Restrictive versus liberal IV fluids during elective cesarean with spinal anesthesia
Official title: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Restrictive and Liberal Intraoperative Fluid Strategies on Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting and Gastrointestinal Recovery After Elective Cesarean Section Under Spinal Anesthesia
Run by Nigde Omer Halisdemir University · NCT07440667 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This trial will test whether giving less versus more IV fluids during spinal anesthesia reduces nausea and speeds bowel recovery for women having an elective cesarean.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 45 Years |
| Sex | Women only |
| Enrollment | 160 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Nigde Omer Halisdemir University Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Niğde, Merkez) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | March 4, 2026 |
| Main results expected | January 30, 2027 |
| Study ends | January 30, 2027 |
| Registry record updated | March 10, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07440667 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Women aged 18–45 with ASA physical status II scheduled for elective cesarean under spinal anesthesia who can give informed consent are the intended participants.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with preeclampsia/eclampsia, significant cardiac, renal, or hepatic failure, coagulopathy, emergency cesarean, or those converted to general anesthesia are excluded and unlikely to benefit from the study interventions.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This is a prospective, single-center, randomized, parallel-group trial comparing restrictive (≤3 mL/kg/h) and liberal (>3 mL/kg/h) intraoperative crystalloid strategies in women undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. Eligible patients aged 18–45 with ASA II will be randomized 1:1 at Niğde Ömer Halisdemir University Hospital. The primary outcome is the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting within 24 hours, and secondary outcomes include postdural puncture headache, time to first flatus, hypotension frequency, and vasopressor requirements. Intraoperative hemodynamics, fluid volumes, and postoperative recovery metrics will be recorded to compare maternal outcomes between the two fluid regimens.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the selected fluid strategy could reduce nausea and speed gastrointestinal recovery after cesarean, improving comfort and informing optimal fluid management.
How similar studies have gone: Previous studies comparing restrictive and liberal intraoperative fluids in obstetric and non-obstetric surgery have shown mixed results, so the optimal approach remains unresolved.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Female patients aged 18-45 years * ASA physical status II * Scheduled for elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia * Provision of written informed consent Exclusion Criteria: * Emergency cesarean section * Preeclampsia or eclampsia * Known cardiac failure * Known renal failure * Known hepatic failure * Coagulopathy * Contraindication to spinal anesthesia * Conversion to general anesthesia * Major technical complications during spinal anesthesia * Refusal to participate
Where it's running
-
Niğde Ömer Halisdemir University Hospital
Niğde, Merkez, Turkey (Türkiye) Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Pınar Erdoğan, Assoc Prof — Niğde Ömer Halisdemir University Hospital
- Study coordinator: Pınar Erdoğan, Assoc. Prof.
- Email: pinar.erdogan@ohu.edu.tr
- Phone: +905233646954
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Oral Gabapentin vs IV Neostigmine/Atropine vs Both for Preventing PDPH
This study tests whether taking gabapentin by mouth, getting neostigmine with atropine by IV, or using both can help prevent postdural puncture headache after spinal anesthesia in pregnant patients.
-
Effects of massage and exercises on cesarean scar and recovery
This study tests whether direct scar massage or indirect massage plus exercise helps people recover after a cesarean birth and reduces scar-related pain.
-
Reflexology and hand massage after cesarean section
This study tests whether reflexology hand massage or stroking hand massage can reduce anxiety and increase satisfaction, and how they affect heart/blood pressure after cesarean delivery.
-
Opioid-Free Anesthesia in FESS with ERAS
This study tries a opioid-free anesthesia approach during functional endoscopic sinus surgery to see if pain, nausea, and recovery are improved for adults undergoing this procedure.
-
Health education to see if primigravida women choose vaginal delivery more often
A health education program is being tested to see if it helps first-time pregnant women in choosing vaginal delivery over unnecessary cesareans.
-
Enhanced Recovery Adherence and Recovery Quality After Cesarean Delivery
This study tests whether following enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery protocols is linked with better recovery quality in women having a planned cesarean with spinal anesthesia.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.