Clinical trial Recruiting at 1 site Observational

No-touch ascending aorta approach during minimally invasive coronary bypass

Official title: Safety and Effectiveness of No-touch Technique for Ascending Aorta in Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting(MICS-CABG)

Run by Peking University Third Hospital · NCT07172620 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This tests whether a 'no-touch' way of handling the ascending aorta during minimally invasive coronary bypass keeps bypass grafts open as well as conventional off-pump bypass for people who need coronary artery bypass surgery.

Quick facts

Study typeObservational
SexAll
Enrollment260 (estimated)
SponsorPeking University Third Hospital
Academic / other
Locations1 site (Beijing, Beijing Municipality)
StatusRecruiting
StartedJune 1, 2025
Main results expectedDecember 31, 2026
Study endsDecember 31, 2030
Registry record updatedSeptember 15, 2025
Trial IDNCT07172620 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Ideal candidates are adults who require multi-vessel coronary artery bypass grafting confirmed by angiography, including some patients with ascending aortic calcification who cannot tolerate sidewall clamping.

Probably not a fit

Patients with extensive prior myocardial damage, very low ejection fraction, severe ventricular enlargement, unstable intraoperative hemodynamics, or those requiring valve or other intracardiac procedures are unlikely to benefit or qualify.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

This single-center prospective cohort compares perioperative safety and longer-term graft patency in patients receiving minimally invasive cardiac surgery coronary artery bypass grafting (MICS-CABG) using a 'no-touch' technique on the ascending aorta versus conventional median sternotomy off-pump CABG (OPCAB). Participants are assigned to an exposure group (MICS-NoTouch with LIMA+SVG via a small left-chest incision and avoidance of proximal ascending aorta anastomosis) or a control group (conventional median sternotomy OPCAB with saphenous vein graft proximal anastomosis to the aorta). Primary analyses test noninferiority of bridge vessel patency rates and compare perioperative safety metrics and survival/MACCE during follow-up. The study enrolls patients indicated for CABG by coronary angiography and may include those with ascending aortic calcification who are unsuitable for sidewall clamping, while excluding patients with very large prior infarcts, severe ventricular dysfunction, or need for concurrent valve surgery.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, the no-touch MICS approach could provide comparable long-term graft patency with less surgical trauma and faster recovery than conventional off-pump CABG.

How similar studies have gone: Other off-pump and 'no-touch' aortic strategies have shown reduced aortic manipulation and lower stroke risk in non-randomized and some randomized work, but robust randomized data specifically on MICS no-touch graft patency remain limited.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

* Patients with angina pectoris who experience functional limitations in daily life and work despite conservative medical treatment and who require coronary artery bypass grafting surgery, as confirmed by coronary angiography, are eligible for enrollment.
* Patients with calcification of the ascending aorta, as confirmed by CT, who are not suitable for sidewall clamping are also eligible for enrollment.

Exclusion Criteria:

* The patient presents with an old, large myocardial infarction with no surviving myocardium, as evidenced by both isotope and echocardiographic imaging. This is a group of patients who are prone to complications, including significant cardiac enlargement, a cardiothoracic ratio greater than 0.75, an ejection fraction (EF) less than 30%, a left ventricular diameter (LVDd) greater than 70mm, the presence of a left ventricular ventricular wall tumor, or severe arrhythmia. Intraoperative hemodynamic instability;
* Valve surgery or other intracardiac surgery at the same time;
* Patients expected to undergo extracorporeal circulation surgery;
* Poor myocardial infarction conditions, extensive lesions, distal or full diffuse stenosis, or lumen diameter less than or severe calcification that cannot be anastomosed.
* Previous open heart surgery.
* Patients with preoperative hemodynamic instability requiring emergency surgery.
* Other conditions include terminal malignant tumors, uncontrollable infections, bleeding, persistent progressive degenerative systemic diseases, severe brain injuries, and multiple organ failure. Additionally, other significant organ function serious impairments, such as severe liver function impairment, severe heart failure, or cardiogenic shock, may also be considered contraindications. Inability to tolerate surgery may also be considered a contraindication.
* The participant declines to take part in this study.

Where it's running

  • Peking University Third Hospital
    Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
    Recruiting

Study contacts

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

  • Multimodal regional nerve blocks to improve recovery after off-pump CABG

    This study tests whether using multiple regional nerve blocks can reduce pain and help patients recover after off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery.

    Recruiting Ain Shams University · Cairo · NCT07794527

  • Red grape juice and metabolism in men with coronary disease

    Researchers will test whether daily red grape juice changes the blood metabolite profile in men with chronic coronary artery disease.

    Recruiting University of Sao Paulo General Hospital · São Paulo, São Paulo · NCT07777341

  • CCTA-Guided CABG vs CAG-Guided CABG

    This study tests whether planning CABG with a non-invasive CCTA scan works as well as planning with the standard invasive CAG approach for people with blocked heart arteries.

    Recruiting Ruijin Hospital · Shanghai · NCT07769008

  • Edoxaban vs. Apixaban in AF with CAD: Net Benefit

    This trial tests whether edoxaban-based therapy provides a similar or better overall benefit than apixaban-based therapy for stroke prevention and major bleeding in adults with atrial fibrillation and coronary artery disease.

    Recruiting Phase 4 Samsung Medical Center · Seoul · NCT07753200

  • Revascularization of Calcified Coronary Arteries

    This study tests whether measuring blood flow and pressure before and after ballooning or stenting of calcified coronary arteries can help predict how well the procedure will work for adults with heart disease.

    Recruiting Aalborg University Hospital · Aalborg · NCT07724184

  • OPN Balloon Use for Recanalization of Calcified Coronary Lesions

    This registry tests how the SIS-OPN balloon is used in real-world patients with calcified coronary disease who have undergone PCI in North America.

    Recruiting Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation · Minneapolis, Minnesota · NCT07646444

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.