Clinical trial Recruiting at 8 sites Phase 3 Interventional Ages 18 to 85 Women only

Treated Umbilical Vein Graft vs Autologous Sling for Women’s Stress Urinary Incontinence

Official title: Treated Umbilical Vein Allograft (UVT) Versus Autologous Fascial Pubovaginal Sling in the Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence

Run by TBF Genie Tissulaire · NCT06678984 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This trial tests whether a treated umbilical vein graft can be as effective as a patient’s own tissue sling for treating stress urinary incontinence in women.

More Stress Urinary Incontinence trials

Quick facts

PhasePhase 3
Study typeInterventional
Ages18 Years to 85 Years
SexWomen only
Enrollment96 (estimated)
SponsorTBF Genie Tissulaire
Industry-sponsored
Locations8 sites (Clermont-Ferrand and 7 other locations)
StatusRecruiting
StartedNovember 6, 2025
Main results expectedMay 1, 2028
Study endsMay 1, 2028
Registry record updatedOctober 6, 2026
Trial IDNCT06678984 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Women aged 18–85 with stress urinary incontinence (or mixed incontinence with a predominant stress component) due to urethral hypermobility or cervico-urethral hypermobility.

Probably not a fit

Patients with BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2, pregnancy or breastfeeding, or other exclusion criteria may not benefit from this therapy.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

In this Phase 3 interventional study, participants are randomly assigned to receive either a treated umbilical vein allograft or an autologous fascial pubovaginal sling for stress urinary incontinence. All patients undergo surgery on day 0 and attend follow-up visits at 3 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months to monitor outcomes and bladder function. The study aims to determine if the vein graft can match the effectiveness of the standard sling while potentially avoiding donor-site complications. Safety and durability of the implanted material are also monitored throughout follow-up.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, patients may have an effective, safer alternative to autologous tissue harvesting for incontinence surgery.

How similar studies have gone: Other trials in related pelvic floor procedures suggest comparable effectiveness between grafts and autologous tissue, but this specific umbilical vein graft approach is novel.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

* Women aged 18 to 85 years.
* Patients with stress urinary incontinence or mixed urinary incontinence with a predominant stress component.
* Patients with stress urinary incontinence due to cervico-urethral hypermobility or urethral hypermobility.
* Patients with urethral hypermobility confirmed by Ulmsten suburethral support maneuver.
* Urinary incontinence demonstrated by one-hour pad test.
* Patients with significant and persistent discomfort despite perineal rehabilitation.
* Patients able to understand the information concerning the study and having voluntarily dated and signed the informed consent form.
* Patients able and willing to comply with the requirements and instructions of the study.
* Patients who are members or the beneficiary of a national health insurance plan.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Pregnant or breastfeeding women or those not using effective contraception.
* Patients with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 35 kg/m2.
* Patients with moderate stress urinary incontinence treated with physiotherapy and pelvic support exercises.
* Patients with voiding disorders or at risk of performing self-catheterization.
* Patients who have already undergone surgical treatment for urinary incontinence.
* Patients unable to perform the pad test or unwilling to perform it at each follow-up visit.
* Patients considered by the principal investigator to be poor candidates for surgical procedures and/or anesthesia due to their physical or mental state.
* Patients with current urinary tract infection, severe anemia, uncontrolled diabetes or other conditions contraindicating surgery.
* Patients with neurogenic bladder.
* Patients with a history of conditions, illnesses or surgical procedures that may confound the results of the urinary incontinence assessment, including but not limited to: pelvic organ prolapse (e.g., cystocele, rectocele), neurological disorders (e.g., multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease), recurrent urinary tract infections, recurrent bladder stones, interstitial cystitis, history of pelvic irradiation (external beam therapy or brachytherapy), current diagnosis of genitourinary malignancy.
* Patients deprived of liberty by a judicial or administrative decision.
* Patients incapable of discernment for rehabilitation, unable to follow up or give consent.

Where it's running

  • Hôpital Estaing, CHU de Clermont-Ferrand
    Clermont-Ferrand, France
    Recruiting
  • Hôpital Michalon, CHU de Grenoble Alpes
    La Tronche, France
    Recruiting
  • Hôtel-Dieu, CHU de Nantes
    Nantes, France
    Recruiting
  • Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris
    Paris, France
    Recruiting
  • Hôpital Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon
    Pierre-Bénite, France
    Recruiting
  • Hôpital Charles-Nicolle, CHU de Rouen
    Rouen, France
    Recruiting
Show 2 more locations
  • Nouvel hôpital civil, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg
    Strasbourg, France
    Recruiting
  • Hôpital Rangueil, CHU de Toulouse
    Toulouse, France
    Recruiting

Study contacts

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.