Resection and reconstruction versus internal metal fixation for metastatic disease of the upper femur
Official title: Proximal FEmur Reconstruction or Internal Fixation fOR Metastases (PERFORM) Randomized Controlled Trial
Run by McMaster University · NCT06863129 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This trial tests whether removing and replacing the affected part of the upper thigh bone works better than stabilizing it with metal hardware for people with metastatic cancer in the proximal femur.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 334 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | McMaster University Academic / other |
| Locations | 13 sites (Aurora, Colorado and 12 other locations) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | February 1, 2025 |
| Main results expected | June 1, 2029 |
| Study ends | June 1, 2030 |
| Registry record updated | July 8, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT06863129 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are adults with metastatic lesions in the proximal femur (not isolated to the femoral neck or involving the femoral head), who are fit for surgery with an expected survival of at least six months and who have agreed with their surgeon to operative management.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with lesions limited to the femoral neck or involving the femoral head, those judged high risk for surgery, or those with life expectancy under six months are unlikely to qualify for or benefit from the approaches tested.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
PERFORM is a randomized, multicenter trial that assigns patients with metastatic lesions of the proximal femur to either internal fixation with nails/plates or to resection and endoprosthetic reconstruction. Eligible patients must meet specific surgical fitness and life-expectancy criteria and are followed at regular intervals after surgery (2 weeks, 6 weeks, 4 months, 6 months, and 9 months). The trial measures patient-important outcomes including need for reoperation, mechanical failure of hardware, local disease control, mobility, and quality of life. By comparing these two common surgical strategies, the study seeks to identify which approach best reduces complications and preserves function for patients likely to live months to years with metastatic bone disease.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, it could lower the risk of hardware failure and repeat surgeries and improve mobility and quality of life for patients with proximal femur metastases.
How similar studies have gone: Retrospective and cohort studies suggest reconstruction may reduce reoperation compared with fixation, but randomized evidence is limited, making this a relatively novel randomized comparison.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Life expectancy of at least 6 months * Lesions in the proximal femur (femoral neck, intertrochanteric region, subtrochanteric region, and combinations thereof) * Low or intermediate risk for perioperative morbidity and/or mortality * No more than 75% and no less than 25% bone loss * Mutual (patient and physician) decision to perform surgical management of an impending or realized pathologic fracture due to MBD of the proximal has been made. Exclusion Criteria: * Lesions isolated to the femoral neck * Lesion with any femoral head involvement * High risk for perioperative morbidity and/or mortality * Multidisciplinary decision that resection of the entire lesion would be indicated
Where it's running
-
University of Colorado Hospital
Aurora, Colorado, United States Recruiting -
Parkview Packnett Family Cancer Institute
Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States Recruiting -
University of Cincinnati Medical Center
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States Recruiting -
Oregon Health and Science University Hospital
Portland, Oregon, United States Recruiting -
Medical University Graz
Graz, Austria Recruiting -
Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil Recruiting
Show 7 more locations
-
University of Maryland Medical Center
Baltimore, Maryland, United States Active not recruiting -
Albany Medical Center
Albany, New York, United States Active not recruiting -
Good Samaritan Regional Medical Center
Corvallis, Oregon, United States Withdrawn -
Foothills Medical Centre
Calgary, Alberta, Canada Not yet recruiting -
Mount Sinai Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, Canada Active not recruiting -
Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont
Montreal, Quebec, Canada Withdrawn -
McGill University Health Centre
Montreal, Quebec, Canada Active not recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Michelle Ghert, MD — McMaster University
- Study coordinator: Olivia Virag, MA
- Email: viragoe@mcmaster.ca
- Phone: 905- 521-2100
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Remote smartwatch monitoring of walking and daily function in bone cancer
This study tests whether a smartwatch can track walking stability and daily activities to spot changes during treatment for people with osteosarcoma or metastatic bone disease.
-
Sex Differences in BDNF Response to a Maximal Exercise Test
This study tests whether men and women have different levels of BDNF in the blood after a maximal exercise test.
-
Weight-loss drugs tirzepatide vs. semaglutide in adults with obesity
This trial tests whether 12 weeks of tirzepatide or semaglutide have different effects on energy balance in adults with obesity but no diabetes.
-
Plan B and heart health: a look at how a single dose affects veins and arteries in young women
This study tests whether a single dose of Plan B® affects the blood vessels and heart health of healthy premenopausal women aged 18-35, by comparing it to a placebo in a short-term, double-blind setup.
-
Brain wave‑guided noninvasive brain stimulation to help working memory in dementia
This study tests whether synchronizing brain waves with EEG‑guided transcranial magnetic stimulation can improve working memory in people with dementia or Alzheimer's disease.
-
Isometric Handgrip Exercise for Older Adults with High Blood Pressure: A Feasibility Pilot
This study tests whether a short, supervised handgrip program can be done safely in community settings by older adults with hypertension to see if it helps lower blood pressure and may boost cognitive function.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.