Ischemia-guided versus plaque burden and vulnerability-guided revascularization for high-risk coronary artery disease
Official title: Strategic Comparison Of Ischemia-based Versus Plaque Burden and vulnErability-based Revascularization in High-Risk Coronary Artery Disease Patients
Run by Seoul National University Hospital · NCT07324720 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This trial tests whether using intravascular plaque imaging to pick which blockages to open works better than using blood-flow (physiology) tests for people with high-risk coronary artery disease and 50–90% artery narrowings.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 19 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 1944 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Seoul National University Hospital Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Seoul, Main Building) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | April 27, 2026 |
| Main results expected | September 24, 2033 |
| Study ends | September 24, 2033 |
| Registry record updated | August 27, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07324720 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults aged 19 or older with 50–90% de novo coronary stenosis in vessels ≥2.5 mm who have clinical high‑risk features (for example diabetes, CKD stage ≥3B, ACS, prior MI) or complex high‑risk lesions are ideal candidates.
✕Probably not a fit
People with mild (<50%) or very severe (>90%) stenoses, very small vessels, lesions not suitable for PCI, or who cannot undergo intravascular imaging or physiologic testing are unlikely to benefit from this protocol.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
Adults with high-risk coronary artery disease and angiographic stenoses of 50–90% who meet detailed clinical and lesion criteria will undergo one of two PCI guidance strategies. One arm uses intravascular imaging to target lesions based on plaque burden and vulnerability, while the other arm uses physiologic indices such as FFR/iFR to guide revascularization decisions. Procedures, adjunctive imaging or physiologic measurements, and guideline-directed medical therapy will be used per protocol, with clinical follow-up to capture outcomes. The trial compares clinical event rates and procedural metrics between the two guidance strategies to determine which approach leads to better patient outcomes.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this approach could help doctors choose which lesions to treat more accurately and reduce heart attacks, repeat procedures, or other cardiac events.
How similar studies have gone: Physiology-guided PCI (FFR/iFR) has established outcome benefits and intravascular imaging has improved procedural results in other studies, but directly comparing plaque vulnerability-guided revascularization with ischemia-guided strategies is relatively novel.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
① Patients aged 19 years or older
② Patients with moderate to severe coronary artery stenosis identified on coronary angiography:
A. Diameter stenosis of 50%-90% by visual estimation B. De novo lesions (newly developed lesions) C. Reference vessel diameter ≥ 2.5 mm by visual estimation
③ Patients with either clinically high-risk features for recurrent ischemic events or complex high-risk lesions identified on angiography:
A. Clinically high-risk features i. Medically treated diabetes mellitus ii. Chronic kidney disease (≥ Stage 3B, eGFR \< 45 mL/min/1.73 m²) iii. Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) iv. Previous myocardial infarction (MI)
B. Complex high-risk lesions i. True bifurcation lesions ii. Calcified lesions (moderate to severe calcification on angiography) iii. Diffuse long lesions (≥ 30 mm in length) iv. Multivessel disease v. Multiple lesions (≥ 3 lesions)
④ Patients who can verbally demonstrate an understanding of the risks, benefits, and alternative treatments of invasive physiologic or imaging assessment and PCI
⑤ Patients who agree to the study protocol and clinical follow-up plan, voluntarily decide to participate, and provide written informed consent to participate in this clinical trial
Exclusion Criteria:
* Hypersensitivity or contraindication to any of the following medications: heparin, aspirin, clopidogrel, prasugrel, ticagrelor, adenosine, or nicorandil
* Hemodynamic instability requiring mechanical circulatory support (ECMO or IABP)
* Moderate or severe stenosis of the left main coronary artery (diameter stenosis \> 50%)
* History of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)
* Severe asthma or severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) ⑥ Active bleeding
⑦ Major gastrointestinal or genitourinary bleeding within the previous 3 months
⑧ Bleeding diathesis or known coagulopathy, including a history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT)
⑨ Life expectancy \< 2 years due to non-cardiovascular comorbidities
⑩ Inability to provide signed informed consent
⑪ Any condition deemed by the investigator to make the patient unsuitable for this clinical trial or likely to increase study-related risks
Where it's running
-
Seoul National University Hospital
Seoul, Main Building, South Korea Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Bon-Kwon Koo, MD., PhD.
- Email: bkkoo@snu.ac.kr
- Phone: 82-2-2072-7433
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
μFR-guided Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty vs Angiography-guided Angioplasty in Coronary Artery Disease
This trial tests whether using computational μFR guidance during drug-coated balloon angioplasty is better than standard angiography guidance for people with de novo coronary artery lesions.
-
Gastric Ultrasound Before CABG to See if Heart Function Changes Stomach Contents
This study checks whether people with weaker heart function before elective CABG have different stomach contents seen on ultrasound.
-
Can preoperative photon-counting CT help predict heart recovery after bypass surgery?
This observational study tests whether a preoperative photon-counting CT can help predict heart function 3 months after coronary bypass surgery in adults with coronary artery disease.
-
Real-World Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty in Coronary Artery Disease
This registry tests how drug-coated balloons perform in everyday clinical practice for adults with coronary artery disease undergoing PCI.
-
Predicting vasopressor needs after anesthesia in elective on-pump CABG using dynamic arterial elastance
This study tests whether EaDyn measured after induction can help predict which patients will need vasopressors during elective on-pump CABG.
-
Intraoperative Pulse Pressure Variation and Postoperative Lactate Clearance in CABG Patients
This study tests whether the amount a patient’s pulse pressure varies during surgery relates to how quickly lactate levels drop after CABG.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.