Single- vs Double-Level Radiofrequency Ablation for Chronic Coccydynia
Official title: Comparison of Single- and Double-Level Radiofrequency Ablation for Chronic Coccydynia
Run by Marmara University · NCT07509593 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study tests whether a single-level or double-level radiofrequency ablation around the coccygeal nerves provides better pain relief for adults with chronic tailbone pain who previously improved with a nerve block but later worsened.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 75 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 50 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Marmara University Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Istanbul, PENDİK) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | June 1, 2026 |
| Main results expected | June 2027 |
| Study ends | November 2027 |
| Registry record updated | July 9, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07509593 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults with coccygeal pain persisting >2 months who previously had ≥50% pain relief from a ganglion impar block within the past 6 months and now have pain recurrence.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients who do not respond to prior ganglion impar block or who cannot tolerate or have contraindications to RFA may not benefit.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This prospective randomized study compares two radiofrequency ablation techniques targeting the ganglion impar in people with chronic coccydynia. Participants are adults who had at least 50% pain relief from a prior ganglion impar block but have since experienced recurrence. The trial uses fluoroscopic guidance to perform either a single-level or a double-level lesion and follows participants for up to two months to assess pain, function, and quality of life. Outcomes include pain intensity and functional status measured with validated tools. The study is conducted at Marmara University in Istanbul and aims to determine which technique yields superior clinical benefit.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the more effective RFA approach could offer longer-lasting pain relief and improved function for patients with chronic coccydynia.
How similar studies have gone: Direct comparisons of single- versus double-level ganglion impar RFA are limited; evidence from similar approaches in other pain conditions supports RFA as a useful option, but this study addresses a specific head-to-head comparison in coccydynia.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients with coccygeal pain lasting longer than 2 months * Patients who experienced significant pain relief (≥50% reduction) after a ganglion impar block performed within the last 6 months, but whose pain has subsequently recurred * Patients who provide informed consent to participate in the study Exclusion Criteria: * Acute coccydynia (pain duration less than 2 months) * Patients who did not achieve significant benefit (\<50% pain reduction) from prior ganglion impar block * Patients with severe neurological or psychiatric disorders that impair communication or ability to follow instructions
Where it's running
-
Marmara University Faculty of Medicine
Istanbul, Pendi̇k, Turkey (Türkiye) Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Gaye Boztepe, MD
- Email: gayeboztepe@gmail.com
- Phone: +902166254545
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Alexithymia in people with chronic coccydynia
This study tests whether people with long-lasting tailbone pain also have higher alexithymia and how it relates to pain, mood, life quality, and early trauma.
-
Neuraxial anesthesia and recovery quality after cesarean delivery
This study looks at whether the type of neuraxial anesthesia used for cesarean delivery affects how quickly and well new mothers recover.
-
Subcutaneous Fat, Back Muscles, and Spine Shape in Back Pain Patients
This study tests whether body fat under the skin and features of back muscles and spine joints are linked to lumbar facet joint degeneration in adults with chronic low back pain.
-
Neuropathic Pain Severity in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Its Link to Radiology
This study will test how severe neuropathic pain is in adults with lumbar spinal stenosis and see if it relates to MRI findings and other clinical features.
-
Sarcopenia and Epidural Steroid Injections in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
We’re testing how sarcopenia relates to pain, function, and quality of life after a routine interlaminar epidural steroid injection in people with lumbar spinal stenosis.
-
TFESI for neuropathic pain in lumbosacral radiculopathy
This study tests whether a transforaminal epidural steroid injection relieves neuropathic pain in adults with lumbosacral radiculopathy.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.