Ultrasonic versus conventional clipping hemostasis for laparoscopic colon cancer surgery
Official title: Clipless Ultrasonic Energy-based Hemostasis Versus Conventional Clipping Hemostasis in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: A Pilot Study
Run by Yonsei University · NCT07129512 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This trial tests whether using an ultrasonic scalpel instead of clips for vessel control during laparoscopic colon cancer surgery reduces bleeding and speeds recovery for adult patients.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 19 Years to 80 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 304 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Yonsei University Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Seoul) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | March 4, 2024 |
| Main results expected | September 1, 2025 |
| Study ends | September 24, 2025 |
| Registry record updated | August 19, 2025 |
| Trial ID | NCT07129512 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults aged 19–80 with histologically confirmed colon adenocarcinoma, ECOG 0–2, ASA I–III, no prior abdominal malignancy surgery, not taking anticoagulants, and eligible for elective laparoscopic colectomy are ideal candidates.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with ASA ≥4, significant coagulation disorders, current anticoagulant use, emergency surgery, pregnancy, or inability to complete follow-up are unlikely to benefit from this protocol.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This single-center, prospective, randomized study in Seoul compares clipless hemostasis using an ultrasonic energy device to conventional clipping with monopolar energy in elective laparoscopic colectomy for colon adenocarcinoma. Patients are randomized 1:1 in the operating room after anesthesia and followed for 30 days postoperatively with standard surveillance thereafter. Primary outcomes include postoperative bleeding frequency and intraoperative bleeding measures, and secondary outcomes include drain output and length of hospital stay. Enrollment is planned over about 18 months with total study duration near five years.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this approach could reduce intraoperative and postoperative bleeding, lower complication rates, and shorten hospital stays for patients having laparoscopic colon cancer surgery.
How similar studies have gone: Ultrasonic energy devices have demonstrated safety and efficacy in various abdominal and laparoscopic procedures, but prospective randomized data specifically for laparoscopic colorectal cancer resections are limited.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Adults 19 to 80 years of age * Patients with histologically confirmed pathologic adenocarcinoma of the colon * Patients with an ECOG score between 0 and 2 * Patients with a preoperative ASA score of I to III * Patients without a history of surgery for abdominal malignancies * Patients with no history of anticoagulation prior to surgery * Patients who understand the study process and treatment plan and are able to complete the informed consent form themselves Exclusion Criteria: * Patients with an ASA score of 4 or higher * People with blood clotting disorders such as liver cirrhosis, end-stage renal failure, or hematologic disorders * Pregnant women * Mentally ill patients who have difficulty giving informed consent * Preoperative blood hemoglobin (Hb) less than 7 g/dL * Patients taking anticoagulants before or after surgery * Patients who have undergone emergency surgery * Patients who are unable to be followed up on an outpatient basi * No Informed consent
Where it's running
-
Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine
Seoul, South Korea Recruiting
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Comparing 5-year and 10-year colonoscopy schedules for patients with non-advanced adenomas
This study is testing whether people with 1 to 2 non-advanced polyps can safely have colonoscopies every 10 years instead of every 5 years without raising their risk of colorectal cancer.
-
Biopsy to study tumor changes after radioembolization
This study is trying to see how tumors in patients with colorectal cancer that has spread to the liver change after they receive a specific radiation treatment called radioembolization.
-
Testing stool samples for cancer detection in colorectal cancer survivors
This study is testing if a new stool test can help find polyps and cancer in colorectal cancer survivors to see if it works better than regular check-ups.
-
Postoperative ctDNA Monitoring to Predict Recurrence in Driver-Mutant Stage I-III Colon Cancer
This study tests whether checking blood tumor DNA after surgery can predict if driver-mutant stage I-III colon cancer will come back.
-
Adding tolecizumab to chemoimmunotherapy before surgery for locally advanced pMMR/MSS colon cancer
We're testing whether adding tolecizumab (a PCSK9 blocker) to sintilimab plus CapeOX before surgery helps people with pMMR/MSS locally advanced colon cancer (cT3c or higher) achieve a complete tumor response.
-
Family genetics: who shares test results with relatives
This study tests whether letting patients share genetic results with their relatives is as good as doctors sharing the results to help first-degree relatives get genetic testing for hereditary cancer risk.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.