Clinical trial Recruiting at 1 site Interventional Ages 18 and up

Mechanical versus electrocautery dilator for EUS-guided biliary drainage

Official title: Safety and Efficacy of Mechanical Versus Electrocautery Dilator for EUS-guided Biliary Drainage: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

Run by National Taiwan University Hospital · NCT06620328 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This trial will test whether using a mechanical dilator instead of an electrocautery dilator reduces bleeding during EUS-guided biliary drainage for patients with biliary obstruction after failed ERCP.

Quick facts

Study typeInterventional
Ages18 Years and up
SexAll
Enrollment64 (estimated)
SponsorNational Taiwan University Hospital
Academic / other
Locations1 site (Taipei)
StatusRecruiting
StartedJuly 3, 2025
Main results expectedDecember 31, 2026
Study endsDecember 31, 2026
Registry record updatedJanuary 13, 2026
Trial IDNCT06620328 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Ideal candidates are adults with biliary obstruction who have failed ERCP or have an inaccessible papilla due to altered anatomy or gastric outlet obstruction and who are eligible for EUS-guided biliary drainage without uncorrectable coagulopathy or unmanageable ascites.

Probably not a fit

Patients with uncorrectable coagulopathy, unmanageable ascites, cancer infiltrating the planned puncture route, serious comorbidities prohibiting endoscopic management, pregnancy, minors, or those who refuse consent are unlikely to benefit from participation.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

Patients who require endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage after failed ERCP will undergo tract dilation with either a mechanical dilator or an electrocautery dilator and be followed for bleeding and other complications. The procedure uses EUS to puncture the dilated bile duct, place a guidewire, dilate the tract, and insert a stent for drainage. The primary focus is comparing post-dilation bleeding rates between the two dilation methods, along with procedural success and other adverse events. Data so far are mostly retrospective, so prospective comparison in this population aims to clarify relative safety.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, the mechanical dilator approach could lower the risk of post-dilation bleeding and make EUS-guided biliary drainage safer for patients.

How similar studies have gone: Only retrospective studies have directly compared mechanical and electrocautery dilation, so prospective evidence remains limited though retrospective data suggest differences in complication profiles.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

* Failed ERCP
* The papilla is inaccessible owing to a surgically altered anatomy or gastric outlet obstruction
* Contraindications for PTCD such as ascites and possibility of self-tube removal

Exclusion Criteria:

* Patients younger than 18 years old
* Cancer infiltration of the gastric/duodenal wall within the planned puncture route
* Patients with uncorrectable coagulopathy
* Patients with unmanageable ascites
* Patients with serious comorbidities that prohibited endoscopic management
* Patients with pregnancy
* Patients who cannot or refuse to provide informed consent

Where it's running

  • National Taiwan University Hospital
    Taipei, Taiwan
    Recruiting

Study contacts

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.