Priming theta burst stimulation intensity for improving arm recovery after stroke
Official title: Optimizing the Intensity of Priming Theta Burst Stimulation to Improve Hemiparetic Upper Limb Motor Functions After Stroke: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Run by The Hong Kong Polytechnic University · NCT06509789 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This trial will test whether low‑intensity priming intermittent theta burst stimulation helps people with chronic stroke regain better arm movement compared with conventional priming, nonpriming, or sham stimulation.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 80 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 100 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Hong Kong, Hong Kong) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | July 2, 2025 |
| Main results expected | December 31, 2026 |
| Study ends | September 30, 2027 |
| Registry record updated | August 24, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT06509789 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults aged 18–80 with unilateral upper‑limb motor dysfunction from ischemic stroke at least 6 months prior, residual function at FTHUE levels 2–6, able to undergo MRI and TMS, and able to provide informed consent are ideal candidates.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with contraindications to TMS or MRI, recent (<6 months) or bilateral strokes, major comorbid neurological disease, or those with very minimal or no residual arm movement are unlikely to receive benefit from this protocol.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This randomized controlled trial will enroll 108 adults with chronic unilateral ischemic stroke and moderate-to-severe upper‑limb impairment. Participants are randomly assigned to one of four groups (low‑intensity priming iTBS, conventional‑intensity priming iTBS, nonpriming iTBS, or double‑sham) and receive three stimulation sessions per week for four weeks followed by 60 minutes of standardized motor training each session. Outcomes include clinical upper‑limb motor tests and measures of cortical excitation/inhibition using TMS and EEG, with MRI used to confirm lesion location. The study compares a 55% RMT priming protocol plus 70% RMT iTBS against other priming intensities and sham to see which produces the best motor and neurophysiologic changes.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the approach could offer a more effective noninvasive stimulation protocol to speed and enhance recovery of arm movement after chronic stroke.
How similar studies have gone: Previous small studies of iTBS and priming paradigms have shown mixed but promising effects on cortical excitability and motor recovery, while low‑intensity priming specifically remains relatively novel and less tested in large randomized trials.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria 1. Unilateral upper limb motor dysfunction caused by ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, with stroke onset≥6 months. Diagnosis will be verified using discharge summary and radiological reports issued by Hospital Authority. Qualifying participants will undergo structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at the University Research Facility in Behavioral and Systems Neuroscience (UBSN) at PolyU to further confirm their lesion location in the period of experimental participation. 2. Age between 18 and 80 years. 3. Residual upper limb functions between levels 2-7 in the FTHUE, indicating moderately-to-severely impaired upper limb motor functions. 4. Capable of providing informed written consent. Exclusion Criteria Patients who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded: 1. any contraindications to TMS (screened by the safety checklist by Rossi(33)) and/or MRI (screened by the MRI safety checklist offered by UBSN \[see supplement\]). 2. Diagnosed with any concomitant neurological disease other than stroke. 3. signs of cognitive impairment, with a Montreal cognitive assessment score\<21/22 out of 30 (34). 4. Severe spasticity in the hemiparetic upper limb muscles, with a Modified Ashworth score \> 2 (35).
Where it's running
-
Jack Jiaqi Zhang
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong Recruiting
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Deep phenotyping to explore recovery in young adults after stroke
This project will test whether a detailed health and sample-collection approach (deep phenotyping) is practical and acceptable for people aged 18–55 who have had a stroke.
-
Stem cell therapy for chronic stroke recovery
This study is testing whether using a patient's own stem cells can help people with long-term stroke recovery feel better and improve their daily functioning.
-
AI-based tools to help diagnose, treat and predict stroke outcomes across multiple hospitals
This study tests AI-powered tools on real-world stroke patients to see if they can improve pre-hospital triage, diagnosis, and outcome prediction while data stay securely within each hospital.
-
Web-based therapy using action observation and mirror therapy for arm weakness after stroke
This trial tests whether a mobile telerehabilitation app delivering action observation therapy (AOT) alone or combined AOT with mirror therapy (AOT-MT) can improve upper limb function in people with subacute stroke.
-
Remote Ischaemic Conditioning for Fatigue After Stroke 2
Aat least 12 weeks after stroke, adults with post-stroke fatigue will try a simple hand-arm cuff treatment at home to see if it helps reduce fatigue.
-
Dual-task balance training plus computer-based cognitive training after stroke
In adults who recently had a stroke, the study tests whether adding computerized cognitive exercises to balance training improves balance and other recovery outcomes.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.