Progressive muscle relaxation versus muscle energy technique for chronic neck pain in heavy computer users
Official title: Progressive Muscle Relaxation Vs Muscle Energy Technique on Nonspecific Neck Pain in Prolonged Computer Users. A Randomized Controlled Trial
Run by IQRA University · NCT06918535 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This test will compare progressive muscle relaxation and muscle energy technique to see which better reduces chronic neck pain in people who use computers six or more hours a day.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 20 Years to 45 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 60 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | IQRA University Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Karachi, Sindh) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | April 22, 2025 |
| Main results expected | April 15, 2026 |
| Study ends | April 30, 2026 |
| Registry record updated | January 8, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT06918535 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults 20–45 who use a computer at least six hours per day, have nonspecific chronic neck pain with hypertonic upper trapezius or SCM, at least one latent trigger point, and a pain score of ≥2 on the NRS are ideal candidates.
✕Probably not a fit
People with specific cervical conditions (disc prolapse, recent cervical trauma, fractures, whiplash, cervicogenic headache) or neurological signs of nerve root compression, and those who use computers less than six hours daily, are unlikely to benefit from these interventions.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This is a randomized controlled comparison of progressive muscle relaxation technique (PMRT) versus muscle energy technique (MET) delivered to desk-based computer users with nonspecific chronic neck pain. Sixty participants aged 20–45 with hypertonicity of the upper trapezius and SCM and at least one latent trigger point will be randomized to one of the two active interventions. Treatments and assessments are delivered in an outpatient/workplace-linked setting at the Sindh Institute of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, with one blinded investigator performing screening, baseline, and post-treatment assessments. Outcomes will focus on changes in pain intensity and local muscle tension around identified trigger points.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the better technique could reduce neck pain and muscle tightness and make prolonged computer work more comfortable.
How similar studies have gone: Prior small trials of PMRT and MET have reported mixed but sometimes favorable results for neck and musculoskeletal pain, though head-to-head comparisons in prolonged computer users are limited.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Persons using computer more than 6 hours throughout the day, intermittently both genders. * Age between 20-45. * Hypertonicity of trapezius muscle and SCM muscle. Specifically, those workers have neck pain and stiffness (including trouble tilting or turning head). Patients who reported small tightening and spasm at the posterior aspect of their neck are included, also associated with more diffuse neck pain patterns that included the following: headache, (upper back, neck and shoulder pain) numbness/ tingling in the hand/arm. * Pain intensity of 2 on the NRS and presence of at least one latent trigger point in a taut band in the neck region. Exclusion Criteria: * Recent trauma to the cervical region * Exclusion criteria based on with any serious pathology such as specific neck pain due to disc prolapsed, tumor of cervical spine, whiplash injury, cervical fractures, Cervicogenic headache, and any neurological signs consistent with nerve root compression
Where it's running
-
Sindh Institute of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Syeda Waniya Riaz, PhD (scholar), MSAPT, DPT — IQRA University
- Study coordinator: Syeda Waniya Riaz, PhD (scholar), MSAPT, DPT
- Email: waniya.riaz@iqra.edu.pk
- Phone: +923352783584
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Comparing aerobic, strengthening, and posture/stretching exercises for people with chronic neck pain
This project will test whether three different exercise programs— aerobic, strengthening, or posture and stretching—can reduce pain and disability and improve thinking, brain imaging, and blood markers in adults with chronic neck pain.
-
Shoulder–pelvis PNF exercises versus suboccipital release for chronic neck pain with tight hamstrings
This project will test whether a shoulder-to-pelvis PNF exercise program helps 18–40-year-olds with chronic neck pain and tight hamstrings more than suboccipital muscle release combined with hamstring stretching.
-
Upper extremity function in neck pain: comparing people with chronic neck pain to healthy individuals
We will test how chronic non-specific neck pain affects upper body function and quality of life by comparing people with neck pain to healthy adults.
-
Effects of Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization vs Post Facilitation Stretch in Chronic Neck Pain
This trial compares two manual therapy techniques, IASTM and Post Facilitation Stretch, to see which better reduces neck pain and improves movement and function in adults with chronic neck pain.
-
Kinesiology Taping vs Self-Mobilization for Neck Pain from Prolonged Device Use
This study tests whether applying kinesiology tape or doing self-mobilization helps adults with neck pain who spend many hours on electronic devices.
-
Biofeedback and Mulligan neck therapy for mechanical neck pain in women
This study tests whether adding biofeedback-guided deep cervical flexor training to Mulligan mobilization and standard neck exercises helps reduce pain and improve movement in women aged 18–45 with mechanical neck pain.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.