Hydrogel treatment for painful degenerative discs in the lower back
Official title: HYDRAFIL-D: HYDRogel Augmentation For Intervertebral Lumbar Discs
Run by ReGelTec, Inc. · NCT06011551 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing a new hydrogel treatment for people with chronic low back pain from degenerative discs to see if it helps them feel better compared to sticking with standard care.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 22 Years to 85 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 225 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | ReGelTec, Inc. Industry-sponsored |
| Drugs / interventions | radiation |
| Locations | 16 sites (Birmingham, Alabama and 15 other locations) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | January 13, 2025 |
| Main results expected | December 31, 2027 |
| Study ends | December 31, 2028 |
| Registry record updated | September 18, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT06011551 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are adults aged 22 to 85 with chronic low back pain from degenerative disc disease who have not responded to conservative treatments for at least six months.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with active infections or significant skin conditions at the injection site will not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This study evaluates the safety and effectiveness of the ReGelTec HYDRAFIL™ System in patients suffering from chronic low back pain due to degenerative disc disease. It is a multi-center, prospective, dual arm, randomized, controlled pivotal study involving subjects who have not found relief from conservative care for at least six months. Participants will receive either the HYDRAFIL treatment or continue with conservative management, with outcomes assessed over time to determine the treatment's efficacy.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this treatment could significantly reduce chronic low back pain and improve functionality for patients with degenerative disc disease.
How similar studies have gone: Other studies have shown promise with similar augmentation techniques, suggesting potential for success in this approach.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Male or female subjects aged 22 to 85 years, inclusive * Subjects presenting with LBP greater than leg pain and symptoms of DDD of the lumbar region (L1- S1) of at least six (6) months duration * Presence of one (1) or two (2) symptomatic disc(s) (i.e., only 1-level or 2-levels may be treated during the study) as determined by Discography * Symptomatic disc(s) exhibiting Grade 4 to 8 degeneration on the modified Pfirrmann scale as determined by MRI * Failure to have their symptoms resolve or reduce following at least six (6) months of conservative care (as defined in the body of the protocol) * Psychosocially, mentally and physically able and willing to fully comply with this protocol including adhering to follow-up schedule and requirements and filling out forms * English fluency * Signed informed consent Exclusion Criteria: * Active systemic or local infection * Any skin disease or inadequate tissue coverage at the site of the proposed injection * Annular tear or defect that shows free contrast extravasation into the epidural space during or after Discography * Presence of more than two (2) symptomatic discs presenting with pain confirmed during Discography * Presence of extruded or sequestered disc herniation (i.e., disc extrusions or sequestrations) at the symptomatic level(s) or on adjacent levels * Presence of wide annular fissures confluent with large disc protrusions at the symptomatic level(s) * Epidural steroid injection, intradiscal injection, trigger point injection, facet or medial branch block within 60 days of randomization * Opioid medication usage \>60 MME (morphine milligram equivalent)/day or increase in opioid use within 60 days of randomization * Evidence of Modic type 3 changes at the symptomatic level(s) or on adjacent levels * Subjects presenting with nerve pain following a dermatomal distribution and that correlates with nerve compression on imaging where lower limb pain is greater than back pain or by history within the past six (6) months. Note: somatic referred pain is allowed * Evidence of neurogenic claudication due to spinal stenosis * Subjects having had any prior lumbar spine surgery (instrumented or non-instrumented) except: a. A non-instrumented procedure not at the symptomatic or adjacent levels (i.e., discectomy, laminectomy, MILD procedure) is not exclusionary if the procedure was completed at least one (1) year or greater from randomization with complete resolution of treated symptoms and no recurrence * History of vertebral fractures in the lumbar spine * Evidence of severe compression of cauda equina * Evidence of spinal segmental instability (spondylolysis or spondylolisthesis: Grade \>1), severe spinal canal stenosis, isthmus pathology, or scoliosis \[Cobb angle \>20 at the index level(s)\] * Subjects with arachnoiditis * Subjects who are prisoners or wards of courts * Subjects involved in active litigation including worker's compensation cases * Subjects on chronic anticoagulation due to a bleeding disorder and unable to safely stop anticoagulants, or has taken anticoagulants within three (3) days prior to procedure * Subjects with LBP of non-spinal or unknown etiology * Subjects who have a history (in the last five (5) years) of substance abuse or chemical dependency (pharmaceuticals, illicit