Robotic versus laparoscopic radical surgery for locally advanced stomach and gastroesophageal junction cancer
Official title: A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Clinical Study of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Radical Surgery for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer
Run by Southwest Hospital, China · NCT06791538 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This trial will test whether robotic gastrectomy is as effective as — and safer than — laparoscopic gastrectomy for adults aged 18–74 with locally advanced stomach or gastroesophageal junction cancer.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 75 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 740 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Southwest Hospital, China Academic / other |
| Locations | 2 sites (Chongqing, Chongqing Municipality and 1 other locations) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | February 1, 2025 |
| Main results expected | February 1, 2027 |
| Study ends | February 1, 2028 |
| Registry record updated | June 8, 2025 |
| Trial ID | NCT06791538 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are adults 18–74 with endoscopically confirmed gastric adenocarcinoma staged clinically as cT2-4a, N0-3, M0 who have ECOG 0–1 and ASA I–III and no distant metastasis or prior upper abdominal cancer surgery.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with distant metastases, direct invasion of adjacent organs, prior gastric malignancy surgery, significant comorbidities or poor performance status, or those aged 75 and older are unlikely to benefit from participation.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
Adults with histologically confirmed locally advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (cT2-4a, N0-3, M0) who are fit for surgery are randomly assigned to either robotic or laparoscopic gastrectomy. The trial's co-primary questions are whether 3-year disease-free survival after robotic gastrectomy is non-inferior to laparoscopic gastrectomy and whether perioperative safety is superior with the robotic approach. Participants undergo the assigned surgical procedure and regular follow-up visits including early postoperative checks and longer-term surveillance out to at least three years. The protocol excludes patients with distant metastasis, direct invasion of adjacent organs, prior gastric cancer surgery, or poor preoperative fitness.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, robotic gastrectomy could provide similar long-term cancer control with fewer perioperative complications and faster recovery.
How similar studies have gone: Smaller and observational studies have shown that robotic gastrectomy can match laparoscopic oncologic outcomes and may reduce some perioperative complications, but randomized long-term comparisons are limited.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Age \> 18 years and \< 75 years. 2. Primary gastric lesion histologically confirmed as gastric adenocarcinoma (including papillary adenocarcinoma, tubular adenocarcinoma, mucinous adenocarcinoma, signet ring cell carcinoma, poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma, etc.) via endoscopic biopsy. 3. Preoperative clinical staging as locally advanced gastric cancer (cT2-4a, N0-3, M0) according to the 8th edition of the AJCC TNM staging system. 4. No distant metastasis on preoperative examination, and no direct invasion of the pancreas, spleen, or other adjacent organs. 5. Preoperative ECOG performance status score of 0 or 1. 6. Preoperative ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) physical status score of I-III. 7. Consent to participate in the study and signing of the informed consent form. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Previous history of gastric malignancy surgery, including submucosal resection and/or endoscopic mucosal resection. 2. History of upper abdominal surgery (excluding laparoscopic cholecystectomy). 3. Preoperative imaging shows regional lymph nodes with confluent enlargement (maximum diameter ≥3cm). 4. Patient underwent emergency surgery due to gastric tumor bleeding or perforation. 5. History of other malignancies, or presence of other malignant tumors detected during preoperative examination. 6. Patient has a history of malignant tumor, or other malignant tumors were found during preoperative examination 7. ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) score \>3. 8. Severe psychiatric disorders. 9. History of unstable angina or myocardial infarction within the past 6 months. 10. History of cerebral infarction or cerebral hemorrhage within the past 6 months. 11. Severe pulmonary disease with FEV1 \< 50%. 12. Systemic corticosteroid therapy within 1 month prior to the study. 13. Need for concurrent surgery for other diseases. 14. Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
Where it's running
-
The Southwest hospital of AMU
Chongqing, Chongqing Municipality, China Recruiting -
The Southwest hospital of AMU
Chongqing, Chongqing Municipality, China Not yet recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Yan Shi
- Email: shiyandoctor@sina.com
- Phone: 13752909448
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Exploring how psychological stress affects treatment outcomes in gastric cancer
This study is trying to see how psychological stress affects the treatment results for people with gastric cancer who have had surgery and other therapies.
-
Treatment of locally advanced gastric cancer with Tislelizumab and chemotherapy
This study is testing if a new treatment combining Tislelizumab and chemotherapy can help people with locally advanced gastric cancer live longer and have fewer problems after treatment.
-
Predicting treatment response in gastric cancer using immune markers
This study is trying to find out if certain immune markers in the blood can help doctors predict how well advanced gastric cancer patients will respond to chemotherapy and immunotherapy.
-
Oral Paclitaxel Plus Fruquintinib as Second-Line Treatment in Advanced Gastric/GEJ Cancer
This trial tests whether taking an oral paclitaxel solution together with fruquintinib, chosen by the investigator, can help adults with advanced or metastatic stomach or gastroesophageal junction cancer after first-line therapy.
-
Sintilimab plus SOX chemotherapy versus SOX alone after surgery for stomach or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma
This trial will test whether adding sintilimab to SOX chemotherapy after surgery helps people with stage IIIC or dMMR/MSI‑H stage IIIA/IIIB stomach or gastroesophageal junction cancer stay disease‑free longer.
-
Neoadjuvant cadonilimab plus perioperative SOX for diffuse or mixed locally advanced stomach/GEJ cancer
This will test whether adding cadonilimab to perioperative SOX chemotherapy helps people with diffuse or mixed locally advanced stomach or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.