Clinical trial Recruiting at 16 sites Phase 2 Interventional Ages 18 and up

Treosulfan vs Melphalan conditioning before allogeneic transplant in AML/MDS

Official title: Randomized Evaluation of Treosulfan Versus Melphalan Conditioning Followed by PTCy in Patients With AML and MDS Undergoing Allogeneic Transplantation

Run by Technische Universität Dresden · NCT07025824 · Data updated 2026-11-12

In this study, adults with AML or MDS who are getting an allogeneic transplant try two different conditioning regimens (Treosulfan or Melphalan) to see which one works better and is easier to tolerate.

Quick facts

PhasePhase 2
Study typeInterventional
Ages18 Years and up
SexAll
Enrollment220 (estimated)
SponsorTechnische Universität Dresden
Academic / other
Locations17 sites (Aachen and 16 other locations)
StatusRecruiting
StartedJanuary 21, 2026
Main results expectedSeptember 2029
Study endsSeptember 2029
Registry record updatedSeptember 2, 2026
Trial IDNCT07025824 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Adults (≥18 years) with AML or MDS scheduled for allogeneic transplantation and at increased risk of toxicity, with a suitable donor.

Probably not a fit

Patients without increased transplant-related toxicity or who do not respond to conditioning changes may not see a benefit.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

This phase 2 trial compares Treosulfan-based conditioning to Melphalan-based conditioning, both followed by post-transplant cyclophosphamide, in adults with AML or MDS undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. The study will look at survival, remission/relapse, engraftment, and graft-versus-host disease, along with overall tolerability. Eligible patients are adults with AML or MDS who are scheduled for transplant within three weeks and who have increased risk of treatment-related toxicity. Key inclusion criteria include adequate consent, appropriate disease status, and a suitable donor. The trial is sponsored by Technische Universität Dresden with medac GmbH as a collaborator and involves several European transplant centers.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, patients may experience better tolerability and outcomes with Treosulfan conditioning compared to Melphalan.

How similar studies have gone: Previous conditioning comparisons have explored Treosulfan and Melphalan, with some studies suggesting differential toxicity and engraftment profiles; the results here will add targeted data in this setting.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Main Inclusion Criteria:

1. Informed consent signed by the patient capable of giving
2. Patient scheduled for allogeneic transplantation within the next 3 weeks
3. Age ≥ 18 years
4. AML or MDS according to WHO with indication for allogeneic HCT:

   1. AML in first or second complete remission (CR) or complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi/CRh) or morphologic leukemia-free state (MLFS)
   2. MDS according to WHO
5. Increased risk for treatment-related toxicity by myeloablative conditioning according to at least one of the following criteria:

   1. Patients aged ≥ 50 years at transplant and/or
   2. HCT-CI \> 2 and/or
   3. AML or MDS scheduled for 2nd allogeneic HCT from different donor with minimum of 12 months after 1st allogeneic HCT
6. Availability of a suitable donor:

   1. Matched sibling donor (MSD) or
   2. matched unrelated donor (MUD, 10/10 HLA) or
   3. mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD, single allele or antigen mismatch at HLA-A, -B, -C, or -DRB1 and no concurrent -DQB1 mismatch (9/10) shown by confirmatory typing) or
   4. haploidentical family donor
7. Planned GvHD prophylaxis with standard PTCy (with 50mg/kg body weight on days +3 and +4)
8. No history of cardiac disease that preclude allogeneic HCT and absence of active symptoms, otherwise, documented left ventricular ejection fraction

   * 40 %.
9. No need for supplementary oxygen on day of randomization

Main Exclusion Criteria:

1. Patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia with t(15;17)(q22;q12)
2. Patients with graft failure after previous allogeneic HCT
3. Patients with scheduled 2nd allogeneic HCT within 12 months after 1st allogeneic HCT
4. Pretreatment with either melphalan or treosulfan within the last 12 months prior to randomization
5. Planned TBI as part of conditioning
6. Severe organ dysfunction defined by either one of the following criteria:

   1. Serum bilirubin \> 1.5 × ULN (if not considered Gilbert-syndrome) or
   2. ALAT or ASAT \> 5 × ULN
7. Uncontrolled infection at the time of randomization.
8. Active viral hepatitis unless serology demonstrates clearance of infection. Occult or prior hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, defined as negative hepatitis B surface antigen and positive total hepatitis core antibodies, may be included if HBV DNA is undetectable, provided that patients are willing to undergo monthly DNA testing. Patients who have protective titers of hepatitis B surface antibody after vaccination or prior cured hepatitis B are eligible. Patients for hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody are eligible provided PCR if negative for HCV RNA.
9. Pregnant or breastfeeding women

Where it's running

  • Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Medizinische Klinik IV
    Aachen, Germany
    Recruiting
  • Klinikum Augsburg, Medizinische Klinik II
    Augsburg, Germany
    Recruiting
  • Helios Klinikum Berlin Buch, Klinik für Onkologie und Palliativmedizin
    Berlin, Germany
    Recruiting
  • Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH; Klinik für Innere Medizin III
    Chemnitz, Germany
    Recruiting
  • Universitätsklinikum Köln, Klinik I für Innere Medizin
    Cologne, Germany
    Recruiting
  • Medizinische Fakultät der TU Dresden, Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I
    Dresden, Germany
    Recruiting
Show 11 more locations
  • Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Medizinische Klinik II
    Frankfurt am Main, Germany
    Recruiting
  • Universitätsklinikum Greifswald, Klinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin C
    Greifswald, Germany
    Recruiting
  • Universitätsmedizin Halle (Saale), Klinik für Innere Medizin IV
    Halle, Germany
    Recruiting
  • Universitätsklinikum Jena, Klinik für Innere Medizin II
    Jena, Germany
    Recruiting
  • Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Klinik für Innere Medizin II
    Kiel, Germany
    Recruiting
  • Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Klinik und Poliklinik für Hämatologie, Zelltherapie, Hämostaseologie und Infektiologie
    Leipzig, Germany
    Recruiting
  • Universitätsklinikum Münster, Medizinische Klinik A, KMT-Zentrum
    Münster, Germany
    Recruiting
  • Klinikum Nürnberg, Campus Nord, Klinik für Innere Medizin 5
    Nuremberg, Germany
    Recruiting
  • Universitätsklinik Rostock, Klinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin, Abt. für Hämatologie/Onkologie
    Rostock, Germany
    Recruiting
  • Robert-Bosch-Krankenhaus, Hämatologie, Onkologie und Palliativmedizin
    Stuttgart, Germany
    Recruiting
  • Klinikum der Johannes Gutenberg Universität, III. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik
    Mainz, Germany
    Not yet recruiting

Study contacts

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.