Oral tacrolimus versus dexamethasone micro‑pulse for rapidly progressing pediatric vitiligo
Official title: Oral Tacrolimus Capsule Versus Dexamethasone Micro-pulse Therapy for the Treatment of Rapidly Progressing Vitiligo in Children: A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Study
Run by Xijing Hospital · NCT06900777 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This trial tests whether daily oral tacrolimus or weekend dexamethasone pulses better control rapidly spreading vitiligo in children aged 4–12.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 4 Years to 12 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 90 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Xijing Hospital Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Xi'an, Shaanxi) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | April 1, 2025 |
| Main results expected | April 1, 2026 |
| Study ends | April 1, 2026 |
| Registry record updated | June 19, 2025 |
| Trial ID | NCT06900777 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Children aged 4–12 years with rapidly progressive non‑segmental vitiligo (VIDA score ≥4) affecting 1–50% body surface area whose guardians can provide written informed consent.
✕Probably not a fit
Children with stable‑phase, segmental, mucosal, generalized, or otherwise excluded forms of vitiligo, or those with severe hepatic/renal dysfunction, recent systemic immunosuppression, obesity, or other disqualifying comorbidities are unlikely to be eligible or to benefit from participation.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This is a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial enrolling 90 children with rapidly progressive non‑segmental vitiligo who are randomized 1:1 to oral tacrolimus or dexamethasone micro‑pulse therapy. The tacrolimus group receives weight‑based daily dosing divided twice daily, while the dexamethasone group receives weekend pulse dosing; both are followed for 24 weeks with visits at weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24. The primary outcome is the proportion achieving at least 50% improvement in VASI (VASI‑50) at 24 weeks, and secondary outcomes include higher VASI response thresholds, investigator global assessment, and safety monitored by blood tests and adverse event reporting. Data are analyzed by intention‑to‑treat with chi‑square testing for between‑group comparisons.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this could offer a treatment that better halts progression and improves repigmentation with a preferable safety profile for children with rapidly spreading vitiligo.
How similar studies have gone: Corticosteroid pulse regimens have been used to halt pediatric vitiligo progression, while oral tacrolimus for vitiligo is relatively novel and lacks robust pediatric randomized evidence.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Children aged 4-12 years diagnosed with rapidly progressive non-segmental vitiligo (VIDA score ≥4, indicating disease progression within the past 6 weeks). Total body surface area (BSA) affected by vitiligo between 1% and 50%. Guardians provide written informed consent for the child's participation. Exclusion Criteria: * Stable-phase childhood vitiligo. Segmental, mucosal, undetermined, or generalized vitiligo. Systemic immunosuppressive therapy within the past 4 weeks. Known hypersensitivity to tacrolimus, other macrolide drugs, or study drug excipients. Comorbidities precluding oral tacrolimus use (e.g., severe hepatic/renal dysfunction). Obesity or systemic diseases (e.g., tuberculosis, acute/chronic infections, hypertension, congenital cardiovascular disease). Any condition deemed by investigators to increase participant risk or interfere with trial execution.
Where it's running
-
Xijing Hospital
Xi'an, Shaanxi, China Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Zhe Jian, Associate Professor — First Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University
- Study coordinator: Zhe Jian, Associate Professor
- Email: 13571826086@163.com
- Phone: +862984775406
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
crisaborole 2% versus tacrolimus 0.1% with light therapy for facial vitiligo
This study tests whether applying crisaborole 2% ointment can improve stable facial vitiligo in children and adults and whether it is as safe and effective as tacrolimus 0.1% when combined with light therapy.
-
Imaging vitiligo lesions with polarized, sub-ultraviolet, and ultraviolet dermoscopy
This study tests whether advanced light-based skin imaging can reveal details of vitiligo spots in adults more clearly than standard polarized dermoscopy.
-
MH004 Ointment in non-segmental vitiligo: a phase 3 trial
A 12-month randomized trial tests MH004 ointment to see if it helps facial vitiligo more than a placebo in people aged 12 to 75.
-
NSV: Vitiligo Drug Safety and Effectiveness Registry for Adults and Teens
This registry tracks adults and teens with nonsegmental vitiligo to see how usual treatments work and how safe they are over time in real-world dermatology care.
-
D-2570 in Non-Segmental Vitiligo (Phase 2)
This study tests whether D-2570 can improve skin discoloration in adults with non-segmental vitiligo compared with a placebo.
-
FT536 injection for recurrent WHO Grade 4 astrocytoma
This will try a single intratumoral dose of FT536, an off-the-shelf engineered NK‑cell therapy, in adults undergoing repeat surgery for recurrent Grade 4 astrocytoma.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.