Minimally invasive treatment for brain hemorrhage compared to standard care
Official title: Ultra-Early, Minimally inVAsive intraCerebral Haemorrhage evacUATion Versus Standard trEatment (EVACUATE)
Run by University of Melbourne · NCT04434807 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing a new, less invasive treatment for brain bleeding to see if it works better than standard care for patients who arrive at the emergency room with a significant hemorrhage.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 240 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | University of Melbourne Academic / other |
| Drugs / interventions | idarucizumab |
| Locations | 13 sites (Newcastle, New South Wales and 12 other locations) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | November 15, 2020 |
| Main results expected | December 2027 |
| Study ends | December 2028 |
| Registry record updated | October 28, 2025 |
| Trial ID | NCT04434807 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are adults aged 18 and older with a significant intracerebral hemorrhage of at least 20mL and moderate neurological deficits.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with brainstem hemorrhages or those whose hemorrhage is secondary to trauma may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This clinical trial evaluates the effectiveness of ultra-early, minimally invasive hematoma evacuation compared to standard medical treatment for patients with supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage. Patients presenting to the emergency department with a hemorrhage volume greater than 20mL will be randomly assigned to either the new treatment or standard care within 8 hours of symptom onset. The study employs a randomized, open-label design with a focus on successful hematoma evacuation as an intermediate endpoint. The trial aims to gather data from at least 240 patients to assess the outcomes of the interventions.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this approach could significantly improve recovery outcomes for patients suffering from intracerebral hemorrhage.
How similar studies have gone: Other studies have shown promise with minimally invasive techniques for similar conditions, suggesting potential for success in this approach.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Patients with an acute supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) ≥20mL in volume 2. Age ≥18 years 3. Surgery can commence within 8 hours of symptom onset (the time the patient was last known to be well) or, in patients with wake-up onset, within 8 hours of the time the patient awoke with symptoms. Patients presenting with small ICH (volume \<20mL) with clinical deterioration judged due to ICH hematoma expansion meeting volume criteria may be randomized if surgery can commence within 8 hours of clinical deterioration 4. Moderate neurological deficit (NIHSS≥6) 5. Pre-stroke mRS ≤3 (independent function or requiring only minor domestic assistance and able to manage alone for at least 1 week). 6. CTA or MRA is performed and does not show an underlying vascular lesion Exclusion Criteria: 1. Brainstem ICH 2. ICH secondary to trauma, where brain injury is judged more likely to be due to the broad effects of trauma rather than the focal ICH. 3. Hereditary or acquired hemorrhagic diathesis or coagulation factor deficiency (in liver disease, INR\>1.4). 4. Platelet count \<75,000 5. Unreversible heparinization or anticoagulation. If reversing warfarin, INR should be ≤1.4 before procedure commences. Reversal of heparin by protamine, dabigatran by idarucizumab and rivaroxaban, apixaban and enoxaparin by andexanet (where available) is permitted. Unreversed anticoagulation with a last dose within 48 hours is an exclusion. 6. Recent (\<12 hours) parenteral GPIIb/IIIa antagonist. 7. Recent (\<1 hour) thrombolysis. If the ICH has occurred between 1 and 12 hours following thrombolysis, cryoprecipitate (1U per 10kg) and tranexamic acid must be administered prior to treatment. 8. Participation in any investigational study in the last 30 days 9. Pregnant women (clinically evident) 10. Co-morbidities or advance care directive preventing general anaesthesia for the procedure. 11. Known terminal illness such that the patients would not be expected to survive a year. 12. Planned withdrawal of care or comfort care measures. 13. Any condition that, in the judgment of the investigator could impose hazards to the patient if study therapy is initiated or affect the participation of the patient in the study.
Where it's running
-
John Hunter Hospital
Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia Recruiting -
Liverpool Hospital
Sydney, New South Wales, Australia Recruiting -
The Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital
Brisbane, Queensland, Australia Recruiting -
Gold Coast University Hospital
Southport, Queensland, Australia Recruiting -
The Royal Adelaide Hospital
Adelaide, South Australia, Australia Recruiting -
The Alfred Hospital
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Recruiting
Show 7 more locations
-
The Royal Melbourne Hospital
Parkville, Victoria, Australia Recruiting -
Prince of Wales Hospital
Sydney, New South Wales, Australia Not yet recruiting -
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
Sydney, New South Wales, Australia Not yet recruiting -
Westmead Hospital
Sydney, New South Wales, Australia Not yet recruiting -
Princess Alexandra Hospital
Brisbane, Queensland, Australia Not yet recruiting -
The Austin Hospital
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Not yet recruiting -
Monash Medical Centre
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Not yet recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Timothy Kleinig — Royal Adelaide Hospital/University of Adelaide
- Study coordinator: Melbourne Brain Centre at the Royal Melbourne Hospital
- Email: info@thembc.org.au
- Phone: +61 3 9342 4424
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Deep phenotyping to explore recovery in young adults after stroke
This project will test whether a detailed health and sample-collection approach (deep phenotyping) is practical and acceptable for people aged 18–55 who have had a stroke.
-
Stem cell therapy for chronic stroke recovery
This study is testing whether using a patient's own stem cells can help people with long-term stroke recovery feel better and improve their daily functioning.
-
Understanding the impact of brain swelling in stroke patients
This study is trying to understand how brain swelling affects people who have had a severe type of stroke to see if it can help improve their treatment.
-
AI-based tools to help diagnose, treat and predict stroke outcomes across multiple hospitals
This study tests AI-powered tools on real-world stroke patients to see if they can improve pre-hospital triage, diagnosis, and outcome prediction while data stay securely within each hospital.
-
Web-based therapy using action observation and mirror therapy for arm weakness after stroke
This trial tests whether a mobile telerehabilitation app delivering action observation therapy (AOT) alone or combined AOT with mirror therapy (AOT-MT) can improve upper limb function in people with subacute stroke.
-
Remote Ischaemic Conditioning for Fatigue After Stroke 2
Aat least 12 weeks after stroke, adults with post-stroke fatigue will try a simple hand-arm cuff treatment at home to see if it helps reduce fatigue.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.