Using procalcitonin changes versus single procalcitonin values to reduce unnecessary antibiotics in ICU patients
Official title: KInetics of Procalcitonin to Reduce Unnecessary aNtibiotic Use (KIPRUN) - Protocol for a Multi-center, Randomized, Superiority Trial to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Procalcitonin Kinetics-guided and Absolute Procalcitonin Value-guided Antibiotic Initiation in Reducing Unnecessary Antibiotic Therapy in Critically Ill Patients
Run by Semmelweis University · NCT07211620 · Data updated 2026-11-12
We will try to see if using daily changes in procalcitonin instead of a single procalcitonin cutoff can safely reduce unnecessary antibiotics in critically ill patients with suspected infection.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 250 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Semmelweis University Academic / other |
| Locations | 2 sites (Budapest and 1 other locations) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | November 6, 2025 |
| Main results expected | December 2027 |
| Study ends | December 2027 |
| Registry record updated | November 3, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07211620 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults in the ICU who are hemodynamically stable with suspected new-onset infection and who have two PCT measurements taken about 24 hours apart are ideal candidates.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients in septic shock or those with infections expected to require long-term antibiotic therapy are unlikely to benefit from this PCT-guided initiation approach.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
Hemodynamically stable adult ICU patients with suspected new-onset infection who have two recent procalcitonin (PCT) measurements are assigned to one of two predefined antibiotic-initiation protocols: one based on an absolute PCT value and the other based on the 24-hour change (kinetics) in PCT. All participants undergo standard microbiological sampling and source control as indicated, and antibiotic decisions are made according to the assigned PCT protocol combined with the clinical picture. After 72 hours of treatment an independent multidisciplinary team reviews clinical and microbiology results to decide on ongoing therapy. The study compares antibiotic use and safety outcomes between the two guidance approaches.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this approach could lower unnecessary antibiotic exposure and its harms (side effects and resistance) while preserving patient safety.
How similar studies have gone: Previous randomized trials have shown that PCT-guided strategies can safely shorten antibiotic duration, but using PCT kinetics to guide the start of antibiotics is less studied and remains relatively novel.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Adult (18 years \< ) non-surgical, surgical, or trauma patients * Suspected new-onset infection on admission or during ICU stay * The source of infection is known or highly suspected, and source control has been implemented if needed (i.e., removal of an infected device (e.g., central line, endoprosthesis) * Two PCT values are available - one on the day of suspicion of infection and one 24±4 hours earlier. * Microbiology sampling has to be performed (according to all presumed sources - blood culture -aerobic and anaerobic, lower respiratory tract sample (tracheal aspirate/bronchoalveolar lavage), urine, etc.). * Written informed consent of the patient (or legal guardian if the patient cannot provide consent) Exclusion Criteria: * Septic shock (hypotension requiring vasopressor therapy to maintain mean blood pressure of 65 mmHg or greater and having a serum lactate level greater than 2 mmol/L after adequate fluid resuscitation) * Infections for which long-term antibiotic treatment is strongly recommended (e.g., infective endocarditis, osteoarticular infections, chronic prostatitis, tuberculosis) * Infections related to primary surgical intervention and adequate source control cannot be guaranteed (e.g., fecal peritonitis, pancreatic necrosectomy, infective necrotizing fascitis - i.e., Fournier's gangrene), * Indisputable infections (e.g., hepatic abscess, empyema) * Poor chance of survival (i.e., expected ICU stay less than 24 hours or initial Acute Physiology and Health Evaluation Score II (APACHE II) \>30) * Admissions after cardiopulmonary resuscitation * Severe immunosuppression other than steroid use * stem-cell transplant recipients * solid organ transplant patients * HIV infection with a CD4 count of less than 200 cells/mm3 * Neutropenia with less than 500 neutrophils/mm3 * Patients on ABs within 72 hours before inclusion * Patients in pregnancy or breastfeeding. Women of childbearing age will be screened by a urine pregnancy test before inclusion in the study.
Where it's running
-
Semmelweis University, Department of Intensive Therapy
Budapest, Hungary Recruiting -
Saint Margaret's Hospital
Budapest, Hungary Not yet recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Márton Papp
- Email: papp.marton@semmelweis.hu
- Phone: +36206663224
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Ruta C and Vitamin C in Sepsis: Adding antioxidants to standard care
This trial tests whether adding Ruta C (rutin plus vitamin C) or vitamin C alone to standard sepsis treatment helps adults in the ICU stay shorter and recover better.
-
Early detection of sepsis-related blood clotting problems in severe burn patients
This study tests how well the JAAM-2 score can detect sepsis-induced coagulopathy early in adults with severe burns who develop sepsis in the ICU.
-
Neutrophil EMR3 as a biomarker for sepsis in ICU patients
Researchers will test whether measuring EMR3 on neutrophils helps diagnose sepsis, monitor progression, and predict outcomes in adults in Chinese ICUs.
-
Thymalfasin added to standard care for adults with sepsis and immune dysfunction
This study tests whether thymosin alpha-1 helps restore immune function in adults with sepsis who have weakened immunity.
-
Multicenter group study of sepsis and ARDS in China
This study tests how sepsis and ARDS differ among adults across several Chinese hospitals and builds a biobank to understand why some patients do better or worse.
-
Non-invasive hemodynamic guidance for sepsis care on medical wards
This trial tests whether guiding fluid and vasopressor therapy for sepsis using non-invasive hemodynamic measurements works better than standard care.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.