Mechanical versus electrocautery dilator for EUS-guided biliary drainage
Official title: Safety and Efficacy of Mechanical Versus Electrocautery Dilator for EUS-guided Biliary Drainage: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
Run by National Taiwan University Hospital · NCT06620328 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This trial will test whether using a mechanical dilator instead of an electrocautery dilator reduces bleeding during EUS-guided biliary drainage for patients with biliary obstruction after failed ERCP.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 64 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | National Taiwan University Hospital Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Taipei) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | July 3, 2025 |
| Main results expected | December 31, 2026 |
| Study ends | December 31, 2026 |
| Registry record updated | January 13, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT06620328 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are adults with biliary obstruction who have failed ERCP or have an inaccessible papilla due to altered anatomy or gastric outlet obstruction and who are eligible for EUS-guided biliary drainage without uncorrectable coagulopathy or unmanageable ascites.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with uncorrectable coagulopathy, unmanageable ascites, cancer infiltrating the planned puncture route, serious comorbidities prohibiting endoscopic management, pregnancy, minors, or those who refuse consent are unlikely to benefit from participation.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
Patients who require endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage after failed ERCP will undergo tract dilation with either a mechanical dilator or an electrocautery dilator and be followed for bleeding and other complications. The procedure uses EUS to puncture the dilated bile duct, place a guidewire, dilate the tract, and insert a stent for drainage. The primary focus is comparing post-dilation bleeding rates between the two dilation methods, along with procedural success and other adverse events. Data so far are mostly retrospective, so prospective comparison in this population aims to clarify relative safety.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the mechanical dilator approach could lower the risk of post-dilation bleeding and make EUS-guided biliary drainage safer for patients.
How similar studies have gone: Only retrospective studies have directly compared mechanical and electrocautery dilation, so prospective evidence remains limited though retrospective data suggest differences in complication profiles.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Failed ERCP * The papilla is inaccessible owing to a surgically altered anatomy or gastric outlet obstruction * Contraindications for PTCD such as ascites and possibility of self-tube removal Exclusion Criteria: * Patients younger than 18 years old * Cancer infiltration of the gastric/duodenal wall within the planned puncture route * Patients with uncorrectable coagulopathy * Patients with unmanageable ascites * Patients with serious comorbidities that prohibited endoscopic management * Patients with pregnancy * Patients who cannot or refuse to provide informed consent
Where it's running
-
National Taiwan University Hospital
Taipei, Taiwan Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Yu-Ting Kuo
- Email: sfstruck@gmail.com
- Phone: +886972652398
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
EUS-guided pancreaticobiliary procedures with the RIVOS access device
This study tests how the RIVOS EUS access device performs during interventional procedures for pancreatic and bile duct problems in adults.
-
Sedation Methods in PTBD: How Two Regimens Compare for Quality and Recovery
This study tests two sedation plans (propofol with remifentanil vs propofol with ketamine) to see which helps patients recover faster after PTBD while staying comfortable and safe.
-
12-mm Partially Covered vs Bare Self-Expandable Stents for Malignant Distal Biliary Obstruction
This study tests whether a 12-mm partially covered self-expandable stent works better than a 12-mm bare self-expandable stent for patients with unresectable malignant distal biliary obstruction who have already had PTBD.
-
Intraductal antibiotic given during ERCP for acute cholangitis
This trial tests whether putting an antibiotic directly into the bile ducts during ERCP, together with standard IV antibiotics, helps adults with mild-to-moderate acute cholangitis recover faster and avoid worsening infection compared with IV antibiotics alone.
-
Preventing acute cholecystitis using endoscopic techniques
This study is testing if a new endoscopic technique can help prevent acute cholecystitis in patients with certain conditions better than standard care.
-
Biodegradable balloon-expandable biliary stent for benign and malignant bile duct strictures
A one-arm study tests a biodegradable, balloon-expandable stent to open narrowed bile ducts and see if it’s safe and works for people with biliary obstructions.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.