Using femoral vein size to predict low blood pressure after spinal anesthesia in older adults having orthopedic surgery
Official title: Evaluation of Femoral Vein Diameter to Predict Intraoperative Hypotension in Geriatric Patients Undergoing Orthopedic Surgery Under Spinal Anesthesia: A Prospective Observational Study
Run by Cairo University · NCT07339475 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This test will see if the width of the right common femoral vein on ultrasound can predict drops in blood pressure after spinal anesthesia in people over 60 having elective lower-limb orthopedic surgery.
Quick facts
| Study type | Observational |
|---|---|
| Ages | 60 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 43 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Cairo University Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Cairo) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | December 1, 2025 |
| Main results expected | July 1, 2026 |
| Study ends | July 1, 2026 |
| Registry record updated | January 14, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07339475 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are adults older than 60, ASA physical status I–II, BMI ≤35, scheduled for elective lower-limb orthopedic surgery under spinal anesthesia and willing to undergo a preoperative femoral vein ultrasound.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients unlikely to benefit include those with BMI >35, contraindications to spinal anesthesia (for example coagulopathy or active infection at the puncture site), emergency surgeries, or those not receiving spinal anesthesia.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This observational study will measure the transverse diameter of the right common femoral vein (RCFV) in the inguinal region by ultrasound before spinal anesthesia and track blood pressure changes during elective lower-limb orthopedic operations in patients over 60. Investigators will enroll ASA I–II patients with BMI ≤35 and record perioperative hemodynamics to determine whether a smaller or larger RCFV correlates with post-spinal hypotension. The protocol uses bedside ultrasound as a noninvasive marker of intravascular volume status and compares the RCFV measurement with observed blood pressure drops after spinal block. The work builds on obstetric data and aims to test the method's applicability in a geriatric surgical population.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, a quick bedside femoral vein ultrasound could help clinicians identify older patients at higher risk of blood pressure drops after spinal anesthesia so they can plan monitoring or preventive measures.
How similar studies have gone: Previous studies—mostly in cesarean delivery populations—have shown promising results using femoral or venous ultrasound measures to predict post-spinal hypotension, but evidence in geriatric orthopedic patients is limited.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Age \> 60 years. * American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical state I-II. * Body mass index (BMI) ≤35 kg/m². Patients above this value will be excluded because obesity may cause technical difficulty and poor image quality in femoral vein ultrasound assessment. * Elective lower-limb orthopedic surgery under spinal anesthesia. Exclusion Criteria: * Patients refusing to participate. * History of psychiatric illness or seizures. * Absolute contraindications to spinal anesthesia: infection at the puncture site, severe coagulopathy/anticoagulation \[defined as platelet count \<75,000/µL, International Normalized Ratio (INR) \>1.5, Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (aPTT) \>1.5 times control, or the use of anticoagulants such as warfarin, heparin, low molecular weight heparin, or direct oral anticoagulants within the recommended safety interval for neuraxial anesthesia\], severe hypovolemia, increased intracranial pressure, or known allergy to local anesthetics. * Severe cardiac disease, including left ventricular ejection fraction \<30%, Severe valvular heart disease (e.g., critical aortic stenosis), clinically significant arrhythmias (atrial fibrillation with uncontrolled ventricular rate \>120 bpm, frequent ventricular ectopy or sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia) and congestive heart failure such as New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III-IV. * Severe uncontrolled hypertension, defined as persistent mean arterial pressure (MAP) ≥120 mmHg or systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥180 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≥110 mmHg despite medical therapy. * Severe respiratory diseases (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) stage III-IV chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or forced vital capacity (FVC) \<50% predicted). * Baseline bradycardia (\<50) or mean arterial blood pressure less than 60mmHg. * Emergency surgeries.
Where it's running
-
Cairo University
Cairo, Egypt Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Hebatullah S Abdelhamid, MD
- Email: drhebasalah593@gmail.com
- Phone: 00201044512277
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Modified Saddle Block vs Spinal Anesthesia for TURP
This study tests whether a modified saddle block or a standard spinal anesthesia better controls blood pressure during TURP for adults 40–90.
-
Dexamethasone and Spinal Block Duration in Lower Abdominal Surgery
This study tests whether giving dexamethasone before spinal anesthesia can lengthen how long the numbness lasts for adults having lower abdominal surgery.
-
Remimazolam vs propofol for stable blood pressure during thoracic/abdominal endovascular aortic repair
This trial tests whether remimazolam keeps blood pressure steadier than propofol during TEVAR or EVAR in adults.
-
Unilateral vs. Bilateral Spinal Anesthesia for Hip Replacement in Older Adults
This trial tests whether unilateral spinal anesthesia provides better hemodynamic stability than bilateral spinal anesthesia in people 65 and older undergoing hip replacement.
-
Remimazolam vs. Propofol for Maintaining Anesthesia During Major Liver Resection
This study tests whether remimazolam keeps blood pressure steadier than propofol during major liver surgery in adults.
-
Remimazolam versus Midazolam for anesthesia induction in older adults
This observational study compares remimazolam and midazolam when inducing anesthesia in people aged 65 and older undergoing elective non-cardiac surgery to see which provides better stability and safety.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.