Neuromuscular reeducation versus post facilitation stretch for upper crossed posture in IT professionals
Official title: Effects of Neuromuscular Reeducation Versus Post Facilitation Stretch Technique for Upper Cross Syndrome Among IT Professionals
Run by Foundation University Islamabad · NCT07061782 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This will test whether neuromuscular reeducation or post facilitation stretch better reduces neck pain and improves neck movement in IT professionals with upper cross syndrome.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 20 Years to 40 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 44 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Foundation University Islamabad Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Islamabad) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | July 15, 2024 |
| Main results expected | July 15, 2025 |
| Study ends | July 15, 2025 |
| Registry record updated | July 11, 2025 |
| Trial ID | NCT07061782 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
IT professionals aged 20–40 with at least two months of neck pain and a clinical diagnosis of upper cross syndrome who can attend in-person sessions are ideal candidates.
✕Probably not a fit
People with a history of cervical spine fracture, recent neck trauma, or other serious spine pathology may not benefit or may be excluded.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This randomized controlled trial assigns IT professionals with upper cross syndrome to either neuromuscular reeducation (NMR) or post facilitation stretch (PFS), with both groups also receiving strengthening exercises for weak muscles. Baseline measures of cervical range of motion (goniometer), pain (NPRS), and Neck Disability Index will be recorded and repeated after two weeks of treatment. The investigator will compare pre- and post-treatment changes between the two groups to determine which technique produces greater short-term improvement. Treatments are delivered in person at Foundation University College of Physical Therapy in Islamabad.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the preferred technique could provide faster reduction in neck pain and better neck function for affected IT workers.
How similar studies have gone: Previous small physiotherapy studies of motor-control reeducation and manual stretching techniques have shown mixed but sometimes promising short-term improvements, while direct head-to-head comparisons are limited.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Inclusion Criteria: IT profressionals 20 - 40 years Both genders Diagnosed UCS Pain from 2 months Minimum 4 - 6 hours working Exclusion Criteria: * History of cervical spine Fracture Trauma to neck
Where it's running
-
Foundation University College of Physical Therapy
Islamabad, Pakistan Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Hina Ayub, DPT
- Email: hinaayub881@gmail.com
- Phone: +923495830798
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Kendall exercises with and without positional release therapy for upper crossed syndrome
This study tests Kendall exercises with and without positional release therapy to see if they reduce neck and shoulder pain and improve posture in adults with upper crossed syndrome.
-
Breathing and manual therapy to improve function in college students with upper cross syndrome
In college students with upper cross syndrome, adding a specific breathing technique (ujjayi pranayama) to manual therapy is being tested to see if it helps spinal alignment relate to better functional performance.
-
Kendall vs Janda’s Approach with Diaphragmatic Breathing for Upper Crossed Syndrome
This trial tests whether Kendall exercises with diaphragmatic breathing help reduce pain and disability in people with Upper Crossed Syndrome compared with Janda’s approach plus diaphragmatic breathing.
-
Egoscue vs Feldenkrais for Upper Cross Syndrome
This trial compares two exercise approaches, Egoscue and Feldenkrais, to see if one can reduce neck and shoulder pain and improve posture in adults with upper cross syndrome.
-
Maitland mobilization plus Kendall exercises vs Kendall exercises alone for upper cross syndrome
This trial tests whether adding Maitland mobilization to Kendall exercises helps reduce neck/upper back pain and improve posture in adults with Upper Cross Syndrome.
-
Rib mobilization with postural correction exercises for Upper Crossed Syndrome
This will test whether adding rib mobilization to postural correction exercises helps people aged 20–45 with Upper Crossed Syndrome reduce neck pain and improve posture and thoracic mobility.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.