Passive robots and electrical stimulation to help arm recovery after stroke
Official title: Passive Robots for Stroke Rehabilitation
Run by University of Michigan · NCT07218276 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study tests whether combining a low-cost passive robotic device (SepaRRo) with noninvasive neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NeuRRoFES) can help stroke survivors improve upper‑limb movement during long-term, home‑friendly training.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 75 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 4 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | University of Michigan Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Ann Arbor, Michigan) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | November 5, 2025 |
| Main results expected | October 1, 2027 |
| Study ends | October 1, 2027 |
| Registry record updated | November 10, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07218276 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults 18–75 with a single ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, preserved sensation/proprioception and some usable movement in the affected arm who can participate in in‑person visits are ideal candidates.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with bilateral stroke, complete arm paralysis, severe spasticity or contractures, major cognitive impairment, uncontrolled medical conditions, or contraindications to neuromodulation are unlikely to benefit or be eligible.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
Many stroke survivors have lasting upper‑extremity weaknesses but high‑end robotic rehab is often too expensive or bulky for routine or home use. This study uses a table‑top semi‑passive device called SepaRRo together with a custom controller that triggers neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NeuRRoFES) during functional tasks. Participants will undergo long‑term training with these tools while researchers measure technical feasibility (adherence, time on task, retention, ability to perform tasks, and user feedback) and clinical signals of change (biomechanical, neurophysiological, and functional measures). The goal is to determine whether this affordable, compliant system could be practical for wider clinical or home rehabilitation.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the approach could provide a lower‑cost, home‑capable option to improve arm movement and daily function for many stroke survivors.
How similar studies have gone: Powered robotic therapy and functional electrical stimulation have shown benefits for upper‑limb recovery after stroke, but combining low‑cost, non‑motorized passive devices with triggered stimulation is relatively novel and less well tested.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Age 18 to 75 years; * Ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke confirmed by CT, MRI, or clinical criteria; * No major deficits of sensation or proprioception; Exclusion Criteria: * Bilateral stroke * Unable to think clearly and remember (Mini-Mental State Exam score \< 22 and miniMOCA \< 8); * Uncontrolled Diabetes or Hypertension; * Severe limitations of joint range of motion that will lead to inability of testing * Severe spasticity and joint contractures that will lead to inability of testing * Complete paresis with no possible movements * Severe aphasia * Any other medical condition that will significantly impact the study results * Unable to obtain reliable motor evoked potentials * Are pregnant or are actively trying to conceive * Have a recent history of repeated fainting spells or syncope. * Have a recent history of seizure (epilepsy) while on anti-seizure medication * Have a recent history of skull fracture/head injury * Have metal implants in the skull * Have cardiac pacemakers
Where it's running
-
University of Michigan - NeuRRo Lab
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Chandramouli Krishnan, PT, PhD — University of Michigan
- Study coordinator: Chandramouli Krishnan, PT, PhD
- Email: mouli@umich.edu
- Phone: 7349364031
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Deep phenotyping to explore recovery in young adults after stroke
This project will test whether a detailed health and sample-collection approach (deep phenotyping) is practical and acceptable for people aged 18–55 who have had a stroke.
-
Stem cell therapy for chronic stroke recovery
This study is testing whether using a patient's own stem cells can help people with long-term stroke recovery feel better and improve their daily functioning.
-
AI-based tools to help diagnose, treat and predict stroke outcomes across multiple hospitals
This study tests AI-powered tools on real-world stroke patients to see if they can improve pre-hospital triage, diagnosis, and outcome prediction while data stay securely within each hospital.
-
Web-based therapy using action observation and mirror therapy for arm weakness after stroke
This trial tests whether a mobile telerehabilitation app delivering action observation therapy (AOT) alone or combined AOT with mirror therapy (AOT-MT) can improve upper limb function in people with subacute stroke.
-
Remote Ischaemic Conditioning for Fatigue After Stroke 2
Aat least 12 weeks after stroke, adults with post-stroke fatigue will try a simple hand-arm cuff treatment at home to see if it helps reduce fatigue.
-
Dual-task balance training plus computer-based cognitive training after stroke
In adults who recently had a stroke, the study tests whether adding computerized cognitive exercises to balance training improves balance and other recovery outcomes.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.