ihtDEStiny® versus Xience™ drug-eluting stents for acute coronary syndrome
Official title: Comparison of a Contemporary Sirolimus-eluting Stent (ihtDEStiny®) With Another Everolimus-eluting Stent (Xience™), Both With Permanent Polymers, in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome and de Novo Coronary Artery Lesions (DestinACSion Study)
Run by Fundación EPIC · NCT07190690 · Data updated 2026-11-12
We will see if the ihtDEStiny® sirolimus-eluting stent works as well as the Xience™ everolimus-eluting stent in adults with acute coronary syndrome who need PCI.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 2100 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Fundación EPIC Academic / other |
| Locations | 20 sites (Alicante and 19 other locations) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | December 19, 2025 |
| Main results expected | October 15, 2029 |
| Study ends | October 15, 2030 |
| Registry record updated | August 10, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07190690 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults (≥18 years) with acute coronary syndrome (STEMI or non‑STEMI) who have de novo coronary lesions with vessel diameter 2.25–4.5 mm and can provide informed consent are eligible.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients in cardiogenic shock, those unable to provide informed consent, or those with lesions outside the specified size range are unlikely to benefit from enrollment.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
Adults with acute coronary syndrome and de novo coronary lesions suitable for drug-eluting stent implantation are enrolled at three Spanish hospitals and receive either the ihtDEStiny® sirolimus-eluting stent or the Xience™ everolimus-eluting stent. The trial compares device-related adverse events and a composite of ischemic and hemorrhagic events (net clinical events) over 12 months after PCI. Clinical and device outcomes are collected during follow-up to compare safety and efficacy between the two permanent-polymer DES. The comparison aims to inform choice of contemporary DES in an ACS population.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the results could identify a safer or more effective stent option for people with ACS undergoing PCI, potentially reducing complications in the first year.
How similar studies have gone: Other randomized trials have shown modern sirolimus- and everolimus-eluting stents to be effective and safe, so this is an incremental head-to-head comparison rather than a wholly novel approach.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients who meet ALL inclusion criteria will be included: * Patients aged ≥18 years, and * Patients diagnosed with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS), either SCASEST (Acute Coronary Syndrome without Persistent ST-Segment Elevation) or IAMCEST (Acute Myocardial Infarction with Persistent ST-Segment Elevation), for which they will undergo PCI, and * Patients with de novo lesions in vessels with a reference diameter of ≥2.25 mm and ≤4.5 mm in whom implantation of one or more DES is clinically indicated, and * Patients who have been informed of the characteristics of the study and have provided written informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: Patients must not meet any of the following exclusion criteria: * Patients in cardiogenic shock according to the severity criteria defined by the Society of Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI): "C" (Classic Shock), "D" (Deteriorating) and "E" (Extremis). * Patients unable to provide informed consent. * Patients with a known hypersensitivity or allergy to aspirin or any P2Y12 receptor inhibitor (clopidogrel, prasugrel, ticagrelor), heparin, contrast agents, or any of the components of DES. * Patients with active bleeding at the time of PCI requiring medical attention. * Patients with planned surgery within the next 3 months. * Patients with any medical condition that limits a life expectancy of less than 12 months. * Patients participating in another clinical trial in which the primary endpoint was not met. * Pregnant or breastfeeding women of childbearing potential with a positive pregnancy test.
Where it's running
-
Hospital Universitario San Juan Alicante
Alicante, Spain Recruiting -
Hospital Universitari Germans Trias I Pujol
Badalona, Spain Recruiting -
Hospital Universitario de Cruces
Barakaldo, Spain Recruiting -
Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron
Barcelona, Spain Recruiting -
Hospital Clínic de Barcelona
Barcelona, Spain Recruiting -
Hospital General Universitario de Castellon
Castelló, Spain Recruiting
Show 14 more locations
-
Hospital Universitario de Donostia
Donostia / San Sebastian, Spain Recruiting -
Hospital Universitario Virgen de La Arrixaca
El Palmar, Spain Recruiting -
Hospital Universitario La Paz
Fuencarral-El Pardo, Spain Recruiting -
Hospital Universitario Juan Ramón Jiménez
Huelva, Spain Recruiting -
Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge
L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain Recruiting -
Hospital Universitario de Leon
León, Spain Recruiting -
Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova
Lleida, Spain Recruiting -
Hospital Universitario Lucus Agustí
Lugo, Spain Recruiting -
Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga
Málaga, Spain Recruiting -
Hospital Universitario de Canarias
San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Spain Recruiting -
Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla
Santander, Spain Recruiting -
Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago
Santiago de Compostela, Spain Recruiting -
Hospital Universitari de Tarragona Joan XXIII
Tarragona, Spain Recruiting -
Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa
Zaragoza, Spain Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Armando Pérez de Prado, MD, PhD
- Email: admin@fundacionepic.org
- Phone: 0034987876135
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
μFR-guided Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty vs Angiography-guided Angioplasty in Coronary Artery Disease
This trial tests whether using computational μFR guidance during drug-coated balloon angioplasty is better than standard angiography guidance for people with de novo coronary artery lesions.
-
Gastric Ultrasound Before CABG to See if Heart Function Changes Stomach Contents
This study checks whether people with weaker heart function before elective CABG have different stomach contents seen on ultrasound.
-
Can preoperative photon-counting CT help predict heart recovery after bypass surgery?
This observational study tests whether a preoperative photon-counting CT can help predict heart function 3 months after coronary bypass surgery in adults with coronary artery disease.
-
Real-World Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty in Coronary Artery Disease
This registry tests how drug-coated balloons perform in everyday clinical practice for adults with coronary artery disease undergoing PCI.
-
Predicting vasopressor needs after anesthesia in elective on-pump CABG using dynamic arterial elastance
This study tests whether EaDyn measured after induction can help predict which patients will need vasopressors during elective on-pump CABG.
-
Intraoperative Pulse Pressure Variation and Postoperative Lactate Clearance in CABG Patients
This study tests whether the amount a patient’s pulse pressure varies during surgery relates to how quickly lactate levels drop after CABG.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.