Observing treatment outcomes for vaginal prolapse in women

Is this trial a fit for you?

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

This study investigates the effectiveness of different treatments for vaginal prolapse in adult women, specifically comparing surgical repair and vaginal pessary use. Participants will complete a series of questionnaires before treatment and at various intervals post-treatment to assess symptom evolution and treatment outcomes. The study aims to identify any issues related to pessary use and document adverse effects associated with both treatment methods. The findings will help improve understanding of treatment efficacy and patient experiences.

Why it matters

Who can join: the full rules

Inclusion Criteria:

* women with a symptomatic vaginal prolapse
* older than 18 years

Exclusion Criteria:

* under 18 years old
* undergone a previous treatment with a pessary or surgery for vaginal prolapse
* contra-indications for surgery or pessary use
* active or passive child wish
* not able to understand the Dutch language
* not able to give a written consent

Where it's running

• Ghent University Hospital
  Ghent, Belgium Recruiting

Study contacts

• Principal investigator: Tjalina Hamerlynck — UZ Gent
• Study coordinator: Kessewa Abosi-Appeadu
• Email: kessewa.abosiappeadu@ugent.be
• Phone: +32 9 332 3774

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

• Comparing two procedures for treating stress urinary incontinence during vaginal prolapse repair

  This study is testing whether a new type of surgery or an injection is better for helping women with stress urinary incontinence during vaginal prolapse repair.

  Recruiting University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center · Cleveland, Ohio · NCT06754046

• Treatment of vaginal atrophy using a low-intensity laser

  This study is testing whether a low-intensity laser treatment can improve vaginal health in postmenopausal women who are dealing with vaginal atrophy.

  Recruiting MeLSyTech, Ltd · Nizhny Novgorod · NCT05335317

• Comparing the Manchester procedure versus vaginal hysterectomy for uterine prolapse

  This study tests whether the Manchester procedure or vaginal hysterectomy works better for women with symptomatic uterine prolapse over a two-year follow-up.

  Recruiting at 6 sites Tampere University Hospital · Helsinki and 5 other locations · NCT07566949

• Amniotic membrane grafting added to mesh surgery for pelvic prolapse and incontinence

  This study tests whether adding a human amniotic membrane graft to polypropylene mesh surgeries helps patients with pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence heal better and reduce complications.

  Recruiting Hospital General de Agudos J. M. Penna · Buenos Aires · NCT07414849

• Vaginal versus robotic-assisted abdominal mesh repair for apical prolapse

  This study will test whether vaginal mesh repair works as well and is as safe as robotic-assisted abdominal mesh repair for women with stage II or higher apical pelvic organ prolapse.

  Recruiting University of Sao Paulo General Hospital · São Paulo, São Paulo · NCT07359755

• Wrist activity tracking to guide early recovery after pelvic organ prolapse surgery

  This study will try giving women having pelvic organ prolapse surgery either usual postoperative advice or a guided early-exercise plan while tracking activity with a wrist accelerometer to see which group reaches "mostly recovered" sooner.

  Recruiting at 6 sites NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network · San Diego, California and 6 other locations · NCT07218016

How to take part

1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.