Wearable ankle robot therapy for post-stroke foot drop
Official title: Portable Ankle Robotics to Reverse Foot Drop After Stroke
Run by NextStep Robotics Inc. · NCT04594837 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study will test whether adding a wearable ankle robot to physical therapy helps adults with post-stroke foot drop walk better than physical therapy alone.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 140 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | NextStep Robotics Inc. Industry-sponsored |
| Locations | 1 site (Baltimore, Maryland) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | August 20, 2020 |
| Main results expected | February 28, 2025 |
| Study ends | February 28, 2025 |
| Registry record updated | January 26, 2023 |
| Trial ID | NCT04594837 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults (age 18+) with hemiparetic gait and persistent foot drop in the subacute (>6 weeks to <6 months) or chronic (>6 months) phase after stroke who can participate in over-ground gait training are ideal candidates.
✕Probably not a fit
People with unstable cardiac disease, severe medical or orthopedic conditions that substantially alter gait, or those unable to participate in over-ground walking sessions are unlikely to benefit from this intervention.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
Participants with hemiparetic foot drop from recent or prior stroke are randomized to 9 weeks (18 sessions) of robot-assisted physical therapy using a portable ankle device (AMBLE) or to conventional physical therapy without the robot. Therapy is delivered during over-ground mobility training and the robot provides timely, step-by-step assistance to shape ankle dorsiflexion and motor learning. Primary outcomes include gait biomechanics (ankle angle at initial contact, peak swing ankle angle, percent heel-first strikes, gait velocity) and blinded clinician measures of dorsiflexion range, ankle strength, and assistive device needs. The design includes subacute and chronic stroke cohorts and a crossover subgroup to examine durability and generalizability of effects.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the device could improve ankle lifting and walking speed, reduce reliance on braces or canes, and lower fall risk for people with post-stroke foot drop.
How similar studies have gone: Previous robot-assisted gait and ankle-assist approaches have shown promising improvements in ankle function and walking in some studies, but portable over-ground ankle robotics remain less extensively studied.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Ages 18 and older * In the subacute phase of stroke recovery (\>6 weeks to \<6 months post-stroke) with residual hemiparesis of the lower extremity that includes symptoms of foot-drop. - or - In the chronic phase of stroke recovery (\>6 months post-stroke) with residual hemiparesis of the lower extremity that includes symptoms of foot-drop. * Clear indications of hemiparetic gait by clinical observation Exclusion Criteria: * Cardiac history of (a) unstable angina, (b) recent (less than 3 months) myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure (NYHA category II); (c) hemodynamically significant valvular dysfunction * Hypertension that is a contraindication for routine physical therapy (greater than 160/100 on two assessments). * Medical History: (a) recent hospitalization (less than 3 months) for severe medical disease, (b) symptomatic peripheral arterial occlusive disease, (c) orthopedic or chronic pain conditions that significantly alter gait function, (d) pulmonary or renal failure (e) active cancer * History of non-stroke neuromuscular disorder restricting gait. * Aphasia or cognitive functioning that confounds participation, defined as unable to follow 2 step commands or judgment of the medical officer or therapist.
Where it's running
-
University of Maryland Rehabilitation & Orthopaedic Institute
Baltimore, Maryland, United States Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Josh Rudnicki
- Email: JRudnicki@som.umaryland.edu
- Phone: 443-869-3518
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Quadriceps muscle activity and gait in people after stroke with stiff-knee gait vs healthy controls
We will test whether quadriceps muscle activity and walking movement differ between adults with post-stroke stiff-knee gait and healthy adults.
-
Home-based vs. in-clinic upper extremity rehabilitation after stroke
This study tests whether a 20-hour home telerehabilitation program (tele-CPASS) works as well as the same in-clinic CPASS therapy for improving arm and hand function after stroke.
-
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to improve heart-autonomic function after stroke
This test adds rTMS to usual neurological rehabilitation to see if it improves heart rate variability, autonomic symptoms, arm strength, and quality of life in people at least three months after a stroke.
-
Spatial StimelMD for upper-limb recovery after stroke or traumatic brain injury
This trial will test whether adding the Spatial StimelMD device to standard rehabilitation helps adults with upper-limb weakness after stroke or traumatic brain injury improve arm movement.
-
Deep phenotyping to explore recovery in young adults after stroke
This project will test whether a detailed health and sample-collection approach (deep phenotyping) is practical and acceptable for people aged 18–55 who have had a stroke.
-
Wrist-worn device to encourage use of the weaker arm after a recent stroke
This trial tests whether a wrist-worn sensor system plus motor and behavioral home coaching helps people 1–6 months after a stroke with moderate arm weakness use their affected arm more than a usual home-exercise program.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.