drugs, alcohol) or are current abusers (using definition criteria from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-V)) * Subjects who have major psychiatric disorders, such as major depression, bipolar disorder and schizophrenia, as defined by the DSM-V * If female, subjects who are pregnant or are trying to become pregnant during the course of the trial (due to risks of additional radiation exposures) * Failure to understand informed consent or inability or unwillingness to adhere to the study follow-up visit schedule or other protocol requirements * Subjects who have participated in any other clinical study within the last three (3) months that, in the opinion of the investigator, could bias the results of the HYDRAFIL-D study, or subjects that are actively participating in any other clinical study, or have planned participation in any other clinical study during the course of this trial. Note: subjects must agree they will not participate in any other clinical study during the course of this trial * Body Mass Index (BMI) \>40 kg/m2 * Known allergy or hypersensitivity to any of the device materials * Endocrine or metabolic disorder known to affect osteogenesis * Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus * Inability to undergo X-ray, MRI, CT scans or other radiographic assessments, including Discography * Any comorbid medical condition which, in the best judgement of the Investigator, would make the subject unsuitable for inclusion in the study or interferes with the proper assessment of safety or effectiveness (e.g., systemic disease) * Subjects with any active malignancy or who have been previously diagnosed with a malignancy and have evidence of residual disease * Any degenerative or neurological condition that would interfere with evaluation of outcomes or that may generate an unacceptable risk of failure or postoperative complications * Chronic or acute renal and/ or hepatic impairment * Evidence of severe osteoporosis. The SCORE/MORES will be utilized to screen if a DEXA scan is indicated. If SCORE/MORES value ≥ 6; then a DEXA scan is required. Severe osteoporosis is defined as DEXA T-score \< -2.5 (spine or hip) or QCT T-score \< 80mg/cubic cm
Where it's running
-
Alabama Clinical Therapeutics
Birmingham, Alabama, United States Recruiting -
Source Healthcare
Santa Monica, California, United States Recruiting -
Boomerang Healthcare (IPM Medical Group)
Walnut Creek, California, United States Recruiting -
DBPS Research (The Denver Spine & Pain Institute)
Greenwood Village, Colorado, United States Recruiting -
The Orthopaedic Institute
Gainesville, Florida, United States Recruiting -
Southwest Florida Pain Center
Port Charlotte, Florida, United States Recruiting
Show 10 more locations
-
NRSA Group (Florida Spine & Pain Specialists)
Riverview, Florida, United States Recruiting -
Tenet Florida Physician Services II (Cantor Spine Center at The Paley Orthopedic and Spine Institute)
West Palm Beach, Florida, United States Recruiting -
Horizon Clinical Research (Southern Pain and Spine)
Jasper, Georgia, United States Recruiting -
Neuroscience Research Center, LLC
Overland Park, Kansas, United States Recruiting -
Spine Institute of Louisiana (The Spine Network)
Shreveport, Louisiana, United States Recruiting -
Clinical Investigations
Edmond, Oklahoma, United States Recruiting -
Precision Spine Care
Tyler, Texas, United States Recruiting -
Virginia iSpine Physicians
Richmond, Virginia, United States Recruiting -
Beam Research (Beam Radiology)
Calgary, Alberta, Canada Recruiting -
International Spine, Pain & Performance Center and Mountain Spine & Pain
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States Active not recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Douglas Beall, MD — Clinical Investigations LLC
- Study coordinator: Seth Kaufman
- Phone: 443-451-3915
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
PMCF look at METROSAN spinal systems and BONEGRAFT materials in adults after spine surgery
This PMCF study tests the safety and performance of METROSAN Titania spinal systems and Bonegraft materials in adults undergoing spinal fusion or stabilization in routine practice.
-
Comparing mini‑TLIF versus MIDLIF for disc-related low back pain
This trial tests whether mini‑TLIF or MIDLIF gives better pain relief, fewer complications, and lower costs for adults with discogenic lower back pain who haven't improved with non-surgical treatment.
-
Bone marrow concentrate injection added to lumbar microdiscectomy
This trial tests whether adding a bone marrow aspirate concentrate injection during lumbar microdiscectomy helps adults recover better than surgery alone.
-
IDCT (Intradiscal Cell Therapy) for single-level mild-to-moderate lumbar degenerative disc disease
This will test whether injecting IDCT (rebonuputemcel) into one degenerating lower-back disc can reduce chronic low back pain in adults with mild-to-moderate lumbar degenerative disc disease.
-
Novosis Putty used with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disc disease
The trial will test whether using Novosis Putty during transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion helps adults with lumbar degenerative disc disease heal better compared with standard care.
-
Evaluating a new treatment for painful disc degeneration
This study is testing a new non-surgical treatment for people with painful disc degeneration to see if it can help relieve their back pain when other treatments haven't worked.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.