Tyler Twist versus traditional eccentric wrist extensor exercises for lateral epicondylalgia
Official title: Effects of the Tyler Twist Versus Eccentric Exercises in Patients With Lateral Epicondylagia
Run by Riphah International University · NCT07626632 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study tests whether the Tyler Twist is better than standard eccentric wrist extensor exercises for reducing elbow pain and improving grip and function in adults with lateral epicondylalgia.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 20 Years to 40 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 38 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Riphah International University Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Lahore, Punjab Province) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | August 1, 2026 |
| Main results expected | October 20, 2026 |
| Study ends | November 13, 2026 |
| Registry record updated | September 24, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07626632 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults aged 20–40 with subacute to chronic lateral epicondylalgia and positive Cozen’s, Mill’s, or Maudsley tests, and pain during activity with grip or resisted wrist extension.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients without or with very mild symptoms, acute elbow injury, or those who have had recent corticosteroid injections may see no benefit or be unsuitable.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This interventional study compares two exercise approaches for lateral epicondylalgia. Participants with subacute to chronic symptoms will be randomized to perform either Tyler Twist exercises or traditional eccentric wrist extensor exercises. Outcomes include pain during activity, grip strength, and functional measures over a defined treatment period. The Tyler Twist uses a TheraBand FlexBar to provide both eccentric and concentric loading in a controlled, functional manner. Prior evidence suggests benefit from eccentric training, but direct comparisons with Tyler Twist are limited, making this head-to-head trial important for guiding conservative management.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, patients could experience greater pain relief and improved hand function with the Tyler Twist approach.
How similar studies have gone: Previous studies support eccentric training for tendinopathy; direct head-to-head comparisons with Tyler Twist are limited, so this study addresses a gap in evidence.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * ● Males and female patients suffering from lateral epicondylagia in subacute and chronic phase. * Age between 20yrs-40yrs. * Patients screened with positive Cozen's test, positive Mill's test, positive Maudsley's test \[14\]. * NPRS pain score ≥ 4 on activity. * Tenderness on palpation over the lateral epicondyle of humerus, * Pain with gripping, Pain with resisted wrist extension. Exclusion Criteria: * History of recent trauma or surgery of elbow. * Acute stage of lateral epicondylagia. * Corticosteroid injection within the last 3 months. * Neurological defeciency of the affected limb \[16\]. * Systemic inflammatory diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, or fibromyalgia. * Diabetes mellitus (uncontrolled) due to its influence on tendinopathy.
Where it's running
-
Ghurki Hospital Lahore
Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Hira Shaukat, Mphill — Riphah International University
- Study coordinator: Imran Amjad, PhD
- Email: Imran.amjad@riphah.edu.pk
- Phone: 03324390125
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Telerehabilitation vs. supervised rehabilitation for patellofemoral pain syndrome
This study tests whether remote exercise therapy can work as well as in-person supervised rehab for people with patellofemoral pain.
-
Vestibular Stimulation vs Core Stability Training for Sitting Balance in Hypotonic Cerebral Palsy
This study tests whether vestibular stimulation or core stability training helps improve sitting balance in young children with hypotonic cerebral palsy.
-
Hybrid mobile health and telerehabilitation vs in-person physiotherapy for shoulder pain
This study tests whether a mobile-health program, tele-rehabilitation sessions, or conventional physiotherapy can help adults with Subacromial Pain Syndrome.
-
Telerehabilitation vs clinic-based physiotherapy for children with spastic cerebral palsy
This study tests whether structured telerehabilitation can be as effective as in-clinic physiotherapy for improving movement in children aged 4–12 with spastic cerebral palsy.
-
tDCS plus Action Observation Therapy for leg function in children with diplegic CP
This study tests whether adding active brain stimulation to action observation therapy can improve leg movement in kids with diplegic cerebral palsy better than a sham stimulation with the same therapy.
-
Sensory Integration Therapy vs Conventional Physical Therapy in Children With Mixed Cerebral Palsy
This study tests whether Sensory Integration Therapy helps improve gross motor function more than standard physical therapy in children aged 4–10 with mixed cerebral palsy.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.