Clinical trial Recruiting at 1 site Interventional Ages 20 and up

Four- versus two-point balloon dacryoplasty for blocked tear ducts

Official title: Comparative Outcomes of Four Versus Two Balloon Inflation Points in Dacryoplasty for Primary Acquired Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction

Run by National Taiwan University Hospital · NCT07225244 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This will see if using four inflation points instead of two during balloon dacryoplasty helps people with primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction get better tear drainage.

More Primary Acquired Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction trials

Quick facts

Study typeInterventional
Ages20 Years and up
SexAll
Enrollment50 (estimated)
SponsorNational Taiwan University Hospital
Academic / other
Locations1 site (Taipei)
StatusRecruiting
StartedNovember 2025
Main results expectedDecember 2027
Study endsJune 2028
Registry record updatedNovember 6, 2025
Trial IDNCT07225244 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Ideal candidates are people diagnosed with primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction who have not had prior lacrimal procedures and do not have the listed exclusion conditions.

Probably not a fit

Patients who are pregnant or who have prior lacrimal surgery, upper lacrimal drainage obstruction, punctal stenosis, active dacryocystitis, dacryolithiasis, traumatic obstruction, or a lacrimal mass are unlikely to be eligible or to receive benefit from this procedure.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

Patients with primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction will undergo balloon dacryoplasty using the LacriCATH® device and will be assigned to either a two-point or four-point inflation protocol. The procedures dilate the nasolacrimal duct at specified inflation points to restore tear drainage. Outcomes such as symptom relief, duct patency, and procedure-related complications will be tracked over follow-up visits. The comparison aims to determine which inflation approach yields better functional outcomes and fewer repeat procedures.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, the preferred inflation approach could improve tear drainage and reduce the need for repeat or more invasive lacrimal surgery.

How similar studies have gone: Balloon dacryoplasty is an established technique for nasolacrimal duct obstruction, but head-to-head comparisons of two- versus four-point inflation are limited.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

* Patients diagnosed with primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (PANDO)

Exclusion Criteria:

* Patients who are pregnant, with previous lacrimal procedure, upper lacrimal drainage obstruction, punctal stenosis, active dacryocystitis, dacryolithiasis, traumatic obstruction or lacrimal mass

Where it's running

  • National Taiwan University Hospital
    Taipei, Taiwan
    Recruiting

Study contacts

  • Principal investigator: Yi-Hsuan Wei, PhD — National Taiwan University Hospital
  • Study coordinator: Yi-Hsuan Wei, PhD
  • Email: wn0069@yahoo.com.tw
  • Phone: +886-972653324

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.