Kendall vs McKenzie Exercises for Upper Crossed Syndrome
Official title: Effects of Kendall Versus McKenzie Exercises on Pain, Functional Disability, and Craniovertebral Angle in Patients With Upper Crossed Syndrome
Run by Riphah International University · NCT07921030 · Data updated 2026-11-12
A 6-week test compares Kendall and McKenzie exercise programs to see which better reduces pain and improves function for people with Upper Crossed Syndrome.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 20 Years to 60 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 58 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Riphah International University Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Gujranwala, Punjab Province) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | January 1, 2026 |
| Main results expected | October 27, 2026 |
| Study ends | January 15, 2027 |
| Registry record updated | November 6, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07921030 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults aged 20–60 with chronic neck pain (≥3 months) and specific posture criteria who meet inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with certain neck, spine, or systemic conditions or with contraindications to exercise may not benefit and could be excluded.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This randomized comparison evaluates two exercise approaches—Kendall and McKenzie—for adults with Upper Crossed Syndrome. Both groups receive standard physical therapy, while one performs Kendall exercises and the other McKenzie exercises, over six weeks. Outcomes include pain, functional disability, craniovertebral angle, and neck endurance, measured at baseline and after treatment. Participants are recruited from Asharab Health Clinic in Gujranwala using a convenience sample and will be randomly assigned to either intervention. Data analysis will use SPSS version 25 to compare changes between groups.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, one approach may offer greater pain relief and functional improvement for people with Upper Crossed Syndrome.
How similar studies have gone: Prior research has explored posture-specific exercises, with mixed results; this study adds a direct Kendall versus McKenzie comparison in this population.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Male and female Age between 20 -60 years Neck pain duration ≥ 3 months NDI score \>20 Forward head posture ≥ 45° Round shoulders ≥ 52 ° Round back \> 40° Pain intensity ≥ 3 Exclusion Criteria: History of any trauma, surgery, or disease of shoulder,spine,pelvis Specific neck pathologies (cervical disc herniation,cervical radiculopathy,inflammatory condition like rheumatoid arthritis or gout, spinal infection and tumor,myelopathy,upper cervical instability,dizziness,vertebral artery insufficiency) Presence of neurological deficit, Diagnosed psychiatric disorder Current participant in other neck/shoulder rehab Having any visible malalignment in the pelvis or lower extremities. Skin allergies and lesions. Pregnancy Uncontrolled cardiovascular or respiratory conditions
Where it's running
-
Ms Ompt
Gujranwala, Punjab Province, Pakistan Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Ali Raza — Ripah International University
- Study coordinator: Imran Amjad, Phd
- Email: imran.amjad@riphah.edu.pk
- Phone: 03324390125
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Kendall versus Feldenkrais exercises for upper crossed posture
This project will test whether Kendall or Feldenkrais exercise programs better reduce neck pain and improve posture and neck function in adults with upper crossed syndrome.
-
Cervical position sense, core stability, and balance in university students with upper crossed syndrome
This project will test if students aged 18–30 with upper crossed syndrome have poorer neck position sense, weaker core stability, and worse postural balance than students without the condition.
-
Mat Pilates to reduce pain and improve posture in schoolchildren with upper crossed syndrome
This trial will test whether adding mat Pilates to routine physical therapy helps schoolchildren aged 8–16 with upper crossed syndrome reduce pain and improve head, neck, and shoulder alignment.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.