3D-printed mandibular overdentures made with three different impression techniques
Official title: Impact of Impression Techniques on Patient Satisfaction and Chewing Efficiency in 3D-Printed Implant Overdentures: A Crossover Study
Run by Mansoura University · NCT07208812 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This trial will test three ways of taking impressions to see which produces the best 3D-printed lower implant overdenture for people without teeth.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 45 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 16 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Mansoura University Academic / other |
| Drugs / interventions | chemotherapy |
| Locations | 1 site (Al Mansurah, Dakahlia Governorate) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | January 6, 2026 |
| Main results expected | April 30, 2027 |
| Study ends | May 31, 2027 |
| Registry record updated | January 29, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07208812 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults aged 45–70 who are completely edentulous in the mandible, healthy enough for two mandibular implants, and with adequate mandibular bone and firm mucosa are the ideal candidates.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with systemic diseases affecting bone healing, recent head or neck irradiation, uncontrolled metabolic bone disease, heavy smoking or alcoholism, parafunctional habits like bruxism, or insufficient mandibular bone are unlikely to benefit or qualify.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This randomized crossover trial at the Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University will enroll 16 completely edentulous adults aged 45–70 who will receive two implants in the mandibular canine region. Each participant will receive three 3D-printed mandibular overdentures fabricated from impressions taken by (1) a conventional open-tray implant-level technique, (2) a functionally generated reline technique, and (3) a mucostatic base with functional borders, wearing each prosthesis for three months with a two-week washout between phases. The primary outcome is masticatory efficiency measured by a color-mixing ability test at 3, 6, and 9 months, and patient satisfaction is a secondary outcome measured by a visual analog scale at the same intervals. Randomization determines the sequence of impressions in this crossover design to control for order effects.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this could identify the impression method that produces better chewing function and greater comfort for 3D-printed mandibular implant overdentures.
How similar studies have gone: Two-implant mandibular overdentures are a well-established standard and some studies support digital and 3D-printed prostheses, but direct comparisons of these specific impression techniques for 3D-printed overdentures are limited.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Healthy patients, free from systemic diseases that affect bone resorption (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes, osteoporosis) * Residual alveolar ridges covered with healthy, firm mucosa * Adequate mandibular bone length and width to accommodate standard implant sizes. * Angle's Class I maxillo-mandibular relationship. Exclusion Criteria: * Absolute contraindications to implant placement (e.g., active cancer, immune system diseases) * History of head and neck irradiation or chemotherapy within the past 3 years * Metabolic bone diseases such as uncontrolled diabetes, osteoporosis, or hyperparathyroidism * Parafunctional habits such as bruxism or clenching * Smoking or alcoholism * Any physical or medical condition that may interfere with study follow-up or implant success
Where it's running
-
Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University
Al Mansurah, Dakahlia Governorate, Egypt Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Shimaa E Aboelenin — Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University
- Study coordinator: Shimaa E Aboelenin
- Email: shimaaaboelenin@mans.edu.eg
- Phone: 01113786860
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Dental Abutments With Different Surfaces in Two-Unit Implant Bridges
This study tests whether two different abutment surface types affect outcomes for people needing two-implant-supported, two-unit bridges in the back of the mouth.
-
Accuracy of the Calibrated Framework for Full-Arch Implant Impressions in Edentulous Patients
This study tests whether digital scanning with a calibrated framework can match the accuracy of traditional splinted impressions for full-arch dental implants in completely toothless patients.
-
Comparison of Non-Calibrated Splinting Scan Bodies and a T-Marker for Full-Arch Implant Scanning
Researchers are testing two digital methods to record implant positions for full-arch implant-supported prostheses in fully edentulous patients to see which is faster and more accurate.
-
Digital jaw tracking for full-arch maxillary implant restorations
This randomized trial tests whether using digital jaw tracking to guide the fabrication of full-arch maxillary implant-supported prostheses improves occlusal accuracy and patient satisfaction compared with a conventional workflow.
-
Biodontoss and DWC dental implants and superstructures in adults needing tooth replacement
This PMCF study tests whether BIODENTOSS and DWC dental implants and their superstructures are safe and effective for adults with tooth loss over 24 months.
-
Palatal rugae designs for upper dentures and patient comfort
We will test three palatal surface designs in upper complete dentures to see if they improve comfort, chewing, speaking, and overall oral quality of life for adults without teeth aged 40 to 80.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.