Clinical trial Recruiting at 1 site Interventional Ages 18 and up

Suprapapillary Metal Stent vs. Routine Drainage for Malignant Hilar Biliary Obstruction

Official title: Randomized Clinical Trial of Suprapapillary Drainage With Metal Stent vs. Routine Internal-External Transpapillary Drainage in Patients With Malignant Hilar Biliary Obstruction

Run by Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre · NCT07558304 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This trial tests whether placing a self-expanding metal stent above the papilla works better than the standard transpapillary drainage for patients with cancer-caused bile duct blockage near the liver.

Quick facts

Study typeInterventional
Ages18 Years and up
SexAll
Enrollment84 (estimated)
SponsorHospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre
Academic / other
Drugs / interventionschemotherapy
Locations2 sites (Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul and 1 other locations)
StatusRecruiting
StartedJune 24, 2026
Main results expectedDecember 31, 2028
Study endsDecember 31, 2028
Registry record updatedOctober 1, 2026
Trial IDNCT07558304 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Adults with malignant proximal biliary obstruction and elevated bilirubin who are not candidates for curative surgery or meet criteria for potentially resectable disease requiring optimized drainage.

Probably not a fit

Patients with non-obstructive disease, rapidly progressing illness, or contraindications to biliary drainage may not benefit.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

This interventional study compares two percutaneous biliary drainage approaches in adults with malignant proximal hilar obstruction. It examines whether suprapapillary drainage using a self-expanding metal stent provides safer or more effective bile decompression than the conventional transpapillary internal-external catheter. Patients are adults with unresectable or high-risk disease, elevated bilirubin, and radiographically confirmed obstruction. Outcomes of interest include procedure-related safety, rate of infectious complications, and degree of biliary decompression. The trial addresses a clinical decision point where optimal drainage technique remains uncertain.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, patients may experience fewer infections and better bile flow with suprapapillary stents, potentially improving symptoms and liver function.

How similar studies have gone: Prior reports suggest favorable safety with suprapapillary stents, but direct comparative evidence remains limited and this trial seeks to provide more clarity.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

1. Age \>18 years.
2. Malignant proximal biliary obstruction on imaging (magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography or contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography) with histopathological confirmation or high clinical and radiological suspicion.
3. Total bilirubin \> 3 mg/dL.
4. Patients not candidates for potentially curative surgical resection due to locally advanced disease, metastatic disease, or inadequate clinical condition.
5. Patients with potentially resectable neoplasms, defined as the possibility of achieving complete resection (R0), who meet at least one of the following criteria:

5.1 Estimated future liver remnant \<40%, in whom percutaneous portal vein embolization of the side to be resected will also be indicated after initial drainage.

5.2 Prolonged jaundice with total bilirubin \>10 mg/dL for more than 14 days. 5.3 Malnutrition, defined as ≥10% unintentional weight loss or albumin \<3 g/dL, presumably attributable to cholestasis.

5.4 Indication for neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Tumor with distal extension to the duodenal papilla, precluding suprapapillary drainage.
2. Prior biliary drainage procedure, either percutaneous (PTBD) or endoscopic (ERCP).
3. Acute cholangitis, clinically defined as fever (axillary temperature \>38°C) and leukocytosis (white blood cell count \>10,000/mm³).
4. Uncorrectable coagulopathy.
5. Iodinated contrast allergy not amenable to desensitization.

Where it's running

  • Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre
    Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
    Recruiting
  • Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre
    Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
    Not yet recruiting

Study contacts

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.