3D-printed versus conventional hearing-aid ear tips for comfort and fit
Official title: Effectiveness Comparison of 3D-Printed and Conventional Ear Tip Comfort in Individuals With Hearing Loss
Run by University of Arizona · NCT07228845 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study will test whether 3D-printed hearing-aid ear tips are as comfortable, fit as well, and sound as good as standard ear tips for people with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss, and will compare how long each takes to make and how much each costs.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 89 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 32 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | University of Arizona Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Tucson, Arizona) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | March 15, 2026 |
| Main results expected | April 15, 2027 |
| Study ends | April 25, 2027 |
| Registry record updated | May 1, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07228845 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are English-speaking adults with bilateral, symmetric sensorineural hearing loss and normal otoscopy who meet the clinic's inclusion criteria.
✕Probably not a fit
People with active outer or middle ear disease, a history of extensive ear surgery, neurological or cognitive disorders, or asymmetric hearing loss are unlikely to benefit from this comparison.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
Adults with bilateral, symmetric sensorineural hearing loss will be fitted with behind-the-ear (BTE) hearing aids using either 3D-printed or conventional ear tips and followed over a prolonged period. Participants will experience different ear-tip types so researchers can compare perceived sound quality, comfort, and fit using standard subjective and objective measures. The study will also record the manufacturing time and direct costs for each ear-tip method. Results will be used to compare user experience and resource implications between 3D-printed and standard ear tips.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, 3D-printed ear tips could provide a faster, lower-cost, and more personalized option that matches conventional ear tips for comfort and sound quality.
How similar studies have gone: Early pilot studies and commercial use of 3D-printed ear molds indicate comparable fit and cost advantages to conventional molds, but long-term comfort and sound-quality comparisons are still limited.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Bilateral, symmetric, sensorineural hearing loss, with thresholds between normal and severe degree of hearing loss * Normal otoscopy: patent ear canals with normal appearing eardrums and aerated middle ear, bilaterally. * English speaking. Exclusion Criteria: * Self reported history of extensive or current outer or middle ear pathology. * Self reported history of extensive outer or middle ear surgery. * Self reported history of neurological or cognitive disorder. * Active ear infection
Where it's running
-
The University of Arizona Hearing Clinic
Tucson, Arizona, United States Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Bryan Wong, AuD, PhD
- Email: bryanwong@arizona.edu
- Phone: 16025270359
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
3D-printed versus standard hearing-aid ear tips for comfort, fit, and sound
This study will test whether 3D-printed hearing-aid ear tips work as well as or better than standard ear tips for adults with normal hearing.
-
3D-Printed versus Conventional Palatal Cribs for Tongue Thrust in Children
This study tests whether a 3D-printed cobalt-chromium palatal crib works better than a traditional soldered stainless steel crib to help kids stop tongue thrusting.
-
3D printing orientation and layer thickness for maxillary complete dentures
This study tests how different 3D printing angles and layer thicknesses affect denture accuracy and patient satisfaction in people who need full upper dentures.
-
How hearing aids help in everyday noisy places
This project tests whether different hearing aid settings and everyday noisy situations change how well hearing aids help adults with symmetric, adult-onset sensorineural hearing loss who already use hearing aids.
-
AirPods Pro as hearing assistive technology
This test will see if AirPods Pro help adults with mild-to-moderate hearing loss understand speech in noisy places compared with hearing aids and wireless remote microphones.
-
Comparing 3D printed and conventionally made space maintainers for children's dental health
This study is testing if 3D printed space maintainers work better than traditional ones for children who need dental treatment after losing their baby teeth.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.