Sagittal split plate versus two miniplates for fixing mandibular angle breaks
Official title: New Design Sagittal Split Plate Versus Two Miniplates in the Treatment of Mandibular Angle Fractures (Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial)
Run by Alexandria University · NCT07103590 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This trial will test whether a single sagittal split plate or two conventional miniplates works better to fix recent, uninfected mandibular angle fractures.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 20 Years to 50 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 16 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Alexandria University Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Alexandria) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | July 16, 2025 |
| Main results expected | December 1, 2025 |
| Study ends | December 1, 2025 |
| Registry record updated | August 5, 2025 |
| Trial ID | NCT07103590 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are patients with recent, uninfected mandibular angle fractures that require open reduction and internal fixation and who are medically fit for surgery.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with infection at the fracture line, pathological or old fractures, or those medically unfit for surgery are unlikely to benefit from this comparison.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
Adults with recent, uninfected mandibular angle fractures that require open reduction and internal fixation will receive either a single sagittal split plate or two conventional miniplates. Procedures and follow-up are conducted at the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department of Alexandria University. Outcomes will include fixation stability, healing time, need for postoperative immobilization, and complication rates such as infection or malocclusion. The trial compares these two fixation techniques to see which provides better clinical outcomes and fewer complications.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the preferred plating technique could provide more stable fixation, faster recovery, and fewer postoperative complications for patients with jaw angle fractures.
How similar studies have gone: Previous clinical reports have compared single-plate and dual-plate fixation for mandibular angle fractures with mixed results, often showing comparable outcomes but no clear consensus.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients suffering from recent, uninfected angle mandibular fracture. * Fracture that demands open reduction and internal fixation. Exclusion Criteria: * Medically compromised patients contradicting the operation. * Existence of infection at the fracture line. * Pathological fracture. * An old fracture.
Where it's running
-
Outpatient Clinic of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University
Alexandria, Egypt Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Peter Naeem El Masry, BDS
- Email: peternaderelmasry@gmail.com
- Phone: 0 12 87142534
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Compare submucosal dexamethasone versus methylprednisolone after parasymphysis mandible repair
This research will try to see whether a single submucosal dose of dexamethasone or methylprednisolone better reduces pain, swelling, and jaw stiffness after surgical repair of parasymphysis mandibular fractures in adults aged 18–40.
-
Evaluating the need for antibiotics after mandible fracture surgery
This study is testing if giving antibiotics after surgery for jaw fractures is really needed to help prevent infections in adults.
-
Single vs. double stapling and purse-string techniques after rectal cancer surgery
This trial tests whether using a single-stapling method to join the bowel after rectal cancer surgery results in fewer leaks compared with the double-stapling method.
-
TAVI and PCI vs SAVR and CABG in low- and intermediate-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis and CAD
This observational study compares TAVI plus PCI to SAVR plus CABG for patients who have both severe aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease.
-
Primary anastomosis vs Bishop-Koop for neonatal jejunoileal atresia
This study tests whether primary anastomosis or a Bishop-Koop procedure better supports recovery in newborns with jejunoileal atresia.
-
AI-based psychiatric simulation to reduce stigma and boost readiness in nursing students
A randomized trial will test whether an AI-powered simulation program helps fourth-year nursing students at Alexandria University think more positively about mental illness and feel more prepared to work in psychiatric care.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.