Volar locking plate versus external fixator for distal intra-articular radius fractures
Official title: Comparison of the Outcomes of Volar Locking Plate Versus External Fixator in Distal Intra-articular Radius Fractures.
Run by RESnTEC, Institute of Research · NCT07576075 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This will test whether volar locking plates or external fixators help adults aged 20–60 with recent intra‑articular distal radius fractures recover function sooner.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 20 Years to 60 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 60 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | RESnTEC, Institute of Research Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Bahawalpur, Punjab Province) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | October 5, 2025 |
| Main results expected | June 30, 2026 |
| Study ends | June 30, 2026 |
| Registry record updated | May 8, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07576075 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults aged 20 to 60 with a unilateral intra‑articular distal radius fracture of less than seven days' duration who do not have open or bilateral fractures and who are not immunosuppressed or medically uncontrolled.
✕Probably not a fit
People with bilateral or open distal radius fractures, additional related injuries, those on immunosuppressive/chemotherapy/corticosteroid therapy, or those with uncontrolled medical comorbidities (for example uncontrolled diabetes or hypertension) are excluded and likely would not benefit from participation.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
Local results on treating distal intra‑articular radius fractures with volar locking plates versus external fixators have been conflicting, so this interventional comparison enrolls eligible patients presenting within seven days of injury. Participants will receive either a volar locking plate or an external fixator as the chosen fixation method and be followed after surgery for early functional recovery, anatomical reduction, and complication rates. Outcomes of interest include range of motion, pain, return to daily activities, and adverse events related to the procedure. The goal is to generate local outcome data that can guide choice of fixation and improve mobilization and quality of life.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If one method shows faster functional recovery and fewer complications, patients could return to daily activities sooner with fewer treatment‑related problems.
How similar studies have gone: Previous studies have reported mixed results, with some showing earlier functional gains with volar plates and others finding similar outcomes between plates and external fixation, so the approach is established but not conclusively resolved.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Any gender * Aged 20 to 60 * with intra-articular fractures of the distal radius * The fracture lasted less than seven days Exclusion Criteria: * Patients with bilateral distal radius fractures and any further related injuries or fractures * Distal radius open fractures * Individuals receiving immunosuppressive, chemotherapeutic, or corticosteroid medications (based on medical history and records) * Individuals with underlying medical co-morbidities, such as diabetes and uncontrolled hypertension, (determined by their medical history and record)
Where it's running
-
Bahawal Victoria Hospital
Bahawalpur, Punjab Province, Pakistan Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Burhan Ulhaq — Bahawal Victoria Hospital/Quid-e-Azam Medical College, Bahawalpur
- Study coordinator: Burhan Ulhaq
- Email: burhankhan224@gmail.com
- Phone: +923326456246
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Magnesium sulfate added to standard therapy for acute organophosphate poisoning
This study tests whether adding magnesium sulfate to standard treatment helps people with organophosphate poisoning see better outcomes.
-
Percutaneous Achilles tenotomy versus open tendo‑Achilles lengthening for neglected clubfoot in young children
This project tests whether percutaneous Achilles tenotomy or open tendo‑Achilles lengthening gives better function for children aged 2–5 with neglected clubfoot.
-
L-carnitine for preterm babies with respiratory distress syndrome
This will see if giving L-carnitine to preterm babies with respiratory distress helps them gain weight, leave the hospital sooner, or survive the early newborn period.
-
Flunarizine versus propranolol for preventing migraines in children
This trial will test whether flunarizine or propranolol better reduces migraine attacks in children aged 8 to 15.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.