Clinical trial Recruiting at 1 site Observational Ages 11 to 18

Modified versus classic Nuss repair for pectus excavatum in adolescents

Official title: Single-Center Retrospective Comparative Analysis Of Modified Vs. Classical Nuss Technique In The Surgical Correction Of Pectus Excavatum "

Run by University Hospital, Strasbourg, France · NCT07312448 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This research will see if the modified or classic Nuss procedure gives shorter surgery time, less postoperative pain, shorter ICU stays, and better cosmetic results for teens with pectus excavatum.

More Pectus Excavatum trials

Quick facts

Study typeObservational
Ages11 Years to 18 Years
SexAll
Enrollment80 (estimated)
SponsorUniversity Hospital, Strasbourg, France
Academic / other
Locations1 site (Strasbourg)
StatusRecruiting
StartedDecember 2, 2024
Main results expectedFebruary 2026
Study endsFebruary 2026
Registry record updatedDecember 31, 2025
Trial IDNCT07312448 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Ideal candidates are adolescents aged 11–18 with pectus excavatum and a Haller index ≥2.25 who underwent either the classic or modified Nuss procedure between 2010 and 2024.

Probably not a fit

Patients younger than 11 or older than 19, those with a Haller index below 2.25, or those treated with Ravitch or other non-Nuss techniques will not be included and are unlikely to benefit from the study's findings.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

This is a retrospective observational comparison of adolescents (11–18 years) who underwent either the classic or modified Nuss repair at CHU de Strasbourg between 2010 and 2024. Eligible patients have a Haller index of 2.25 or higher and data will be collected from surgical records, pain scores, ICU stay documentation, and follow-up cosmetic assessments. The study will compare operative time, postoperative pain control, length of ICU stay, complications, and cosmetic outcomes between the two technique groups using standard statistical methods. Findings aim to highlight any technique-related differences that could inform surgical practice for pectus excavatum.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If one approach shows clear advantages, patients could receive the technique associated with shorter operations, less pain, and improved cosmetic results.

How similar studies have gone: There are surgical series reporting outcomes for Nuss variations, but direct head-to-head comparative data between classic and modified techniques remain limited.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

* Patients aged 11 to 18 years.
* Patients who underwent surgery between 2010 and 2024 using either the classic or modified Nuss technique. - Patient with a Haller index of 2.25 or higher.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Patients with a Haller score below 2.25.
* Patients who have undergone surgery using alternative techniques such as Ravitch or modified Ravitch.
* Patients under 11 years of age or over 19 years of age.

Where it's running

  • Service de Chirurgie Pédiatrique - Réanimation - CHU de Strasbourg - France
    Strasbourg, France
    Recruiting

Study contacts

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.