Managing new left bundle branch block after transcatheter aortic valve implantation
Official title: Comparison of Early Ambulatory Monitoring Strategy Versus Electrophysiological Study Approach in the Management of Patients With New Left Bundle Branch Block After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
Run by Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille · NCT06148883 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This compares using a one-month ambulatory ECG after TAVR with doing an immediate electrophysiology study to decide if patients who develop a new, persistent left bundle branch block need a pacemaker.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 360 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Marseille) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | November 12, 2024 |
| Main results expected | May 2027 |
| Study ends | May 2027 |
| Registry record updated | July 1, 2025 |
| Trial ID | NCT06148883 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults (≥18) who undergo TAVR and develop a new, persistent LBBB (>150 ms) that is stable for at least 48 hours, have anticipated life expectancy >1 year, and have no immediate indications for a pacemaker or prior pacemaker/ICD are ideal candidates.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with documented high-grade AV block, persistent PR interval >240 ms, syncope, clear indications for immediate pacemaker implantation, prior pacemaker/ICD, or an indication for cardiac resynchronization are unlikely to benefit from the randomized comparison.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This is a prospective, randomized, open-label multicenter trial that enrolls patients who develop a new, persistent left bundle branch block (LBBB >150 ms) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVR). Eligible patients with stable LBBB persisting at least 48 hours and without high-grade AV block or a prolonged PR interval are randomized 1:1 to either one month of ambulatory ECG monitoring with post-discharge pacemaker decisions or an in-hospital electrophysiology study with pacemaker implantation if the His–ventricular interval is ≥70 ms. Patients are followed for 12 months with in-person visits at 1 and 12 months and telemedicine visits at 3 and 6 months. The primary outcome compares the proportion of patients alive with an appropriate pacemaker implantation or appropriate non-implantation at 12 months.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this approach could safely reduce unnecessary early pacemaker implants and shorten hospital stays by using outpatient ECG monitoring to guide decisions.
How similar studies have gone: Observational studies and guideline discussions have examined different management strategies for new LBBB after TAVR, but randomized comparisons of ambulatory monitoring versus electrophysiology-guided decisions are limited.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients who are 18 years or older and undergo Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation : 1. Presenting with New Onset Persistent Left Bundle Branch Block, defined as a new Left Bundle Branch Block \>150 ms that persists at least two days after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation and is stable 2. With an anticipated life expectancy \>1 year 3. Who consent to participate to the study Exclusion Criteria: 1. During in-hospital Electrocardiogram monitoring period, immediately after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation and before inclusion: * Documented high grade Atrio Ventricular block (Atrio Ventricular block of a degree higher than Mobitz I) * Persistent PR interval prolongation \> 240 ms * Occurrence of syncope or sudden cardiac death, * Identification of any indisputable criteria for Pacemaker implantation * Definitive Pacemaker implantation 2. Prior Pacemaker or Implantable Cardiac defibrillator 3. Indication for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy or Implantable cardiac defibrillator 4. Pre-existing Left Bundle Branch Block or Right Bundle Branch Block 5. Pre-existing PR interval prolongation \> 240 ms 6. Severe or moderate dementia, evaluated before Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation, defined as a Mini Mental State Examination \< 15 7. Pregnancy or breastfeeding patient 8. No affiliation to a social security scheme 9. Adult under legal protection (trusteeship, guardianship).
Where it's running
-
Hôpital de la Timone - APHM
Marseille, France Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Baptiste MAILLE, MD
- Email: baptiste.maille@ap-hm.fr
- Phone: 491386576
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Left bundle branch area pacing with multimodal guidance vs. conventional pacing for heart failure with complete left bundle branch block
A multicenter trial tests whether using multimodal data to guide left bundle branch area pacing helps people with heart failure and complete left bundle branch block, compared with traditional biventricular pacing.
-
ML-based diagnosis of blocked arteries in patients with a left bundle branch block
Doctors are testing a machine learning tool that uses digital ECGs to see if a blocked coronary artery is present in patients with a left bundle branch block.
-
Using ultra‑high‑frequency ECG to distinguish true LBBB and guide whether left bundle branch or biventricular pacing is best
We will test whether ultra‑high‑frequency ECG can tell 'true' left bundle branch block from other intraventricular conduction delays and see if people with heart failure and a wide non‑RBBB QRS do better with left bundle branch pacing than with biventricular pacing.
-
Evaluating different approaches to cardiac pacing in patients
This study is testing different ways to place pacemakers in adults to see which methods work best and are safest for patients needing heart support.
-
Mapping the Left Bundle Branch Area for Pacemaker Placement
This study is testing how using 3D mapping technology during pacemaker placement can help doctors understand the heart's Left Bundle Branch Area better and improve the success of the procedure for patients.
-
Comparing Biventricular Pacing and Left Bundle Branch Pacing for Heart Failure
This study is testing whether a new way of pacing the heart can help people with heart failure feel better and improve their heart function compared to the standard method.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.