When to do endoscopic drainage for infected necrotizing pancreatitis
Official title: Strategic Timing of Endoscopic Procedural Interventions in Infected Necrotizing Pancreatitis: The STEP-IN Trial
Run by Orlando Health, Inc. · NCT07406698 · Data updated 2026-11-12
We will test if earlier endoscopic drainage (within the first four weeks) helps adults with infected necrotizing pancreatitis recover faster and avoid complications.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 104 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Orlando Health, Inc. Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Orlando, Florida) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | January 28, 2026 |
| Main results expected | June 30, 2029 |
| Study ends | December 31, 2029 |
| Registry record updated | February 12, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07406698 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults (age ≥18) with symptomatic necrotic pancreatic collections on CT or MRI and documented or strongly suspected infected necrotizing pancreatitis are the ideal candidates.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with small collections likely to resolve without intervention, sterile necrosis, or those with contraindications to endoscopy may not benefit from early drainage.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This interventional study uses endoscopic ultrasound–guided transluminal drainage to manage symptomatic, infected necrotic pancreatic collections. Eligible adults have imaging-confirmed necrosis and documented or suspected infection and may receive earlier endoscopic intervention rather than waiting the traditional four-week walling-off period. Outcomes include infection control, organ failure, need for additional interventions or necrosectomy, complication rates, and length of hospital stay. The goal is to determine whether modern endoscopic approaches performed earlier can safely reduce morbidity and healthcare utilization compared with delayed management.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, earlier endoscopic drainage could prevent clinical deterioration, reduce complications and hospital stays, and lower the need for more invasive surgery.
How similar studies have gone: Single-center prospective data and recent meta-analyses suggest early endoscopic intervention can be performed safely, but high-quality randomized data remain limited.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Age ≥ 18 years 2. Patients with symptomatic necrotic collection diagnosed on MRI or CT abdomen/pelvis, defined as fluid collection in the setting of documented pancreatic necrosis that contains necrotic material and encased within a partial or complete wall. 3. Documented or suspected infected necrotizing pancreatitis 1) Documented infected necrotizing pancreatitis, defined as: i. Positive culture obtained with percutaneous fine needle aspiration from the pancreatic necrotic collection (if intervention is undertaken ≤14 days of onset of acute pancreatitis) ii. OR gas in the necrotic collection on imaging at any time. 2) Suspected infected necrotizing pancreatitis, if \>14 days after onset of disease, defined as: i. Persistent organ failure in patients admitted to the ICU ii. OR presence of at least three of the following six clinical/laboratory parameters (SIRS criteria or elevated CRP or elevated procalcitonin) with no other infection focus. These clinical criteria are considered sufficiently reliable only after the initial 14 days of acute pancreatitis: 1. Temperature \>100.4 °F or \<96.8 °F 2. Heart rate \> 90 beats/min 3. Respiratory rate \>20 breaths/min or PaCO2 \< 32 mmHg 4. WBC count \>12,000/mm³, or \<4,000/mm³, or more than 10% immature band cells 5. CRP ≥ 30mg/L 6. Procalcitonin ≥ 1ng/mL 4. Endoscopic drainage of the necrotic collection is technically feasible as deemed by the treating physician. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Age \< 18 years 2. \> 26 days after the onset of acute pancreatitis 3. Indication for emergency laparotomy for abdominal catastrophe (e.g. bleeding, bowel perforation, abdominal compartment syndrome). 4. Necrotic collection is not amenable for endoscopic intervention. 5. Pregnancy. 6. Unable to obtain informed consent from the patient or legally authorized representative.
Where it's running
-
Orlando Health Digestive Health Institute
Orlando, Florida, United States Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Ji Young Bang, MD MPH — Orlando Health
- Study coordinator: Ji Young Bang, MD MPH
- Email: jiyoung.bang@orlandohealth.com
- Phone: 321-842-2273
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Comparing immediate necrosectomy to a step-up approach for treating walled-off necrosis
This study is testing whether a quick procedure to remove walled-off necrosis can help people with symptoms from acute pancreatitis recover faster than the usual step-by-step treatment.
-
EUS-guided pancreaticobiliary procedures with the RIVOS access device
This study tests how the RIVOS EUS access device performs during interventional procedures for pancreatic and bile duct problems in adults.
-
Percutaneous vs. Endoscopic Gallbladder Drainage for those who aren’t surgery candidates
This randomized trial tests two less-invasive gallbladder drainage methods to see which works better for people with acute gallbladder infection who aren’t candidates for surgery.
-
Next-Gen Fluoroscopy System vs Conventional System in Endoscopy
This trial tests whether a next-generation fluoroscopy system lowers radiation exposure for patients and staff during fluoroscopy-guided endoscopic procedures.
-
4-anchor internal brace repair for perilunate dislocations
We will test if a 4-anchor internal brace repair leads to better healing and fewer complications than standard K-wire fixation in adults who have had surgical fixation for a perilunate dislocation.
-
CoNextions device versus L-O suture repair for flexor tendon lacerations
This trial will test whether the CoNextions tendon repair device or the standard L-O suture repair leads to fewer ruptures and complications in adults aged 22 and older with Zone 2-5 flexor tendon lacerations.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.