Clinical trial Recruiting at 1 site Interventional Ages 50 to 80 Men only

Transurethral Thermodilatation vs Prostatic Urethral Lift for BPH in men 50–80

Official title: Transurethral Thermodilatation Versus Prostatic Urethral Lift for Moderate-to-Severe BPH: A Randomised Controlled Non-Inferiority Trial

Run by The University of Hong Kong · NCT07759752 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This study tests whether Prolieve can match UroLift in relieving BPH symptoms in men 50–80 who haven’t had enough relief from medicines.

Quick facts

Study typeInterventional
Ages50 Years to 80 Years
SexMen only
Enrollment150 (estimated)
SponsorThe University of Hong Kong
Academic / other
Drugs / interventionsradiation
Locations1 site (Hong Kong)
StatusRecruiting
StartedAugust 6, 2026
Main results expectedAugust 5, 2029
Study endsNovember 5, 2029
Registry record updatedAugust 24, 2026
Trial IDNCT07759752 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Ideal candidates are men aged 50–80 with moderate-to-severe LUTS from BPH, prostate volume 30–80 g, Qmax 5–12 mL/s, PVR ≤ 250 mL, and who have failed or tolerated medical therapy.

Probably not a fit

Patients with very large or very small prostates, poor bladder function, or those who do not meet the flow and voiding criteria may not benefit.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

This randomized comparison evaluates two minimally invasive procedures for moderate-to-severe BPH with LUTS. Participants stop their BPH medications briefly and undergo either Prolieve thermodilatation or UroLift on the same day, followed by follow-up visits at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months to measure symptom scores, urine flow, and bladder status. The primary aim is to determine non-inferiority of Prolieve to UroLift in improving IPSS at 3 months, with secondary attention to pain and need for injections. The trial is conducted at Queen Mary Hospital in Hong Kong under The University of Hong Kong as lead sponsor.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If Prolieve is non-inferior and better tolerated, patients may experience similar symptom relief with less pain and fewer injections.

How similar studies have gone: Prior studies support the individual use of each procedure, but direct head-to-head non-inferiority evidence for Prolieve versus UroLift is limited.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

Participants must satisfy ALL of the following:

* Male, aged ≥ 50 and ≤ 80 years
* Moderate-to-severe LUTS due to BPH: IPSS total score ≥ 13 at screening
* Peak urinary flow rate (Qmax) ≥ 5 and ≤ 12 mL/s with minimum voided volume ≥ 125 mL on free uroflowmetry. The lower Qmax bound of ≥ 5 mL/s excludes near-complete retention with likely detrusor underactivity, as adopted in the Rezūm pivotal trial
* Prostate volume 30-80 g by transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) or multiparametric MRI, consistent with the L.I.F.T. and Rezūm pivotal study ranges
* Post-void residual (PVR) ≤ 250 mL by bladder ultrasound
* Currently on, or has previously tried, medical therapy for BPH (alpha-blocker and/or 5-alpha-reductase inhibitor) for ≥ 4 weeks with inadequate symptom control, or documented intolerance to medical therapy
* Able to provide written informed consent
* Able and willing to attend all study follow-up visits

Exclusion Criteria:

Participants will be excluded if ANY of the following apply:

* Intravesical prostatic protrusion \> 10 mm on TRUS.
* Presence of metallic pelvic implants, penile prosthesis, femoral metallic implant, cardiac pacemaker, or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.
* Previous transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), HoLEP, or any prior endoscopic prostate surgery.
* Prior pelvic radiation therapy.
* Prostatic urethral length \< 1.2 cm or \> 5.5 cm.
* Confirmed or suspected prostate carcinoma (unresolved elevated PSA without negative biopsy, or any known malignancy).
* Active urinary tract infection at screening.
* Bladder stone, bladder tumour, or suspected bladder malignancy.
* Urethral stricture or bladder neck contracture precluding catheter passage (Foley ≥ 18 Fr).
* Neurogenic bladder or known clinically significant detrusor underactivity.
* History of acute urinary retention.
* Coagulopathy or therapeutic anticoagulation that cannot be bridged perioperatively.
* Renal impairment: eGFR \< 30 mL/min/1.73 m² (Cockcroft-Gault).
* Desire to preserve fertility (due to risk of retrograde ejaculation with either device).
* IPSS QoL bother score \< 3 (patient not sufficiently bothered to warrant procedural intervention).
* Participation in another interventional clinical trial within the preceding 30 days.

Where it's running

  • Queen Mary Hospital
    Hong Kong, Hong Kong
    Recruiting

Study contacts

  • Principal investigator: Shung Lai John Leung, MBBS, FRCSEd, FCSHK, FHKAM — The University of Hong Kong, Hospital Authority
  • Study coordinator: Shung Lai John Leung, MBBS, FRCSEd, FCSHK, FHKAM
  • Email: jslleung@hku.hk
  • Phone: +852 2255 4310

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.