Using a pulsed-field balloon catheter to isolate pulmonary veins for atrial fibrillation
Official title: IsoLation of PuLmonary Vein oUtcome Using a coMbIned Pulse Field Energy and ballooN cAtheTEr in Atrial Fibrillation
Run by AZ Sint-Jan AV · NCT07156877 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This trial will test whether pulsed field ablation with the VOLT balloon catheter works as well as standard thermal ablation for adults having their first pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 136 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | AZ Sint-Jan AV Academic / other |
| Locations | 2 sites (Bruges and 1 other locations) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | December 5, 2025 |
| Main results expected | December 31, 2028 |
| Study ends | December 31, 2028 |
| Registry record updated | May 12, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07156877 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults (≥18) with documented paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation (≤12 months), who are candidates for first-time pulmonary vein isolation and meet the study's anticoagulation and safety requirements, are ideal candidates.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with prior left atrial ablation or surgery, long-standing persistent AF (>12 months), intracardiac thrombus, prior pulmonary vein stenosis or stenting, existing diaphragmatic paralysis, or other listed exclusions are unlikely to benefit from participation.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
The trial randomizes adults undergoing their first pulmonary vein isolation 1:1 to receive pulsed field ablation (PFA) with the novel VOLT balloon catheter or to receive standard thermal ablation (radiofrequency or cryoballoon). The main effectiveness outcome is recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias between 2 and 12 months after the procedure, and safety monitoring focuses on serious complications such as cardiac tamponade, stroke, and phrenic nerve injury. Procedures follow standard peri‑procedural anticoagulation and imaging practices to exclude atrial thrombus, with protocolized follow-up rhythm monitoring. The design tests whether PFA is non-inferior to thermal ablation in maintaining rhythm while comparing complication rates.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the VOLT pulsed field approach could offer similar or better rhythm control with fewer thermal-related complications and potentially faster recovery.
How similar studies have gone: Early nonrandomized and small randomized studies of pulsed field ablation have shown promising efficacy and reduced collateral injury compared with thermal methods, but large randomized evidence remains limited.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation documented on a 12 lead electrocardiogram or Holter monitor (lasting ≥30 seconds) within the last 24 months. * Candidate for ablation based on current AF guidelines * Continuous anticoagulation with Vitamin-K-Antagonists or a non-vitamin K antagonist anticoagulant (NOAC) for ≥4 weeks prior to the ablation; or a transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) and/or computed tomography (CT) that excludes left atrial thrombus ≤48 hours before ablation * Age of 18 years or older on the date of consent * Informed consent as documented by signature Exclusion Criteria: * History of left atrial (LA) ablation or surgery involving the LA * Persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) lasting longer than 12 months * AF resulting from temporary or reversible causes * Presence of thrombus within the heart chambers * Prior pulmonary vein (PV) stenosis or stenting * Existing paralysis of one side of the diaphragm * Known allergy or contraindication to anticoagulant medication or contrast agents * History of mitral valve surgery * Significant mitral valve disease * Myocardial infarction occurring within three months prior to informed consent * Current use of triple antithrombotic therapy * Cardiac surgery within the past three months or a scheduled cardiac surgery or TAVI * Major congenital heart abnormalities * Congestive heart failure classified as NYHA class III or IV * Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) less than 35% * Diagnosed hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (wall thickness exceeding 1.7 cm) * Severe chronic kidney disease (eGFR below 30 ml/min) * Uncontrolled hyperthyroidism * Stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within three months before consent * Active systemic infections * History of cryoglobulinemia * Diagnosed cardiac amyloidosis * Current pregnancy * Estimated life expectancy under one year, as judged by the treating physician * Enrollment in another clinical study that may interfere with this trial's outcomes * Inability or unwillingness to adhere to study requirements and follow-up visits
Where it's running
-
AZ Sint-Jan Brugge AV
Bruges, Belgium Recruiting -
UZ Brussel
Jette, Belgium Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Sébastien Knecht, MD, PhD — AZ Sint-Jan Brugge AV
- Study coordinator: Emma Christiaen, PhD
- Email: emma.christiaen@azsintjan.be
- Phone: +32 50453293
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Pulsed Field vs Cryoballoon for Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Atrial Fibrillation
This trial tests whether pulsed field ablation can shorten the procedure for first-time PVI in AF patients compared with cryoballoon ablation, while keeping safety and effectiveness similar.
-
Pulsed Field Ablation vs Cryoablation for Atrial Fibrillation Under Deep Sedation
This trial tests whether pulsed field ablation (PFA) done under deep sedation works as well as cryoballoon ablation for treating atrial fibrillation, aiming to avoid general anesthesia.
-
Bachmann’s Bundle Pacing vs Right Atrial Appendage Pacing for AF
This study tests two common atrial pacing methods to see which one is safer over 12 months for people getting a new pacemaker, ICD, or CRT device.
-
AI-powered ECG to help diagnose and predict outcomes in heart disease
Researchers test an AI-enhanced ECG to help diagnose and predict outcomes for people with cardiovascular diseases.
-
Pace-and-ablate strategy in atrial fibrillation: who benefits and long-term outcomes
This study looks at adults with atrial fibrillation who underwent AV node ablation with permanent pacing to see who develops pacing-induced problems and how they do long-term.
-
AI-based cardiac analysis using 12-lead and 1-lead ECG
A clinician-facing pilot test to see if SmartECG-EF helps evaluate heart function using both 12-lead and single-lead ECGs in adults with heart conditions.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.