Obstacle Course Training vs Neuromotor Task Training for kids with Developmental Coordination Disorder
Official title: Comparison of Obstacle Course Training and Neuromotor Task Training on Motor Planning and Functional Mobility in Children With Developmental Coordination Disorder
Run by Riphah International University · NCT07575178 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This trial tests whether Obstacle Course Training or Neuromotor Task Training helps 7- to 10-year-olds with DCD improve motor planning and daily movement.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 7 Years to 10 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 28 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Riphah International University Academic / other |
| Locations | 2 sites (Lahore, Punjab Province and 1 other locations) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | January 1, 2026 |
| Main results expected | August 1, 2026 |
| Study ends | August 10, 2026 |
| Registry record updated | August 12, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07575178 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Children aged 7–10 years diagnosed with DCD who meet the study’s cognitive and motor criteria and can participate in two weekly sessions.
✕Probably not a fit
Children with DCD who cannot tolerate the training sessions or have conditions that interfere with participation may not benefit.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This randomized study compares two pediatric motor interventions for children with Developmental Coordination Disorder. Over 9 weeks, participants receive either Obstacle Course Training or Neuromotor Task Training, with two sessions per week, to see which approach better improves motor planning and functional mobility. Outcomes are measured using standardized motor performance assessments. The study is conducted at pediatric rehabilitation centers in Lahore, Pakistan, and aims to guide more effective, task-specific therapies for DCD in school-aged children.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the more effective intervention could lead to better daily motor skills and participation in activities for children with DCD.
How similar studies have gone: Prior neuromotor and task-specific training approaches have shown promise in improving motor skills in DCD, though direct head-to-head trials are limited.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * • Diagnosis of DCD based on DSM4/5 criteria. * Children aged 7-10. * Gender male and female. * Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score \>24 . * Cognitive development appropriate for chronological age. * Raven Intelligence Test Scale (IQ \> 75) . * Developmental Coordination Questionnaire ≤48 points: likely DCD (≤ 10th percentile). * BOT-2 score ≤ 40. Exclusion Criteria: * History of surgery and lower limb injuries over the past 12 months. * Use of assistive devices to balance and walk. * Severe ADHD, Autism Spectrum Disorder (if it significantly interferes with participation), or major psychiatric disorders. * Taking neuroleptics or any other medications that significantly alter muscle tone, coordination, or attention.
Where it's running
-
University Of Lahore Teaching Hospital ULTH
Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan Recruiting -
Riphah Rehabilitation Center, Riphah International University
Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan Not yet recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Arshmaan Mahmood, MS-PPT — Riphah International University
- Study coordinator: Imran Amjad Phd, MS
- Email: imran.amjad@riphah.edu.pk
- Phone: 03324390125
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
PhiCube: a portable bilateral robot to help children improve arm movement
This study will try a portable bilateral robot called PhiCube to improve upper-arm movement in children aged 4–18 with congenital or acquired neuromotor disorders and in a small group with developmental coordination disorder.
-
Telerehabilitation vs. supervised rehabilitation for patellofemoral pain syndrome
This study tests whether remote exercise therapy can work as well as in-person supervised rehab for people with patellofemoral pain.
-
Vestibular Stimulation vs Core Stability Training for Sitting Balance in Hypotonic Cerebral Palsy
This study tests whether vestibular stimulation or core stability training helps improve sitting balance in young children with hypotonic cerebral palsy.
-
Hybrid mobile health and telerehabilitation vs in-person physiotherapy for shoulder pain
This study tests whether a mobile-health program, tele-rehabilitation sessions, or conventional physiotherapy can help adults with Subacromial Pain Syndrome.
-
Telerehabilitation vs clinic-based physiotherapy for children with spastic cerebral palsy
This study tests whether structured telerehabilitation can be as effective as in-clinic physiotherapy for improving movement in children aged 4–12 with spastic cerebral palsy.
-
tDCS plus Action Observation Therapy for leg function in children with diplegic CP
This study tests whether adding active brain stimulation to action observation therapy can improve leg movement in kids with diplegic cerebral palsy better than a sham stimulation with the same therapy.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.