Strain Counter Strain and Muscle Energy Technique for non-specific low back pain
Official title: Effects of Strain Counter Strain Versus Muscle Energy Technique on Pain, Range of Motion and Disability in Non-specific Low Back Pain
Run by Riphah International University · NCT07854028 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study tests whether strain-counterstrain and muscle energy technique can help adults with non-specific low back pain.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 20 Years to 40 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 62 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Riphah International University Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Lahore, Punjab Province) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | June 1, 2026 |
| Main results expected | November 1, 2026 |
| Study ends | December 1, 2026 |
| Registry record updated | October 2, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07854028 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults 20–40 years with 3–6 months of non-specific low back pain and at least 3 active lower back MTrPs who meet criteria.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with red flag conditions, prior spinal surgery, or other excluded health conditions may not benefit.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
The trial investigates the effects of two manual therapy approaches, strain-counterstrain and muscle energy technique, on adults aged 20–40 with chronic non-specific low back pain lasting 3–6 months. Participants are assigned to two groups and receive targeted manual therapy aimed at reducing myofascial trigger points and improving muscle function in the lower back. Outcomes likely include pain intensity and disability measures, with exclusion of patients who have red flag conditions or recent spinal surgery. The study is conducted at Riphah Rehabilitation Clinic in Lahore, led by Riphah International University. Results could inform non-surgical options for muscle-related low back pain.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, participants may experience reduced pain and improved functional ability.
How similar studies have gone: Manual therapy approaches for myofascial trigger points have shown some benefits in similar populations, but evidence varies by technique and setting.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Participants should age between 20-40 years. * Both gender were included. * Participants were required to have experienced LBP lasting three to six months. * According to Simons' criteria participants were required to have at least 3 active myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) in their lower back muscles. * 20-40% score on the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), have Numerical Pain Rating Scale \[NPRS\] ≥ 4. Exclusion Criteria: * The patients with red flag conditions; disc prolapse, spinal stenosis, lumbar radiculopathy and spondylosis were excluded. * Patients who had undergone previous surgery within the last six months, psychiatric or mental deficiencies, pregnancy, or lactation. * Participants with conditions, like osteoporosis, kidney and gastrointestinal disorders. * Individuals with a history of spinal surgery or spinal fractures. * Participants with congenital leg length discrepancy
Where it's running
-
Riphah Rehabilitation Clinic
Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Syed Shakil ur Rehman, PhD — Riphah International University
- Study coordinator: Syed Shakil ur Rehman, PhD
- Email: Shakil.urrehman@riphah.edu.pk
- Phone: +92 320 786661
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Telerehabilitation vs. supervised rehabilitation for patellofemoral pain syndrome
This study tests whether remote exercise therapy can work as well as in-person supervised rehab for people with patellofemoral pain.
-
Vestibular Stimulation vs Core Stability Training for Sitting Balance in Hypotonic Cerebral Palsy
This study tests whether vestibular stimulation or core stability training helps improve sitting balance in young children with hypotonic cerebral palsy.
-
Hybrid mobile health and telerehabilitation vs in-person physiotherapy for shoulder pain
This study tests whether a mobile-health program, tele-rehabilitation sessions, or conventional physiotherapy can help adults with Subacromial Pain Syndrome.
-
Telerehabilitation vs clinic-based physiotherapy for children with spastic cerebral palsy
This study tests whether structured telerehabilitation can be as effective as in-clinic physiotherapy for improving movement in children aged 4–12 with spastic cerebral palsy.
-
tDCS plus Action Observation Therapy for leg function in children with diplegic CP
This study tests whether adding active brain stimulation to action observation therapy can improve leg movement in kids with diplegic cerebral palsy better than a sham stimulation with the same therapy.
-
Sensory Integration Therapy vs Conventional Physical Therapy in Children With Mixed Cerebral Palsy
This study tests whether Sensory Integration Therapy helps improve gross motor function more than standard physical therapy in children aged 4–10 with mixed cerebral palsy.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.