TROPIS versus Coring-Out Fistulectomy for High Anal Fistulas

Early Results of Transanal Opening of the Intersphincteric Space (TROPIS) Versus Coring Out Fistulectomy in Management of High Anal Fistulas: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Not applicable Interventional Cairo University · NCT07334678

This compares TROPIS and coring-out fistulectomy to see which heals high anal fistulas better and causes less fecal incontinence in adults.

Quick facts

PhaseNot applicable
Study typeInterventional
Enrollment64 (estimated)
Ages18 Years and up
SexAll
SponsorCairo University Academic / other
Drugs / interventionsradiation
Locations1 site (Cairo, Al-Manial Cairo)
Trial IDNCT07334678 on ClinicalTrials.gov

What this trial studies

This is a prospective randomized clinical trial at Cairo University comparing two sphincter-preserving surgical techniques for high anal fistulas: Transanal Opening of the Intersphincteric Space (TROPIS) and coring-out fistulectomy. Eligible adult patients with high fistulas (involving more than one-third of the sphincter complex), whether primary or recurrent, are randomized to undergo one of the two procedures and followed postoperatively. The primary outcome is failure rate (nonhealing or recurrence), and secondary outcomes include operative time, wound healing time, and postoperative complications including fecal incontinence. Surgeries and follow-up are conducted at the Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University with predefined exclusions for fistulas secondary to Crohn's disease, malignancy, trauma, radiation, or patients with preexisting incontinence or levator ani injury.

Who should consider this trial

Good fit: Adults with high anal fistula involving more than one-third of the sphincter complex, either new or recurrent, without inflammatory bowel disease, malignancy, prior pelvic radiation, preexisting fecal incontinence, or levator ani injury.

Not a fit: Patients with low fistulas or fistulas caused by Crohn's disease, malignancy, trauma, prior radiation, or those with existing fecal incontinence or levator ani injury are excluded and unlikely to benefit from these procedures in this trial.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If TROPIS proves superior, patients could have fewer recurrences and lower rates of postoperative fecal incontinence while preserving sphincter function.

How similar studies have performed: Coring-out fistulectomy is a traditional sphincter-preserving approach with variable recurrence rates, while several recent case series report promising outcomes for TROPIS but randomized head-to-head evidence is limited.

Eligibility criteria

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

* Patients with high anal fistula ( involving more than 1/3 of the sphincter complex), whether de novo or recurrent

Exclusion Criteria:

* Patients with fistula secondary to malignancy, inflammatory bowel disease, trauma or radiation
* Patients with Low anal fistula
* Patient with preoperative fecal incontinence
* Previous levator ani muscle injury

Where this trial is running

Cairo, Al-Manial Cairo

Study contacts

How to participate

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Visit the official trial page on ClinicalTrials.gov for the most current contact information and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the listed study coordinator or principal investigator to request pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Conditions High Anal FistulaTROPISIntersphincteric SpaceCoring Out FistulectomyHigh anal fistulasSphincter-Preserving Surgery
Last reviewed 2026-06-13 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.