prescription in either Right or Left eye (horizontal or vertical). -
Where it's running
-
Centro de Investigação, Inovação e Ensino Superior (CIIES) de Famalicão
Vila Nova de Famalicão, Portugal Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: José Manuel González- Meijome, PhD — Clinical & Experimental Optometry Research Lab Department of Physics (Optometry) - School of Science University of Minho, 4710-057 Gualtar - Braga (Portugal)
- Study coordinator: Ana Júlia Sousa
- Email: asousa@evidenze.com
- Phone: +351 21 409 60 79
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Two monthly silicone hydrogel multifocal toric contact lenses in wearers with astigmatism and myopia
This study tests whether two popular soft multifocal toric contact lenses perform differently in adults who need vision correction for astigmatism and myopia.
-
Seeing clearly in low light after Ray-Tracing guided LASIK
A trial tests how well WaveLight Plus LASIK works for people with myopia and astigmatism and whether patients are satisfied after the procedure.
-
Orthokeratology contact lenses with a 5 mm optic zone diameter
This study tests Paragon CRT lenses with a 5 mm optic zone in kids and young adults to see how well they fit, how well they vision, and how comfortable they are at night.
-
Corneal Biomechanics and Surgical Astigmatism after Cataract Surgery in Pseudoexfoliation
This study tests how the cornea's biomechanical properties before cataract surgery relate to the amount of blinking surgically induced astigmatism, comparing people with pseudoexfoliation to those without.
-
SMILE in one eye vs Ray tracing-guided LASIK in the fellow eye
This study tests two laser vision correction methods—SMILE in one eye and ray-tracing guided LASIK in the other eye—to see which provides better vision and quality of life for adults with myopia and astigmatism.
-
Nomogram for Astigmatism Correction of KLEx
This study tests whether using a nomogram can improve outcomes after astigmatism correction in adults who meet certain eye health criteria.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.