Understanding motor recovery after stroke
Official title: Defining the Trajectory of Motor Recovery After Stroke
Run by Massachusetts General Hospital · NCT03485040 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is tracking how people recover movement in their arms after a stroke to see what helps them get better and to improve rehabilitation methods.
Quick facts
| Study type | Observational |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 90 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 300 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Massachusetts General Hospital Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Boston, Massachusetts) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | June 9, 2017 |
| Main results expected | June 30, 2025 |
| Study ends | June 30, 2027 |
| Registry record updated | May 15, 2025 |
| Trial ID | NCT03485040 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates for this study are adults aged 18 to 90 who have upper extremity motor weakness following an ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with prior neurological or psychiatric disorders that result in functional disability may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
The Stroke Motor Rehabilitation and Recovery Study (SMaHRT) is a longitudinal observational study that aims to track the natural history of upper extremity motor recovery following ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes. Participants will be enrolled during their acute hospitalization and will undergo a series of research visits at various intervals post-stroke, including 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, one year, two years, and three years. The study will gather a wide range of data, including demographics, clinical outcomes, neuroimaging, and neurophysiological assessments, to better understand the factors influencing motor recovery and to develop personalized rehabilitation strategies. The ultimate goal is to enhance neurorehabilitation techniques and improve recovery outcomes for stroke patients.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could lead to improved rehabilitation strategies and better recovery outcomes for stroke patients.
How similar studies have gone: Other studies focusing on motor recovery after stroke have shown promise, but this specific approach is novel in its comprehensive data collection and longitudinal design.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria * Age 18 - 90 * Upper extremity motor weakness after ischemic and/or hemorrhagic stroke as defined by a score of \>=1 on NIH Stroke Scale Arm Motor Drift Questions 5A or 5B * Ability to follow simple commands in English * Score of zero or 1 on the NIH Stroke Scale Level of Consciousness Questions 1a and 1b and a score of zero on the NIH Stroke Scale Level of Consciousness Question 1c. * Stable medical status as determined by primary care team * Inpatient on the MGH stroke neurology service Exclusion Criteria * Prior history of developmental, neurologic, or major psychiatric disorder resulting in functional disability * Prior history of visual or auditory disorders limiting ability to participate in testing * Evidence of an uncontrolled seizure disorder * Patients for whom EEG leads are contraindicated
Where it's running
-
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: David J Lin, MD — Neurologist
- Study coordinator: Julie A DiCarlo, MS
- Email: jdicarlo2@mgh.harvard.edu
- Phone: 617-726-1311
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Paired VNS: How the Brain and Pupils Respond in Stroke Patients
This study tests real-time physiologic responses to paired VNS in adults with chronic motor impairment after ischemic stroke to help tailor dosing.
-
NeuroAiD test in mild to moderate ischemic stroke patients
This study tests whether adding MLC901 (NeuroAiD II) to standard stroke care helps adults who recently had an ischemic stroke recover better than standard care alone.
-
Using IMPROVE to guide carotid revascularisation decisions
This trial tests whether using the IMPROVE MRI-based score to select patients for carotid revascularisation is as good as standard care based mainly on stenosis degree, among people who have had a recent stroke or TIA due to carotid disease.
-
High-intensity interval versus moderate continuous exercise for stroke-related muscle loss
This will test whether high-intensity interval training (HIIT) or moderate-intensity continuous training (MCIT) better helps people 1–6 months after an ischemic stroke who have muscle loss regain muscle mass, strength, walking ability, and quality of life.
-
Test of adding a very low-dose edoxaban to standard antiplatelet therapy to prevent another stroke in adults 75 and older
This trial tests whether adding a tiny amount of edoxaban to aspirin or clopidogrel can better prevent a second stroke in people aged 75+ who recently had an ischemic stroke.
-
HR-MRI–Directed Tirofiban Therapy for Late-Window ICAS-LAA Stroke
We’re testing whether tirofiban plus dual antiplatelet therapy, guided by high-resolution MRI of the brain’s blood vessels, can help people with intracranial large-artery atherosclerosis strokes that begin more than 24 hours after onset.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.