Investigating how processed foods affect brain reward systems and learning about food cues
Official title: Effects of Processed Foods on Brain Reward Circuitry and Food Cue Learning
Run by Stanford University · NCT06165952 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing how eating ultra-processed foods affects the brains of teenagers aged 13-15, especially in terms of rewards, attention, and memory, compared to healthier, minimally-processed foods.
Quick facts
| Study type | Observational |
|---|---|
| Ages | 13 Years to 15 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 162 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Stanford University Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Stanford, California) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | October 4, 2024 |
| Main results expected | February 1, 2029 |
| Study ends | February 28, 2029 |
| Registry record updated | April 24, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT06165952 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates for this study are adolescents aged 13-15 with a body mass index within the 25th to 75th percentile.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with current eating disorders, major psychiatric disorders, or serious medical problems will not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This observational study aims to explore the effects of ultra-processed foods on brain regions associated with reward, attention, and memory compared to minimally-processed foods. It will assess how these foods influence neurobehavioral responses and food cue learning in adolescents. The study will involve participants aged 13-15 with specific body mass index criteria and will exclude those with certain psychiatric or medical conditions. The research is motivated by the rising obesity rates linked to the consumption of ultra-processed foods.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could provide insights into how dietary choices impact brain function and eating behaviors, potentially guiding interventions for obesity.
How similar studies have gone: While there have been studies on the effects of ultra-processed foods, this specific investigation into brain activation and food cue learning is novel.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * female and male adolescents 13-15 years of age * age- and sex- adjusted zBMI scores between the 25th and 75th percentile * participant and their guardian must be able to read and speak English to gather valid consent Exclusion Criteria: * current eating disorders or other major psychiatric disorders (e.g., depression, bipolar, schizophrenia, substance use disorder) * fMRI contra-indicators (e.g., metal implants, braces, claustrophobia, pregnancy) * serious medical problems (e.g., Type 2 diabetes, cancer) * history of food allergies or restrictive dietary requirements (e.g., lactose intolerance, vegan) * use of psychoactive drugs more than once weekly * medications that impact appetite or reward functioning (e.g., metformin, anti-psychotic medication, insulin)
Where it's running
-
Stanford University
Stanford, California, United States Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Eric Stice, PhD — Stanford University
- Study coordinator: Eric Stice, PhD
- Email: estice@stanford.edu
- Phone: 541-222-0615
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
A digital tool to help decide about an ICD
We’re testing a patient-friendly online aid to help people with advanced heart failure decide whether an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is right for them.
-
Wise Interventions to Boost Pediatric Weight Control
This study tests whether adding two quick social-psychology activities (growth mindset and self-affirmation) to a family-based weight management program helps 10–15 year-olds with obesity achieve better BMI outcomes over 12 months.
-
Reducing Chronic Pain After Cesarean Delivery
A single-session pain-relief class called Empowered Relief is tested alongside standard postpartum care to see if it helps women who have ongoing pain after cesarean delivery.
-
Human-created animated art vs AI-created art: does it change how you feel right away?
This online trial tests whether watching a human-made animated art film or an AI-made one, or doing nothing, quickly changes mood or sense of connection in U.S. adults.
-
SMILE in one eye vs Ray tracing-guided LASIK in the fellow eye
This study tests two laser vision correction methods—SMILE in one eye and ray-tracing guided LASIK in the other eye—to see which provides better vision and quality of life for adults with myopia and astigmatism.
-
Voices Illuminating Solutions for Outdoor Workers’ Needs and Safety
This trial tests whether adding bilingual Our Voice photovoice participation to standard bilingual occupational health education helps outdoor workers in California better address climate-related health risks.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.