Clinical trial Recruiting at 1 site Interventional Ages 18 and up

Spring-loaded syringe versus vitrectomy machine program for removing silicone oil after retinal detachment surgery

Official title: Vitrectomy Machine Versus Spring Loaded Syringe for Active Silicon Oil Extraxtion

Run by Sohag University · NCT07363889 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This test compares a modified spring-loaded syringe with a vitrectomy-machine silicone oil extraction program to see which is faster and safer for people having silicone oil removed after pars plana vitrectomy.

Quick facts

Study typeInterventional
Ages18 Years and up
SexAll
Enrollment200 (estimated)
SponsorSohag University
Academic / other
Locations1 site (Sohag, Sohag Governorate)
StatusRecruiting
StartedJanuary 4, 2022
Main results expectedDecember 30, 2026
Study endsMay 2027
Registry record updatedJanuary 23, 2026
Trial IDNCT07363889 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Ideal candidates are patients with silicone-filled eyes scheduled for silicone oil removal after prior pars plana vitrectomy for retinal detachment who meet the listed inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Probably not a fit

Patients with recurrent retinal detachment, previous scleral buckling, prior glaucoma surgery, bleeding tendencies, or anterior staphyloma were excluded and are unlikely to benefit from this comparison.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

This interventional comparison enrolled 540 eyes from 505 patients who were prepared for silicone oil removal after prior pars plana vitrectomy for retinal detachment. All procedures used 23-gauge pars plana vitrectomy and were classified into two groups: removal using the Optikon vitrectomy device's built-in silicone oil extraction program or removal using a modified spring-loaded syringe. The study measured efficiency (for example extraction time and completeness) and safety (intraoperative and postoperative complications). Findings will indicate whether the simpler syringe technique matches the machine program in performance and safety.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, the spring-loaded syringe technique could offer a simpler, lower-cost, and equally safe option for silicone oil removal after retinal detachment surgery.

How similar studies have gone: Manual syringe techniques and machine-assisted silicone oil extraction have been reported previously, but direct large-scale comparisons of a modified spring-loaded syringe versus a vitrectomy device program are limited.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

* Patients subjected previously to pars plana vitrectomy with silicon oil tamponade.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Recurrent retinal detachment
* Previous scleral buckling
* Previous glaucoma surgery
* Bleeding tendencies
* Anterior staphyloma

Where it's running

  • Sohag Faculty of Medicine
    Sohag, Sohag Governorate, Egypt
    Recruiting

Study contacts

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.